Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 07:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Cr - Pre-Columbian artifacts

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

Cr - Pre-Columbian artifacts [#permalink] New post 31 Mar 2006, 19:23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Hi guys,
I saw this one posted recently. However nobody explained the answer to it. Since I got this wrong, I would really like some help on this. Thanks in advance.
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian artifacts is never easy. Carbon-14 dating of these artifacts is often impossible due to contamination by radioactive palladium (which occurs naturally in the soils of Central and South America). However, historians and anthropologists have evolved two reliable criteria, which, utilized in combination, have proven effective for dating these artifacts. First, because authentic pre-Columbian artifacts characteristically occur in a coarse, granular matrix that is shifted by major earthquakes, they often exhibit the unique scratch patterns known as gridding. In addition, true pre-Columbian artifacts show a darkening in surface color that is caused by centuries of exposure to the minute amounts of magnesium in the soil of the Americas.
The criteria above would be LEAST useful in judging the authenticity of which of the following?
(A) An ax head of black obsidian, unearthed from a kitchen midden
(B) A pottery bowl with a red ocher design, found in the ruins of a temple
(C) A set of gold ear weights, ornamented with jasper pendants
(D) A black feather cape from a king’s burial vault
(E) A multicolored woven sash found near the gravesite of a slave
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1351
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Apr 2006, 18:26
go with D.

want to bring it into the discussion.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 146
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 03 Apr 2006, 18:49
Agree with D.

Two criteria can be applied:
1. Unique scratch patterns caused by the shifting of the solid matter/earth that the artifact was found in.
2. Darkened surface color cuased by exposure to the soil (which contains magnesium)

A – “unearthed.â€
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2003
Posts: 1408
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2006, 02:18
I will go with D.

Firstly, its black - so the Mg rule cannot be used to distinguish. Secondly its was in the vault so it would have have been shifted the earthquake!






P.S.: Do not use this to determine the answer, but, its the only organic stuff so shud have decomposed!
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 662
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2006, 02:31
I go with D.
It looks for unique scratch patterns.
It is not possibleto have scratches in feathers. Hence D
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2006, 06:02
Dont you guys think that C is the ONLY one that does not mention soil, earth, etc? Thats the reason I picked C. But remgeo's and sm176811's explanations are pretty convinicing. Especially sm176811's!!! :-D
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 146
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2006, 07:53
kripalkavi wrote:
Dont you guys think that C is the ONLY one that does not mention soil, earth, etc? Thats the reason I picked C. But remgeo's and sm176811's explanations are pretty convinicing. Especially sm176811's!!! :-D


Well, the problem with C is that it doesn't mention WHERE they were found. However, D clearly indicates that it was found in a place and that it was of such a material that neither criteria 1 or 2 can be applied. That was at least my reasoning.

What is the correct answer?? *eager to hear*
  [#permalink] 04 Apr 2006, 07:53
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic Though the artifacts of pre-columbian civilization created a mun23 8 12 Mar 2013, 04:27
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic Though the artifacts of pre-Columbian civization created a Marcab 13 01 Dec 2012, 06:36
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian cybera 3 14 Jul 2005, 14:08
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian MA 6 19 Apr 2005, 21:45
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian Antmavel 5 24 Mar 2005, 18:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Cr - Pre-Columbian artifacts

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.