|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 909
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
35
[0], given: 33
|
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Video logic
Attachments
untitled.PNG [ 65.57 KiB | Viewed 397 times ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 185
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
I would go with A.
Since if viedeorama rented more than it sold, then the number of rentals would be >4000. Which would almost account for the 10000 decline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 336
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
(E)
(A) may not be right because it can be > 8000 also.
People loan them frequently -- rentals will reduce.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I will go for E. In case of A, if the rentals are more than sales, then the rentals can be 4001 also. Then the decline is still not explained. But, if ppl who bought the vid.s lend them to frnds, then the 4000 vid.s can be viewed by more. However, the second explanation is also not robust enough to support the statement that the sales have gone down by 10K as we do not know the number of frnds they woukld have lent to. But, we can assume without loss of generality that the vid once with the person can be lent to more than 1 frnd!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|
close
