Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 03:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Critics who claim that the sale of U.S. military equipment

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Critics who claim that the sale of U.S. military equipment [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2004, 07:29
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Critics who claim that the sale of U.S. military equipment to other countries is destabilizing and leads to war take a narrow view of history. War occurs when one country gains a military advantage over another. By selling arms, the U.S. can ensure that the military balance among countries is maintained and war avoided.

1- The above argument depends on which of the following assumptions?
A) Arms sales by the U.S. do not lead to wars between countries
B) Critics do not understand military history
C) Countries can accurately determine one another's military strength
D) Arms imbalances stimulate conflict between countries
E) Critics misunderstand the principle of military balance between countries

2- Which of the following, if true, most weakens the above argument?
A) Military equipment is usually used to intimidate rather than to actually conduct war
B) A country's military strength depends on military equipment rather than on the expertise of military commanders
C) The sale and delivery of military equipment is usually known only by the two countries involved
D) The military advantages of all countries are well known by the U.S.
E) Military equipment sold by the U.S. to other countries is less sophisticated than the equipment it produces for itself
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 187
Location: illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2004, 08:11
D is already stated in the argument, then how can it be an assumption...
I was debating between A and C...If we negate A, then the argument falls apart...C may also be neccessary, since if we cant analyze the military strenth, then we cannot know if there is an imbalance....But we have to choose one out of these two..will choose C...

I will go for E,,,,in the last one...
The author is trying to imply that (IMO) the US by selling its own equipment is balancing the Military strengths of all other countries with its own...But if US ITSELF has far more superior equipment then it might have an advantage over others.....

Just my 2 cents..may be it is out of scope,.,...
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2004, 10:17
for Q1

Negate C - A country cannot determine other country's military strength
If this is true we cannot say for sure whether there will be war or not because since they cannot accurately determine the strenght they might miscalculate and go to war. In this scenario the balance of arms cannot play any role.

However if D is negated then there is no need to balance power by selling arms ( the whole arguments rests on defining a gal for US selling arms )

I believe D is the best.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 187
Location: illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2004, 10:33
hi anand,

I agree that D may be a good assumption..But what led me to believe me otherwise is this sentence in the argument:

Quote:
War occurs when one country gains a military advantage over another


It already states that when there is an imbvalance the war occurs....May be I am not getting the poijnt..working too hard I guess....
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Apr 2004, 18:11
OA is C and C
For question 1, D cannot be it because as Monarc said, D is merely a stated argument. We do not need to presume it to be an assumption because it already is true. The assumption would be countries could determine one another's strength. Without such capacity, how can we then say that "the U.S. can ensure that the military balance among countries is maintained and war avoided"?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

  [#permalink] 12 Apr 2004, 18:11
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The sales of a product increases as the number of people who have used guerrero25 2 04 Sep 2014, 09:26
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Critics of the research study claimed that monkeys are mohnish104 1 04 Dec 2013, 18:20
Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims GMATT73 14 13 Oct 2005, 23:38
CR - Sales Seminar Critics hkm_gmat 11 06 Oct 2005, 08:45
Brought before a military tribunal for crimes that he claims GMATT73 8 29 Apr 2005, 02:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Critics who claim that the sale of U.S. military equipment

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.