CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy?? : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 22:17

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy??

### What do you think is the degree of difficulty of this question?

You may select 1 option
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy?? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 17:54
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Mr. Janeck: I dont believe Stevensen will win the election for governer. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.

Ms. Siuzdak: You're wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state goverment.

Ms. Siuzdak's response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck's remark to imply which of the following?

A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governer.
B) No candidate with out political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one's ability to run a state goverment fairly.
E) Voters generally over estimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.

If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 893
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2004, 19:54
My choice would be A.

B - is out because its a extreme choice - 'No candidate...'
C - Au contraire. She does not think they are analogus. Its Siuzdak who thinks that way.
D - Very generic - not particularly relevant to the stevenson situation here.
E - Voters psyche is out of scope to some extent. Here we are concerned with what Janet implied.
Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2004
Posts: 393
Location: Bangalore, India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy?? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 05:24
I am picking up E because nowhere it is implied that "Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governer". He is just representing views of the voters and E clearly is opposite to that stated by Ms. Siuzdak. Thus, I feel E is the answer.

A is just a contender I believe.

gmataquaguy wrote:
Mr. Janeck: I dont believe Stevensen will win the election for governer. Few voters are willing to elect a businessman with no political experience to such a responsible public office.

Ms. Siuzdak: You're wrong. The experience of running a major corporation is a valuable preparation for the task of running a state goverment.

Ms. Siuzdak's response shows that she has interpreted Mr. Janeck's remark to imply which of the following?

A) Mr. Janeck considers Stevenson unqualified for the office of governer.
B) No candidate with out political experience has ever been elected governor of a state.
D) A career spent in the pursuit of profit can be an impediment to one's ability to run a state goverment fairly.
E) Voters generally over estimate the value of political experience when selecting a candidate.

_________________

Awaiting response,

Thnx & Rgds,
Chandra

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 429 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 08:36
A it is. I'll be with Venksune's explanation.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1810
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 08:51
A clearly. She is giving an explaination to what she understands as "potential disqualification" on grounds of public inexperience.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Posts: 179
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 08:52
A is my choice too. Explanations above seem to quite right.
Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 184
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - Mr.Janeck Vs Ms.Siuzdak.....Hard, Medium, Easy?? [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2004, 08:52
I agree with A. Seems quite logical.
_________________

Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2004, 04:43
The OA is "A". I'm the only person who missed this question.

I posted the OA yesterday but for some reason it didnt show up and therefore i am posting again.
13 Aug 2004, 04:43
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election 5 03 Jun 2010, 10:11
Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election 6 18 Mar 2010, 22:16
13 Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election 24 01 Mar 2010, 11:31
Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election 4 05 Jun 2007, 10:30
Mr. Janeck: I don t believe Stevenson will win the election 2 31 May 2007, 19:44
Display posts from previous: Sort by