Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Jul 2014, 03:36

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Currently, the city of Grimchester is liable for any injury

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 286
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Currently, the city of Grimchester is liable for any injury [#permalink] New post 21 May 2006, 11:44
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Currently, the city of Grimchester is liable for any injury incurred because of a city sidewalk in need of repair or maintenance. However, Grimchester’s sidewalks are so extensive that it is impossible to hire enough employees to locate and eliminate every potential danger in its sidewalks. Governments should be liable for injuries incurred on public property only if they knew about the danger beforehand and negligently failed to eliminate it.
Which one of the following describes an injury for which the city of Grimchester is now liable, but should not be according to the principle cited above?
(A) A person is injured after tripping on a badly uneven city sidewalk, and the city administration had been repeatedly informed of the need to repair the sidewalk for several years.
(B) A person is injured after tripping over a shopping bag that someone had left lying in the middle of the sidewalk.
(C) A person is injured after stepping in a large hole in a city sidewalk, and the city administration had first learned of the need to repair that sidewalk minutes before.
(D) A person who is heavily intoxicated is injured after falling on a perfectly even city sidewalk with no visible defects.
(E) A person riding a bicycle on a city sidewalk is injured after swerving to avoid a pedestrian who had walked in front of the bicycle without looking.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Posts: 950
Location: France
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 May 2006, 11:58
I'll go with D as it doesn't involve a third party (pedastrian) or thing (shopping bag)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Oct 2005
Posts: 662
Location: London
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 May 2006, 13:31
Go with C.
The sidewalk had a hole. It was the government's fault. But since they knew of it only then, they did not have to compensate the person who fell down.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Posts: 86
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 21 May 2006, 15:28
I also think it is C.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2005
Posts: 1351
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 May 2006, 17:48
remgeo wrote:
Go with C.
The sidewalk had a hole. It was the government's fault. But since they knew of it only then, they did not have to compensate the person who fell down.


goodjob remgeo... C too..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 286
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 May 2006, 18:33
yes it is C

OA C
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1741
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 22 May 2006, 01:15
gmatmba wrote:
I'll go with D as it doesn't involve a third party (pedastrian) or thing (shopping bag)


C for me..... The problem with D is that the street has no defects and according to the princple stated in the first line the city is not liable for that injury.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 May 2006
Posts: 126
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Grimchester city [#permalink] New post 22 May 2006, 08:21
old_dream_1976 wrote:
Currently, the city of Grimchester is liable for any injury incurred because of a city sidewalk in need of repair or maintenance. However, Grimchester’s sidewalks are so extensive that it is impossible to hire enough employees to locate and eliminate every potential danger in its sidewalks. Governments should be liable for injuries incurred on public property only if they knew about the danger beforehand and negligently failed to eliminate it.
Which one of the following describes an injury for which the city of Grimchester is now liable, but should not be according to the principle cited above?
(A) A person is injured after tripping on a badly uneven city sidewalk, and the city administration had been repeatedly informed of the need to repair the sidewalk for several years.
(B) A person is injured after tripping over a shopping bag that someone had left lying in the middle of the sidewalk.
(C) A person is injured after stepping in a large hole in a city sidewalk, and the city administration had first learned of the need to repair that sidewalk minutes before.
(D) A person who is heavily intoxicated is injured after falling on a perfectly even city sidewalk with no visible defects.
(E) A person riding a bicycle on a city sidewalk is injured after swerving to avoid a pedestrian who had walked in front of the bicycle without looking.


"C"
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 5
Location: Encinitas, CA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 May 2006, 14:51
The passage sets up a rule for city liability:
"the city of Grimchester is liable for any injury incurred because of a city sidewalk in need of repair or maintenance."

Does the answer show a sidewalk in need of repair or maintenance as cause of problem?

(A) - yes, sidewalk in need of repair
(B) - no, shopping bag not sidewalk
(C) - yes, hole in sidewalk
(D) - no, sidewalk with no defects
(E) - no, pedestrian not sidewalk

therefore, we can eliminate B, D, and E.

We also know from the passage that our answer must show the govt was NOT negligent, or NOT at fault.

Do A and C pass this test?

(A) - no, govt. repeatedly informed over several years.
(C) - yes, govt. is not at fault, only knew of problem for minutes.

eliminate (A), choose (C) as only answer to satisfy both conditions.

--Matt
  [#permalink] 22 May 2006, 14:51
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Current Undergrad Student- Any suggestions? OttoReadmore 4 11 Feb 2014, 23:13
2 Any current UCLA Anderson students? ko 3 05 Aug 2008, 16:36
Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville s current city council jyotsnasarabu 7 22 Nov 2006, 11:00
Currently, the city of Grimchester is liable for any injury chunjuwu 4 04 May 2005, 08:05
Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville's current city council kpadma 2 27 Aug 2004, 15:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Currently, the city of Grimchester is liable for any injury

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.