|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Explainations
Attachments

c17.JPG [ 141.48 KiB | Viewed 383 times ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1963
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 0
|
I think (C) is an inherent assumption
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2004
Posts: 194
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
Tricky, tricky, very tricky, but will go with A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1963
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 0
|
Watch the word can
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 31 Jan 2004
Posts: 38
Location: Dallas Texas
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Tricky it is.
we are looking for the assumption that ties conclusion (C) to evidences(E)
C - Law creates happy families
E1 - Law to provide paid leave and cheap daycare
E2 - parents stressed out with little kids
more E2 (stress) less C ( unhappy families) and we need low E2(stress) more C (happy families)
Ans A - provides that connection
B - links in essence E1 and E2
C - out of scope
D- we dont know yet
E- out of scope
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 May 2004
Posts: 308
Location: Ukraine
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Another vote for A.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1957
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
A it is the OA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|