Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 15:47

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Defendants who can afford expensive private defense lawyers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 675 [0], given: 781

Defendants who can afford expensive private defense lawyers [#permalink] New post 27 Sep 2003, 10:23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:52) wrong based on 7 sessions
23. Defendants who can afford expensive private defense lawyers have a lower conviction rate than those who rely on court-appointed public defenders. This explains why criminals who commit lucrative crimes like embezzlement or insider trading are more successful at avoiding conviction than are street criminals.

The explanation offered above would be more persuasive if which one of the following were true?

(A) Many street crimes, such as drug dealing, are extremely lucrative and those committing them can afford expensive private lawyers.

(B) Most prosecutors are not competent to handle cases involving highly technical financial evidence and have more success in prosecuting cases of robbery or simple assault.

(C) The number of criminals convicted of street crimes is far greater than the number of criminals convicted of embezzlement or insider trading.

(D) The percentage of defendants who actually committed the crimes of which they are accused is no greater fro publicly defended than for privately defended defendants.

(E) Juries, out of sympathy for the victims of crimes, are much more likely to convict defendants accused of violent crimes than they are to convict defendants accused of ┬б┬░victimless┬б┬▒ crimes or crimes against property.
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 675 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2003, 08:16
stolyar wrote:
also vote for D.


Could you explain your choice please?
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1613
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 28 Sep 2003, 10:24
My rationale: the argument boils down to—expensive private lawyers are the reason for a low conviction rate among financial criminals.
We have to strengthen this assertion. How to strengthen? Prove that there are no other reasons. D says that two groups initially have equal chances to be convicted, so expensive lawyers are the reason for a lower rate among the group of financial criminals.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jan 2010
Posts: 128
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 12

Re: CR : Defendants [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2010, 11:46
d
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Joined: 17 Jul 2010
Posts: 693
Schools: Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&Gas
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 15

Re: CR : Defendants [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2010, 12:14
Also I see that D is the only option talking about public defenders and private lawyers... That should make it stand out ..

Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

Consider kudos, they are good for health

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 995
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 422 [0], given: 36

Re: CR : Defendants [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2010, 21:08
1000% D
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 334
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 7

Re: CR : Defendants [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2010, 22:27
1001% D :-)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Posts: 108
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Defendants [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2010, 13:17
D IMO
Re: CR : Defendants   [#permalink] 27 Aug 2010, 13:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Defendants who can afford expensive private defense lawyers hibloom 3 31 Jul 2008, 04:34
The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the FN 8 02 Jun 2008, 21:29
The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the beckee529 8 27 Jul 2007, 20:54
The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the hisharma 4 27 Aug 2006, 01:10
The lawyer for the defense charged that she suspected the ong 15 03 Nov 2005, 14:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Defendants who can afford expensive private defense lawyers

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.