Data Sufficiency Trap ? : Quant Question Archive [LOCKED]
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 04:05

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Data Sufficiency Trap ?

Author Message
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 19
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2004, 04:05
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Hey there,

In the Courses>Quantitative Section>Data Sufficiency, the following example is posted :-

Example 1. Triangle ABC has one angle equal to 90 degrees and AB equal to 5 inches, what is the area of ABC?

(1) BC = 4
(2) AC = 12

The issue that is subsequently discussed is whether each statement is sufficient to answer the question and about the possibility of 3-4-5 or 5-12-13 triangles i.e a different solution per statement both right in themselves, but both don't talk simultaneously about the same triangle.

My question is : Aren't we making an unwarranted assumption based on "nice numbers" combinations ?

We directly consider AB=5 as the hypotenuse and then assume that BC=4 is one of the non-hypotenuse sides and arrive at the convenient conclusion that it must be a 3-4-5 triangle. What if AB=5 given is one of the non-hypotenuse sides and BC=4 is another non hypotenuse side ?

And similarly for the other triangle - it could be 5-12-13 but it also could be 5-10.909-12. So in this case the answer would have to be an E right ?

I think I may be missing something major otherwise it just doesn's seem to make sense to me....

Conal
Manager
Joined: 18 Sep 2004
Posts: 154
Location: Dallas, TX
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2004, 18:55
I agree, this problem is not of good quality and the sides do not refer to the same triangle. If we know that the length of a right triangle are 4, 5 and 12, then the angle opposite 12 must be the right angle as there cannot be another angle greater than 90 degree if one angle of 90 degree already exist. However 4^2 + 5^2 does not = 12^2, thus this question is not really valid... where did you get this anyway?...
Intern
Joined: 07 Oct 2004
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2004, 01:16
I think by knowing all you cant solve the problem ..4 sq + 5 sq not equal to 12 sq.

It you use any one of the side the you donâ€™t know the which angle A or B or C is 90 degree, Bâ€™coz in two case the area is Â½*5*4 and in one case it is Â½ *3*4

So we canâ€™t answer the probs.

I blv ans is E..
Intern
Joined: 29 Jun 2004
Posts: 19
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Where I got it from.... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Oct 2004, 08:06
I got the question from the course resources on this site.

http://www.gmatclub.com/content/courses/quantitative/ds.php

There's another DS problem that is wrongly solved as well. See my other post.

http://www.gmatclub.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=10603
Where I got it from....   [#permalink] 12 Oct 2004, 08:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by