Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 May 2013, 19:31
Customize  |  Hide

The Japanese economic model created strong domestic

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 37
Location: Singapore
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

The Japanese economic model created strong domestic [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2004, 20:36
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
For this question, it is of medium difficulty. What I would like to know, is the reasoning between your decision. So, in addition to providing your answer, please provide the reasoning too. Thanks in advance.

===============================================

The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through subsidies from its Ministry of Trade and by closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market. This strategy promised to help economic growth by incubating domestic industries. New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers. The program could reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade.

Which of the following, based on the passage above, is a weakness in this economic strategy?

A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.

B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.

C) Subsidies and import constraints keep domestic prices high and impose a burden on consumers.

D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.

E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4441
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2004, 22:31
I was hesitating b/w A and E but A seems best
A) If there is animosity with other nations, how can we say that balance of trade will be positive? What if there is nowhere else to export because other countries will impose the same tariffs?
B) as blunt as it could sound, we are solely interested in a positive balance of trade, not in the distribution of wealth
C) again, what consumers pay for the product is not of concern as long as the products sell and the aggregate economy is improved
D) we are not interested in the difference b/w the two
E) yes, we know the demand since the products are protected against foreign competition. As the excerpt says, there is a known local demand because there is little foreign competition.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 1031
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 03 Sep 2004, 23:03
C for me... will explain a bit later; gotta rush.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 145
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Sep 2004, 01:06
The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through subsidies from its Ministry of Trade and by closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market. This strategy promised to help economic growth by incubating domestic industries. New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers. The program could reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade.

Which of the following, based on the passage above, is a weakness in this economic strategy?

A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.

B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.

C) Subsidies and import constraints keep domestic prices high and impose a burden on consumers.

D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.

E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be kn

The policy described above would not work if other nations impose a similar ban on Japanese good and thus their exports. this will not help to a balance of trade as suggested. secondly anything that will affect local demand will definately expose the flaw in this augument.

A is wrong because animosity does not mean countries will impose similar sanction on Japan
B is out of the discussion
C affects demands and therefore could be the answer
D is out of the discussion too
E is not right either
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 323
Location: Hanoi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 04 Sep 2004, 08:52
Actually A, C and E are all economic right. However, according to what said in the statement, E seems to be the best ans.
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

  [#permalink] 04 Sep 2004, 08:52
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts domesticated camel cool_jonny009 6 18 Nov 2005, 15:20
Popular new posts The Japanese economic model created strong domestic u2lover 15 11 Jul 2006, 18:14
New posts The relevance of formal economic models to real-world policy vksunder 3 17 Jul 2008, 13:59
Popular new posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC The Japanese economic model created strong domestic gmattokyo 27 03 Nov 2009, 20:20
Popular new posts The coming economic recovery will surely be strong. Most of neashwar 24 10 Nov 2011, 03:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Japanese economic model created strong domestic

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.