Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Jul 2014, 01:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 206
Location: Manchester UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2009, 12:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

83% (01:08) correct 17% (01:11) wrong based on 11 sessions
229. Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.
(A) do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find
(B) do not always results from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding
(C) do not always results from malice; nations, such as individuals, can find
(D) aren’t always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find
(E) aren’t resulting always from malice; just like individuals who can find

OA is A please explain....
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 422
Location: Sydney, Australia
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [1] , given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2009, 15:41
1
This post received
KUDOS
a) correct subject verb agreement. Correct use of “like”
b) Incorrect Subject Verb agreement – “results” is wrong. “Just as” can be replaced with “like” so it is unnecessarily wordy.
c) Incorrect Subject Verb agreement – “results” is wrong. “Such as” is incorrect, as it is using individuals to provide an example of a nation, where as the original intention is to draw similarity.
d) Incorrect Subject Verb agreement – “results” is wrong. “In the same way that individuals” can be replaced by “like”.
e) Awkward sentence. The 2nd half of sentence is a fragment.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 119
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 10

Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 01 Nov 2009, 14:15
I'm confused as I don't understand the meaning of this sentence

for nations, like individuals
=> what does it mean ? for nations, as it is for individuals?

the constructions seems awkward
could anyone explain ?

thx
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 64
Schools: Wharton, Kellogg, Duke (Health care management)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 3

Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 09:47
pierrealexandre77 wrote:
I'm confused as I don't understand the meaning of this sentence

for nations, like individuals
=> what does it mean ? for nations, as it is for individuals?

the constructions seems awkward
could anyone explain ?

thx



the second part of the sentence is giving the reason for crises. 'for nations' -> 'because nations'.
All options except A has error(s).
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 119
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 10

Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 09:54
speeddeamon wrote:
the second part of the sentence is giving the reason for crises. 'for nations' -> 'because nations'.
All options except A has error(s).


Sorry again, but what it the subject of the 2nd sentence. Could you please rewrite it another way so that I can understand what I'm currently missing?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 206
Location: Manchester UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 11:28
Even i am still not able to understand what this sentence demands???
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 422
Location: Sydney, Australia
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [1] , given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 17:54
1
This post received
KUDOS
sagarsabnis wrote:
229. Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.


The semi colon separates two individual but related sentences.
The purpose of the second sentence is to add more information to what the first sentence is explaining.

The second sentence basically says "Nations can find themselves lock into difficult positions".
From my understanding this is how I brokedown the second sentence:
"For" - basically means Because. Semicolons are often followed by words such as 'however', 'therefore' and 'for'.
"Nations" - Main subject
"like individuals" - is basically drawing a comparison from one noun to another. It is comparing that Nations are similar to individuals in how they can find themselves lock into difficult positions.
"Locked into difficult positions" - is what the subject is doing so its the verb component.
"unable to back down" - I think this is a modifier for difficult positions but am not completely sure on this one.

Hope this helps
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 119
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 10

Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 02 Nov 2009, 23:58
this helps a little bit thanks,

but for me this "FOR" breaks the stand alone characteristics of the 2nd sentence.


This is a nightmare question... Hope not to find such a question on D-Day :)
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 66
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [1] , given: 3

Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2009, 02:32
1
This post received
KUDOS
Is question correct??

Crises is plural then results should be be correct but in 2nd part of sentence after semicolon(;) "as" is used to compare nations with individuals and IMO "like" will be correct usuage..

so no ans is correct
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
Posts: 422
Location: Sydney, Australia
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2009, 02:52
saorabh wrote:
Is question correct??

Crises is plural then results should be be correct but in 2nd part of sentence after semicolon(;) "as" is used to compare nations with individuals and IMO "like" will be correct usuage..

so no ans is correct


The plural, Crises, would have agreement with result (no 's').
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2009
Posts: 485
Location: Bangalore,India
WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 324

Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2009, 05:40
I could not understand the meaning of the sentence but could eliminate BCD with results/result.
_________________

One Final Try.......

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2009
Posts: 206
Location: Manchester UK
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2009, 13:46
Awesome explanation yangsta8...thanks a lot..
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 186
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 11

GMAT Tests User
Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2010, 13:00
sagarsabnis wrote:
229. Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.
(A) do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find
(B) do not always results from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding
(C) do not always results from malice; nations, such as individuals, can find
(D) aren’t always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find
(E) aren’t resulting always from malice; just like individuals who can find



B-- do not always results is wrong . it should be result
C-- same as B. such as is wrong. it should be like.
D-- wordy and awkward
E-- aren't resulting is wrong. we don't need any continuous tense

A uses do not always result and like
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2010
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2010, 23:14
A - nations compared to individuals - the word "like" used to compare nouns
B - just as - incomplete idiom
C - such as - to be used incase of examples
D - wordy
E - just like individuals...incomplete - individuals not compared to anything

A is right
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2011, 07:14
I think, "C" is the answer.

There are few rules i used to eliminate the answer.
1. Not to use just like, just as so eliminated options B & E
2. There is a rule which says " NEVER use a semi-colon and a coordinating conjunction together "
There are seven coordinating conjunctions: For,And,Nor,But,Or,Yet and So ( FAN BOYS )
Then option A ruled out.
3. Option D doesn't makes sense to me. ( results from Vs results of )
4. Then finally, Option C .
The option sentence make sense in different grammar rules.
i. do not always results from malice; nations, unable to back down.
ii. do not always results from malice; nations, such as individuals, unable to back down [ Note, nations will have citizens, here it means individuals ]
iii. do not always results from malice; nations, such as individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.

like individuals sounds great here in option A but it has ; For. Even if For is not there it doesn't workout.
If For is not there options A looks like this.
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.
This is something like Like Vs Such as
nations, like individuals [ it sounds like nations will not have individuals but it will have similar to individuals ]
nations, such as individuals [ it sounds like nations will have individuals, etc.. i.e such as generally refers to an example]

While trying to narrow down the correct answer, I hope, I am right in my explanation.

I am not sure, how A is correct. Because second sentence itself doesn't stand.
Re-read the sentence with
a. for nations,...unable to back down
b. for nations, like individuals,....... unable to back down
c. for nations, like individuals,can find themselves locked into difficult positions


A correct explanation will be appreciated
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1727
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 63

Kudos [?]: 250 [0], given: 109

GMAT Tests User
Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 07 Mar 2011, 14:33
I think that A cannot be the answer. A noun (nations) after a preposition (for) cannot be the subject in a clause. In this sense, "for nations,...down" is a fragment, and not a clause.

Although it is wordy, I would choose D.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: I know my GPA is brilliant.
Joined: 03 Apr 2011
Posts: 36
WE 1: Big4 Assurance (2 years)
WE 2: Big4 M&A Advisory (2 years)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 7

Re: Crises in international diplomacy [#permalink] New post 22 Aug 2012, 05:33
metallicafan wrote:
I think that A cannot be the answer. A noun (nations) after a preposition (for) cannot be the subject in a clause. In this sense, "for nations,...down" is a fragment, and not a clause.

Although it is wordy, I would choose D.


I totally agree. Starting a sentence with "for" after a semicolon creates a fragment in here.
The sentence should have another part after "unable to back down" to fix the error.

Although option D is wordy, it is gramatically correct. Is there any other thought on this?
Re: Crises in international diplomacy   [#permalink] 22 Aug 2012, 05:33
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from Ashwin_Mohan 3 07 Jul 2008, 17:47
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from mailtheguru 11 28 Jul 2006, 08:24
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from Puilunchristin 4 25 Feb 2006, 12:03
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from nakib77 8 26 Oct 2005, 12:15
Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from MoscowFuturist 12 03 Apr 2005, 05:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.