|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 0
|
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Explainations
Attachments
c16.JPG [ 160.43 KiB | Viewed 463 times ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1963
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 0
|
if (A) is right then I will explain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 194
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Also think that it's A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 38
Location: Dallas Texas
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Advertiser's conclusion: buyers of newspaper/magazine save money due to advertising.
I too think its A (consumer does allege that she gets hit by higher cost due to advertising) ... C interested me because of 'implicit contractdition' but I dont know
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 308
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
I guess the answer is A, though C does have its merits. If the consumer does not know the answer to their own question, then they definitely allege. On the other hand it may serve as an opening statement to point out an implicit contradiction in the advertiser's argument...
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 0
|
Nope! it is E. Can someone make me happy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 258
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Yes, I went for E!
Advertising has two effects: positive (lower subscription price for readers) and negative (high costs of goods that are advertised). The advertiser RESTRICTS THE DISCUSSION TO THE POSITIVE EFFECT of advertising and the consumer correctly points it out
I don't think the consumer ALLEGES anything, rather he broadens the subject and considers another aspect of it. So A is good but not accurate enough
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 428
Location: India
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
I went for (D),
OlegC: then by your argument, how will you refute (D). Because if Advertiser holds the opinion of one side of the argument then he is biased isn't it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 258
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Yes, the advertiser is biased but the consumer DOESN'T ATTACK this
D would be true if consumer said "You are the advertiser and you often defend the benefit of your business!". The consumer doesn't do that. Instead he says "but consider this..." thus taking the argument into another area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Vercules, Legendaddy, noboru, Marcab, metallicafan, rajeevrks27, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, souvik101990, doe007, MacFauz, PTK, carcass, kissthegmat, Narenn
|
close
