Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 04 Jul 2015, 08:34

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Decreased production

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 166
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 134 [1] , given: 6

Decreased production [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 04:06
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (02:53) correct 44% (02:41) wrong based on 121 sessions
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Attachments

production.jpg
production.jpg [ 174.85 KiB | Viewed 1816 times ]


Last edited by vjsharma25 on 22 Mar 2011, 06:50, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 926
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 04:22
I think A is a dramatic weakener.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 166
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 6

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 04:50
gmat1220 wrote:
I think A is a dramatic weakener.

Its not.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 926
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 05:40
Govt control can forestall the fluctuations in the price. Is it B?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 166
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 6

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 05:50
gmat1220 wrote:
Govt control can forestall the fluctuations in the price. Is it B?

No.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 926
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 06:10
Demand and supply met. Causing the price to fall back. Is it D?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 93
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 10:25
i think the answer is C
the reason explained in the text why the price of rice increased is because government growers stored all the grain to distribute to local consumption instead of selling in the world market.

C gives out another reason saying that its not because growers in the country stored it, its because government sold all the rice into another countries so the supply now decreased and this caused the price to increase.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Matriculating
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 926
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 233 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 23:13
This is not realistic. I think the author of this question made a lot of bookish assumptions.

Posted from my mobile device Image
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2010
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 22 Mar 2011, 23:26
I Believe the answer is C:
The premise of the argument is that there is little amount of rice supply for commercial purpose-for instance if 90% of worldwide rice production is controlled by growers/governments for local consumption, then analysts argue that there is not enough supply of freely traded rice.
C: States that in times of decreased rice production, government growers sale some of the rice destined for local consumption/storage at the free market-This clearly weakens the argument's conclusion.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2010
Posts: 121
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2011, 18:26
The answer is C
The analysts blame the casue of price rise on the fact that the grains are stored for local use and little is given away for world market.

This argument can be weakened, if the grains stored for local use is given to the world market which is what option C talks about. Hence the answer!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 437
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 16

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 25 Mar 2011, 22:39
The author of the argument implies that because so little rice is traded freely in world markets, the price of rice increases dramatically in world markets in times of production shortfall.

Answ C says that governments will sell some of the rice they store for local consumption in times of production shortfall. However, selling some rice in world markets governments not necessarily cause the price of rice to fall. Imagine, what each government decides to sell only 1% of the rice they store for local consumption. It would be very little increase in demand to satisfy the demand when the production of rice falls and supply is not enough to cover the demand. Thus even though C is correct it does not weaken the author's explanation of why the world prices on rice increase.

Answ D clearly weakens the explanation of the author. Author believes that because governments keep locally produced rice out of world market that is why the price of rice rises in times of production shortfall. What if the governments buy the rice commercially from world market. That would attack the author's explanation by attacking one of the premises.

To understand:

Author believes that:

Production Shortfall---->Gov-t keeps rice out of world market to distribute locally -----> the supply of rice in the world market falls-----> price of rice rises

If D is correct:

Production Shortfall----> supply of rice in world market falls-----> government buys rice commercially from the market--->demand for rice rises-----> price of rice rises

So, D clearly weakens the explanation of the author.
_________________

Never give up,,,

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 500
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 149

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 08 Apr 2011, 00:30
A can be a weakener if we assume that the governments anticipating a drop in demand for grain in the world markets withhold stocks of grain ,thus decreasing the grain supply to the world markets.
Can someone confirm ?
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2010
Posts: 166
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 134 [0], given: 6

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 08 Apr 2011, 01:14
mundasingh123 wrote:
A can be a weakener if we assume that the governments anticipating a drop in demand for grain in the world markets withhold stocks of grain ,thus decreasing the grain supply to the world markets.
Can someone confirm ?

IMO A is stating after effects of the price increase. We need to weaken the why the price increased,which this options fails to do.This option states that due to price increase rice-importing countries decrease their intake. So not a weakener.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 8

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 08 Apr 2011, 01:17
iMO C too .

BTW whats the OA ?
VP
VP
avatar
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1358
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 168 [0], given: 10

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 08 Apr 2011, 03:46
Argument - As governments control most of the Rice crop for local market,a deficit in production will lead to Short fall in World Market.

Requirement - Look for an option which shows that the world market will not be effected with such a short fall in production.

A Topic scribes the World Market,not just the countries which import.Hence nullified.
B It doesn't even discuss about the world market. Hence,nullified.

C Governments participate and supply Rice crop at times of short fall. Hence, the world market may not be effected by the current short fall.

Thus C is a clear winner.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 500
WE 1: 4 years Tech
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 149

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 08 Apr 2011, 03:52
vjsharma25 wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:
A can be a weakener if we assume that the governments anticipating a drop in demand for grain in the world markets withhold stocks of grain ,thus decreasing the grain supply to the world markets.
Can someone confirm ?

IMO A is stating after effects of the price increase. We need to weaken the why the price increased,which this options fails to do.This option states that due to price increase rice-importing countries decrease their intake. So not a weakener.

Agreed that A is stating after effects of the price increase.
What if
1)the Govt Growers knew beforehand that A would hold true in case there is a price increase .
and then
2) The Govt decides to hold back stock in anticipation of reduced demand
_________________

My Post Invites Discussions not answers
Try to give back something to the Forum.I want your explanations, right now !
Please let me know your opinion about the Chandigarh Gmat Centrehttp://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-experience-at-chandigarh-india-centre-111830.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 268
Schools: Columbia, INSEAD, RSM, LBS
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 62 [0], given: 4

Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 08 Apr 2011, 07:00
C
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4372
Followers: 472

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Decreased production [#permalink] New post 19 Nov 2014, 07:58
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: Decreased production   [#permalink] 19 Nov 2014, 07:58
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Innovations in production technology and decreases in the Practicegmat 5 13 Nov 2011, 04:35
Experts publish their posts in the topic Innovations in production technology and decreases in the tarek99 11 01 Dec 2007, 12:27
Normally, increases in the price of a product decrease its freetheking 16 28 Jul 2006, 17:06
On the basis of a decrease in the college-age population, mahesh004 15 19 Nov 2005, 09:10
Innovations in production technology and decreases in the qpoo 15 14 Aug 2005, 21:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Decreased production

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.