Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 25 Jul 2016, 11:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR- MASS TRANSIT

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 355
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

CR- MASS TRANSIT [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2004, 07:37
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Please explain
Attachments

crimg.jpg [ 97.25 KiB | Viewed 877 times ]

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 364 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2004, 08:23
It's b/w A and C but I'll go with C
B directly contradicts the statement
D and E just cannot be inferred
C is most conservative answer. Stem says "because the price of gasoline is still not prohibitive, the number of passengers using PT has fallen". This means that at a certain treshold, when gasoline prices are prohibitive, PT passengers will automatically rise. A assumes a directly proportional increase in PT passengers while the function might be one that starts increasing after a certain treshold as said by the stem.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Nov 2003
Posts: 355
Location: Illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2004, 09:32
Paul wrote:
It's b/w A and C but I'll go with C
B directly contradicts the statement
D and E just cannot be inferred
C is most conservative answer. Stem says "because the price of gasoline is still not prohibitive, the number of passengers using PT has fallen". This means that at a certain treshold, when gasoline prices are prohibitive, PT passengers will automatically rise. A assumes a directly proportional increase in PT passengers while the function might be one that starts increasing after a certain treshold as said by the stem.

But if even if the price of gasoline becomes prohibitive, how can we say for sure that the number of passangers on train will rise? It may be possible that because of the further deterioration in other services on train, the ridership may further decline or it may remain constant. How can we make the price of the gasiline the sole criteria for increase or decrease in the ridership?
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 364 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Aug 2004, 09:58
It is not the sole criterion which will increase ridership. However, it will be one of them. Hence, if it is one of the factors, holding all other factors constant, it then must increase ridership.

The stem says that, compounded to other reasons, since gas prices did not reach that prohibitive level, ridership has fallen. I believe that we can safely say that if gas prices reach that level, people should switch to public transports and increase its ridership.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1810
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2004, 09:13
Yes Got C. I had a bad weekend with lots of CR's getting wrong so I am taking little more time to get back my confidence.
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2004
Posts: 273
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2004, 13:29
since gas prices have not reached prohibitive levels, mass transport decreasing

MTD -> NOT Gas Reached prohibitive levels

Contrapositive is:

Gas Reaches Prohibitive levels -> NOT MTD (C)
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 964
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

[#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Aug 2004, 18:19
the whole paragraph is based on the fact that:
gas price below prohibitive level --> people will switch to their own transport.

C my choice.
[#permalink] 09 Aug 2004, 18:19
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 CR ASSUMPTION SERIES: 3) Groverton Mass Transit Authority 11 17 Feb 2016, 18:37
3 The public is aware of the possibility of biases in the mass 4 11 Sep 2012, 21:37
1 Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will not 21 02 Sep 2009, 14:54
2 Sharks have a higher ratio of cartilage mass to body mass 7 20 Jul 2007, 23:52
Banning cigarette advertisements in the mass media will not 15 09 Oct 2006, 07:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# CR- MASS TRANSIT

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.