Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 27 Aug 2014, 13:02

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 97
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2006, 11:47
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
39. Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.

A. lobbied for stadiums with fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
B. lobbied for stadiums with less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
C. lobbied for stadiums that had fewer seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
D. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats to reduce supply and increase ticket prices.
E. lobbied for stadiums that had less seats as a means of reducing supply so they could increase ticket prices.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 348
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2006, 11:54
Should be A.

Fewer is the correct comparison.

Also, Had (in C,D and E) should only be used when there are multiple tenses and you are stressing that an event occured before another one in the past.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 2137
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2006, 12:02
agsfaltex wrote:
Should be A.

Fewer is the correct comparison.

Also, Had (in C,D and E) should only be used when there are multiple tenses and you are stressing that an event occured before another one in the past.


That's not entirely true. The "had" used in this sentence is not part of a past participle, but rather of simple past word for possession.

The tense is still iffy in the sentence's chronology, but don't confuse the two following examples:

I had lunch.

I had eaten lunch, when I became sick.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2006
Posts: 348
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 26 Sep 2006, 12:08
kidderek wrote:
agsfaltex wrote:
Should be A.

Fewer is the correct comparison.

Also, Had (in C,D and E) should only be used when there are multiple tenses and you are stressing that an event occured before another one in the past.


That's not entirely true. The "had" used in this sentence is not part of a past participle, but rather of simple past word for possession.

The tense is still iffy in the sentence's chronology, but don't confuse the two following examples:

I had lunch.

I had eaten lunch, when I became sick.


kidderek, you are right. I confused the two. In this case had is awkward contruction and has nothing to do with past participle.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2006, 08:13
seats are countable, so fewer is required here.

lobbied for X with Y ~ is succinct and idiomatic
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2006, 22:39
diegmat wrote:
Its A - but cant explain why its not C...

C is gramatically right, but its just a wordier version of A.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2006, 00:57
It's A
That the stadium has fewer seats is a fact, so we don't use "that had..." here
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 374
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2006, 01:16
Another one for A, fewer is correct usage. Don't think lobbied for... had makes sense.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 232
Location: Arkansas, US
WE 1: 2.5 yrs in manufacturing
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 18

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 29 Sep 2006, 01:49
Hey it's A

the reason it's not C is, C is in the past perfect tense. U should not try to use past perfect tense, unless U have no alternative but clarify some things.
Most often, simple past is recommended, which was followed in A.

Clarified..??
  [#permalink] 29 Sep 2006, 01:49
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for kidchaos 3 25 Sep 2010, 09:45
1 Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for tejal777 5 20 Oct 2009, 20:52
3 Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for bipolarbear 7 28 Jul 2009, 14:12
Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for gregspirited 5 19 Dec 2007, 09:59
Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for GMATT73 4 22 Aug 2006, 09:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Cynics charge that Major League Baseball lobbied for

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.