Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Dec 2014, 10:10

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
4 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Posts: 605
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 57 [4] , given: 0

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2004, 05:14
4
This post received
KUDOS
29
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (02:07) correct 59% (01:21) wrong based on 1801 sessions
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by saurya_s on 21 Jun 2005, 13:10, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Hanoi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2004, 05:48
It can't be B cuz it change the meaning. I see no wrong with A.
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4315
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2004, 05:52
I would go with A for conciseness.
B's "to an allergy to some food" seems wordy to me
C) relative pronoun "that" is not required and actually makes it wordier
D and E are redundant for when you attribute X to Y, you don't need to say "attribute X as the cause of Y"
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 218
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2004, 05:55
I believe it's B

A,C,D are all wrong because they use "in attributing" without specifying WHO is attributing
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 267
Location: Hanoi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2004, 06:01
OlegC wrote:
I believe it's B

A,C,D are all wrong because they use "in attributing" without specifying WHO is attributing


Sorry. But in other choices, the use of "if" is awful
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

11 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 42
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [11] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2004, 06:12
11
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
D and E are out because they do not use a right idiom (to attribute x to y).
A and C are out because they sound like perpetrators are the ones who attribute behavior to allergy. I think the ones who attribute behavior to allergy in the SC are attorneys.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4315
Followers: 24

Kudos [?]: 189 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2004, 06:40
DMJ wrote:
D and E are out because they do not use a right idiom (to attribute x to y).
A and C are out because they sound like perpetrators are the ones who attribute behavior to allergy. I think the ones who attribute behavior to allergy in the SC are attorneys.

Nice DMJ, yes, your explanation is the reason why A is rejected.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5081
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 165 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Sep 2004, 17:25
1
This post received
KUDOS
by attributing, not in attributing, so (A), (C), (E) are out.

(D) is out, food allergy is attributed to be the cause, not as the cause
(B) for me.
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [1] , given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 May 2005, 15:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
I wanted to pour in my explaination for this question just to consolidate in my mind:

Idiom Usage:
1. One attributes X, an effect, to Y, a cause
2. X (an effect) is attributed to Y.

(D) : wrong Idiom usage
(E) : wrong Idiom usage
(C): Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food, the perpeptrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

Now lets see Independent sentence starting with but:
in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food, the perpeptrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions

"in attributing..." : Prepositional Phrase is modifying immediate Noun i.e. Perpetrators and thus conveying wrong meaning. So, this choice is wrong.

(A): wrong : same as (C).
(B): Correct of the lot.


However, it is quite confusing/awkward to use "but" alongwith "if".

What do you guys think?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 294
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 May 2005, 05:06
Yes, if & but are coordinating conjuctions. I had read somewhere that they should not be placed together.

What is the OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 294
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 May 2005, 21:55
Sorry, I was wrong, 'if' is not a coordinating conjuction. :(
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 781
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their [#permalink] New post 17 May 2007, 02:35
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpe¬trators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

Please explain.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 152
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Defense attorneys [#permalink] New post 17 May 2007, 03:29
vshaunak@gmail.com wrote:
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients' misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpe¬trators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy => unclear meaning
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food => awkward
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior => awkward

Please explain.


(B) it is

Between (B) and (D), (B) wins because of right idom ( ... attributed to ...)
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 257 [0], given: 1

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2008, 01:22
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy

(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food

(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food

(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior




Can someone please provide me with a grammatical explanation to this question? what is it testing here cause I got it wrong. thanks
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 257 [0], given: 1

Re: SC: Defense Attorneys [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2008, 08:05
OA is B
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 560
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 119 [0], given: 2

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2008, 09:20
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior

stuck between B and C. Please help. Thanks :)
Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3576
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 386

Kudos [?]: 1947 [0], given: 359

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: SC - attorney [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2008, 09:54
Expert's post
For me, B is concise and 'an allergy to some food' is less ambiguous than 'some food allergy'.
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

3 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2007
Posts: 759
Location: Oxford
Schools: Oxford'10
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 179 [3] , given: 8

Re: SC - attorney [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2008, 10:00
3
This post received
KUDOS
to add to walker's explanation, "Attributed To" is the correct idiom here.

also the choices starting with "in attributing.." make it sound like the perpetrators are doing the "attributing"
Expert Post
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3576
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Followers: 386

Kudos [?]: 1947 [0], given: 359

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: SC - attorney [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2008, 10:10
Expert's post
Thanks Buffdaddy, I compared B and D rather than B and C... :?
_________________

HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android) - The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a must-have app especially if you aim at 700+ | PrepGame

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 1

Re: SC - attorney [#permalink] New post 02 Jun 2008, 11:38
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.

Note - The conjuction 'but' is followed by an independent clause

(A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy - is a modifier and the noun following it should be the attorneys because it's the attorneys who are attributing criminal behavior to some food allergy, not the perpetrators.

(B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food

(C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food - also a modifier and has the same flaw as answer choice 'A'.

(D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior - Idiom. Attributed to

(E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior - Same as 'A'.

Ans is B
Re: SC - attorney   [#permalink] 02 Jun 2008, 11:38
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Defense Attorneys have occasionally argued that their abgo 0 05 Jun 2010, 08:10
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their mymba99 0 03 Jun 2008, 14:55
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their tarek99 0 12 Jan 2008, 08:05
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their vshaunak@gmail.com 0 17 May 2007, 12:01
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their saurya_s 0 03 May 2005, 04:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2   3   4   5   6    Next  [ 116 posts ] 



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.