Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 08 Feb 2016, 23:59
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Expert Post
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 490
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Followers: 319

Kudos [?]: 1567 [0], given: 82

GMAT ToolKit User Top 10 in overall
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 28 Mar 2013, 03:31
Expert's post
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (01:41) correct 24% (00:41) wrong based on 251 sessions
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose importance is largely symbolic, more a tool for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

A) for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill
B) for manipulating people's perceptions than for fulfilling
C) to manipulate people's perceptions rather than that it fulfills
D) to manipulate people's perceptions rather than fulfilling
E) to manipulate people's perceptions than for fulfilling
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Press Kudos if you want to say thanks

Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR

Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 77
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 3

Re: Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 28 Mar 2013, 08:08
Vercules wrote:
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose importance is largely symbolic, more a tool for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

A) for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill
B) for manipulating people's perceptions than for fulfilling
C) to manipulate people's perceptions rather than that it fulfills
D) to manipulate people's perceptions rather than fulfilling
E) to manipulate people's perceptions than for fulfilling



for manipulating ... than for fulfilling - adheres to //ism.
Only B fits the bill.

Cheers
SOny
_________________

A bend in the road is not the end of the road unless you fail to take a turn.....

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: need GMAT 700+
Joined: 02 Apr 2013
Posts: 58
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 10-04-2013
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 13

Re: Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 05 Sep 2013, 20:29
Option B.

Only option B is showing correct parallelism.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 6549
Followers: 637

Kudos [?]: 132 [0], given: 0

Top 10 in overall
Re: Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 08 Sep 2014, 18:29
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 702
Location: India
GMAT 1: 590 Q49 V23
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V27
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 46

Top 10 in overall CAT Tests
Re: Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2015, 09:47
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon
whose importance is largely symbolic,
more a tool for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

I agree we can straightly go for Option B simply based on Parallelism.
But since both the actions are intentional, I feel to is comparably better option than for(if available).
manipulating people's perceptions
fulfilling a real military need

I feel it should be something like
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose importance is largely symbolic, more a tool to manipulate people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

Can someone explain?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 160
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.97
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 72

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2015, 11:34
Vercules wrote:
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose importance is largely symbolic, more a tool for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

A) for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill
B) for manipulating people's perceptions than for fulfilling
C) to manipulate people's perceptions rather than that it fulfills
D) to manipulate people's perceptions rather than fulfilling
E) to manipulate people's perceptions than for fulfilling



This is an easy one - However, my question is for the usage of more X rather than Y - is it a correct usage?
_________________

KUDOS!!! :)


Last edited by sa2222 on 11 Dec 2015, 11:38, edited 2 times in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 160
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.97
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 72

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2015, 11:38
Mechmeera wrote:
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon
whose importance is largely symbolic,
more a tool for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

I agree we can straightly go for Option B simply based on Parallelism.
But since both the actions are intentional, I feel to is comparably better option than for(if available).
manipulating people's perceptions
fulfilling a real military need

I feel it should be something like
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose importance is largely symbolic, more a tool to manipulate people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

Can someone explain?


OG explanation states both the usage are correct - for and to, as you mentioned. I dont see a reason why not?
_________________

KUDOS!!! :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2015
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 156

Re: Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2015, 09:51
Mechmeera wrote:
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon
whose importance is largely symbolic,
more a tool for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

I agree we can straightly go for Option B simply based on Parallelism.
But since both the actions are intentional, I feel to is comparably better option than for(if available).
manipulating people's perceptions
fulfilling a real military need

I feel it should be something like
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose importance is largely symbolic, more a tool to manipulate people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

Can someone explain?


Hi Mechmeera,
According to my understanding, l feel if the sentence conveyed the meaning - the missile should have been made with the intention of fulfilling real military need-
then "to" would have made sense
But the sentence above talks about only the role of missile, Hence the role of missile(according to critics) is for manipulating people's perceptions and not for fulfilling real military need .

Hope I was able to help
Regards
Teja
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Sep 2014
Posts: 20
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2015, 19:29
Nevernevergiveup wrote:
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon
whose importance is largely symbolic,
more a tool for manipulating people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

I agree we can straightly go for Option B simply based on Parallelism.
But since both the actions are intentional, I feel to is comparably better option than for(if available).
manipulating people's perceptions
fulfilling a real military need

I feel it should be something like
Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose importance is largely symbolic, more a tool to manipulate people's perceptions than to fulfill a real military need.

Can someone explain?


abstract nouns:
a plan to do..
a strategy to do ..
an idea to do..

Concrete nouns:
a tool that ....
a machine that...
Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3343
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 417

Kudos [?]: 3515 [0], given: 318

Re: Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2015, 23:47
Expert's post
Regarding an alternate choice that has been suggested by a poster using two infinitives in preference to two gerunds, my suggestion would be not to attempt it in an OG question, a practice that is not going to be of any avail. Perhaps choosing the best of the options would be more rewarding since there is no choice as – none of the above – or --state a better choice – in GMAT.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Re: Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose   [#permalink] 15 Dec 2015, 23:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 The new government study, whose summary was made to be avail anceer 2 12 Jul 2014, 04:47
2 The Reader-Response theory of literary criticism contends goodyear2013 2 30 Jan 2014, 02:23
1 A recent New York Times editorial criticized the city s ssandeepan 6 29 Jul 2008, 20:20
The New York literary critic Irving Howe embodied the bhatiagp 6 23 Jul 2008, 23:59
1 A recent New York Times editorial criticized the citys kkarank 13 24 Feb 2007, 09:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Critics contend that the new missile is a weapon whose

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.