Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 08 Feb 2016, 09:21
GMAT Club Tests


GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance


we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

CR The journalistic approach

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 315
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 1

CR The journalistic approach [#permalink] New post 24 Mar 2008, 14:13



Question Stats:

100% (02:19) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
Please don't forget your explanation! Thanks

The journalistic practice of fabricating remarks after an interview and printing them within quotation marks, as if they were the interviewee’s own words, has been decried as a form of unfair misrepresentation. However, people’s actual spoken remarks rarely convey their ideas as clearly as does a distillation of those ideas crafted, after an interview, by a skilled writer. Therefore, since this practice avoids the more serious misrepresentation that would occur if people’s exact words were quoted but their ideas only partially expressed, it is entirely defensible.
Which one of the following is a questionable technique used in the argument?
(A) answering an exaggerated charge by undermining the personal authority of those who made that charge
(B) claiming that the prestige of a profession provides ample grounds for dismissing criticisms of that profession
(C) offering as an adequate defense of a practice an observation that discredits only one of several possible alternatives to that practice
(D) concluding that a practice is right on the grounds that it is necessary
(E) using the opponent’s admission that a practice is sometimes appropriate as conclusive proof that that practice is never inappropriate
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 306
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR The journalistic approach [#permalink] New post 25 Mar 2008, 00:29
This post received
C-is my choice
Practice = crafting others' remarks by journalists
Conclusion= this practice is "entirely defensible".
Evidence= distillation avoids misrepresentation
Author of the argument defends the practice, assuming only above evidence is enough. But maybe this is not enough to defend this practice. What if journalists intentionally represent/quote ideas/remarks that interviewee didn't mean, making Now interviewee responsible for what he didn't say. So defending the practice in light of 1 alternative is flawed.
Re: CR The journalistic approach   [#permalink] 25 Mar 2008, 00:29
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
1 A journalist has stated ArunpriyanJ 0 05 Feb 2016, 22:45
1 Exhaustive details on approaching CR. Although the source is pkmme 3 04 May 2011, 07:27
271 Experts publish their posts in the topic CR Methods - An approach to find the best answers ykaiim 15 23 Apr 2010, 01:31
is there any genral and easy approach for these Qs in CR panacea6565 1 25 Jul 2009, 15:55
Fig's 7 step approach to CR goalsnr 3 27 Jul 2008, 13:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

CR The journalistic approach

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.