Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Criticism that the press panders to public sentiment [#permalink]
22 Mar 2007, 08:02
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Criticism that the press panders to public sentiment neglects to consider that the press is a profit-making institution. Like other private enterprises, it has to make money to survive. If press were not profit-making, who would support it? The only alternative is subsidy and, with it, outside control. It is easy to get subsidies for propaganda, but no one will subsidize honest journalism.
It can be properly inferred from the passage that if the press is
(A) not subsidized, it is in no danger of outside control
(B) not subsidized, it will not produce propaganda
(C) not to be subsidized, it cannot be a profit-making institution
(D) to produce honest journalism, it must be profit-making institution
(E) to make a profit, it must produce honest journalism
In CR questions it is very important to read each word throughly and get the essence of the argument. We can rule out 'B' for one more reason since it
mentions that "easy to get subsidy for propaganda" we cannot assume that without the subsidy the propaganda can't be their.