Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 06:15

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

People who do not understand the laws of probability often

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

People who do not understand the laws of probability often [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2004, 10:55
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:04) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Note: For those who never attempted to support their answer, this is your chance! It's good practice if you do.

People who do not understand the laws of probability often explain random happenings as the work of supernatural forces. Those people would be much less likely to believe in the supernatural if they had knowledge of statistical probability.

The author of the above would agree most with which of the following?
A) supernatural forces must obey the laws of probability
B) there is a scientific explanation for every occurence
C) phenomenology is a valid form of understanding
D) knowledge of the laws of probability reduces the likelihood of a person believing in the supernatural
E) natural causes produce random happenings
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2004, 11:19
A. IMHO Not an answer --> What the hell would make them do that. They won't be supernatural otherwise.

B. IMHO Not an answer --> There may be an explaination for some. Also this is very strong statement.

C. IMHO Not an answer --> Very generic. Experimenting can also be a valid form of understanding

D. IMHO Not an answer --> What if a graduate of premier statistical institute with a degree in advanced stochastic process wants to be Harry Porter?

E. Answer The reasoning behind this can be looked in the argument. This is an assumption. So it's the nature which obeys laws of statistics and every now and then does what ever it has to do which is believed by some as being done by spernatural forces.

If something is rare then it may make some believe that it is due to some supernatural force. But it may happen once in a blue moon. Probability proves that the events were suppose to happen because the numbers said and not because of supernatural forces.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 728
Location: Milwaukee
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Supernatural forces [#permalink] New post 09 Jun 2004, 13:16
Paul wrote:
Note: For those who never attempted to support their answer, this is your chance! It's good practice if you do.

People who do not understand the laws of probability often explain random happenings as the work of supernatural forces. Those people would be much less likely to believe in the supernatural if they had knowledge of statistical probability.

The author of the above would agree most with which of the following?
A) supernatural forces must obey the laws of probability
B) there is a scientific explanation for every occurence
C) phenomenology is a valid form of understanding
D) knowledge of the laws of probability reduces the likelihood of a person believing in the supernatural
E) natural causes produce random happenings




I will second Anand's choice, D it is for me too

A --> passage doesn't state this. Saying this would be like saying, probability is God's boss and orders him what to do

B --> wrong again, passage doesn't state this

C -->wrong

D --) concurs with Authors opinion that, if you understand probability there is less likelyhood that you would interpret happenings as the work of supernatural forces

E --not stated
_________________

Praveen

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Location: Boston
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2004, 00:53
I would go with D,

This is from the argument. It is rephrased.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2004, 04:12
OA is D. Bhai, we are looking for a similar line of reasoning than that of the author, not an assumption.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2004, 07:38
Paul wrote:
OA is D. Bhai, we are looking for a similar line of reasoning than that of the author, not an assumption.


All that crap for nothing. Over analysis always hurts me. I have learned that the first call is usually right for me.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Jun 2004, 07:49
but all that analysis helps you better understand the answer and why your reasoning was wrong (or right). Keep it up!
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 402
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2004, 01:47
Would like to add more to paul's point.

When I joined this group, I was very bad with my verbal skills!
And today, I feel lot more confident and my verbal skills are now much more improved.
Thanks to all the members for such great discussions, believe me these discussions do help you if you read them carefully and try to inculcate these discussions in your daily GMAT practice.

(Just my thought, wanted to share with you people.)
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 11 Jun 2004, 05:30
Thanks folks, I really appreciate your kind words and help.
  [#permalink] 11 Jun 2004, 05:30
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2L at NYU Law who wants to do JD/MBA finny 1 05 Oct 2013, 07:59
2 People often do not make decisions by using the basic GHIBI 3 26 Jan 2008, 08:46
Ok, this is probably really easy, but i do not understand tinman1412 5 25 Apr 2007, 08:18
It is often said that people should be rewarded for doing a mailtheguru 7 12 Aug 2006, 16:29
It is often said that people should be rewarded for doing a WinWinMBA 5 11 May 2005, 15:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

People who do not understand the laws of probability often

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.