Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 May 2016, 05:55
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2005, 21:07
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statictics

Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate themselves naturally, nor even under the spur of nerve-growth stimulants. The reason, recently discovered, is the presence of nerve-growth inhibitors in the spinal cord. Antibodies that deactivate those inhibitors have now been developed. Clearly, then, nerve repair will be a standard medical procedure in the foreseeable future.
Which of the following, if true, casts the most serious doubt on the accuracy of the prediction above?

(A) Prevention of the regeneration of damaged nerves is merely a by-product of the main function in the human body of the substances inhibiting nerve growth.

(B) Certain nerve-growth stimulants have similar chemical structures to those of the antibodies against nerve-growth inhibitors.

(C) Nerves in the brain are similar to nerves in the spinal cord in their ability to regenerate themselves naturally.

(D) Researchers have been able to stimulate the growth of nerves not located in the spinal cord by using only nerve-growth stimulants.

(E) Deactivating the substances inhibiting nerve growth for an extended period would require a steady supply of antibodies.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1120
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Dec 2005, 23:32
A by POE.

(B) Certain nerve-growth stimulants have similar chemical structures to those of the antibodies against nerve-growth inhibitors.

spinal cord may regenerate natually.

(E) Deactivating the substances inhibiting nerve growth for an extended period would require a steady supply of antibodies.

argument does not tell scarcity of antibodies.
_________________

Whether you think you can or think you can't. You're right! - Henry Ford (1863 - 1947)

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Nov 2005
Posts: 231
Location: Germany
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Dec 2005, 12:44
I would also choose A because of POE.

Please post OA.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Dec 2005, 01:30
The OA is A.

I also got the answer correct by process of elimination.

Here is my reasoning.

Conclusion-Nerve repair will be standard medical procedure in the future
Evidence-because newly developed antibodies will deactivate inhibitors that block the spinal chord nerves from regenerating.
Assumption- blocking inhibitors will allow spinal chord nerves to regenerate

B-" certain" is too weak of an answer for weakening
Also, this is inconclusive. Antibodies deactivate the inhibitors. If some stimulants are similar in structure to the antibodies then, depending how many more stimulants there are than antibodies, there will be competition for the attachment to the inhibitors. If there are alot more antibodies than stimulants, then the arguement stays intact. If there are alot more stimulants than the antibodies, then most of the stimulants will attach to the inhibitors. thus, the antibodies can't deactivate the inhibitors.

C- OS,

D-OS, we talking about spinal chord nerves

E-No effect

A- It is possible that the inhibitors do other things in the human body. Lets say that it plays a part in breathing and needs to be activated. So if you deactivate the inhibitors, then something else goes wrong in another part. Therefore, this method might not be the best approach.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 209
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Dec 2005, 01:54
A as well.

Good explanation, guys
  [#permalink] 06 Dec 2005, 01:54
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
14 Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate OptimusPrimea1 13 13 Aug 2011, 11:13
Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate Jivana 6 11 Aug 2009, 19:43
9 Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate nitya34 45 19 Mar 2009, 00:45
Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate dancinggeometry 11 10 Sep 2008, 23:34
Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate amansingla4 5 25 Jun 2006, 01:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Damaged nerves in the spinal cord do not regenerate

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.