Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 00:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2008
Posts: 376
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 01:18
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

76% (02:27) correct 24% (01:29) wrong based on 364 sessions
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 41
Page: 132
Difficulty:


Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes can become contaminated with bacterial that cause pneumonia and strep throat. They found that contamination usually occurs after toothbrushes have been used for four weeks. For that reason, people should replace their toothbrushes at least once a month.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?

(A) The dental researchers could not discover why toothbrush contamination usually occurred only after toothbrushes had been used for four weeks.

(B) The dental researchers failed to investigate contamination of toothbrushes by viruses, yeasts, and other pathogenic microorganisms.

(C) The dental researchers found that among people who used toothbrushes contaminated with bacterial that cause pneumonia and strep throat, the incidence of these diseases was no higher than among people who used uncontaminated toothbrushes.

(D) The dental researchers found that people who rinsed their toothbrushes thoroughly in hot water after each use were as likely to have contaminated toothbrushes as were people who only rinsed their toothbrushes hurriedly in cold water after each use.

(E) The dental researchers found that, after six weeks of use, greater length of use of a toothbrush did not correlate with a higher number of bacterial being present.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Narenn on 07 Oct 2013, 09:44, edited 3 times in total.
Necessary Corrections for Official Guide Verbal Review 2nd Edition Project
Kaplan Promo CodeKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 319
Location: Hungary
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 3

Re: CR: Dental researchers [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 01:35
I think the answer is C. I am not 100% sure.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1593
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 2

Re: CR: Dental researchers [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 03:53
i am also leaning towards C. The researches are saying to replace the tootbrush once a month in order to avoid being affected by the viruses ... to weaken, we are basically saying that regardless of whether brush is replaced or not, rate of getting the virus is the same
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1893
Location: Oklahoma City
Schools: Hard Knocks
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 439 [0], given: 32

Re: CR: Dental researchers [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2008, 05:14
E

vksunder wrote:
Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes can become contaminated wth bacterial that
cause pneumonia and strep throat. They found that contamination usually occurs after toothbrushes have been
used for four weeks. For that reason, people should replace their toothbrushes at least once a month.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
(A) The dental researchers could not discover why toothbrush contamination usually occurred only after toothbrushes had been used for four weeks.
Not knowing why doesn't attack the basis for the conclusion. It just means it happens, but we don't know why. No reason to think they're wrong.
(B) The dental researchers failed to investigate contamination of toothbrushes by viruses, yeasts, and other pathogenic microorganisms.
Out of scope. It doesn't matter that they failed to investigate other contamination, the focus is on the contamination they DID find.
(C) The dental researchers found that among people who used toothbrushes contaminated with bacterial that cause pneumonia and strep throat, the incidence of these diseases was no higher than among people who used uncontaminated toothbrushes.
This is a close one, but in the end incorrect. The premise of the stem is all about the length of time the person uses the toothbrush. That is not mentioned at all here. It does weaken, but E weakens more because it undercuts the basic reason for the stem's conclusion.
(D) The dental researchers found that people who rinsed their toothbrushes thoroughly in hot water after each use were as likely to have contaminated toothbrushes as were people who only rinsed their toothbrushes hurriedly in cold water after each use.
Out of Scope. This has nothing to do the length of time the toothbrush is used. This has to do with a variable that changes from person to person. The length of use has to do with every toothbrush user. This doesn't weaken the stem.
(E) The dental researchers found that, after six weeks of use, greater length of use of a toothbrush did not correlate with a higher number of bacterial being present.
This undercuts the premise of the stem by saying that after 6 weeks of use, there is no difference between toothbrushes. Sure their correlation worked after 4 weeks, but any variation was completely gone within 2 more weeks and their conclusion that we should toss the toothbrush after 4 weeks is invalid because it doesn't hold true after 6 weeks.

_________________

------------------------------------
J Allen Morris
**I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a$$.

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 206
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 5

Re: Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2012, 09:57
I have chosen the answer C for this question:

The underlying assumption in the passage is that contamination with bacteria can cause illness among individuals. Therefore, we should be switching toothbrushes once a month to avoid this.

A. The fact that dental researchers could not discover why contamination happens does not matter because the contamination still happens and can cause illness. Therefore, individuals should still replace their toothbrushes. This answer choice does not weaken the argument.

B. This is irrelevant - we do not care that dental researchers did not investigate other types of contamination.

C. This is the correct answer. If individuals who use toothbrushes that are contaminated do not get any sicker than individuals who use uncontaminated toothbrushes, then changing the toothbrush every month is unnecessary.

D. This somewhat supports the argument because careful cleaning of the toothbrush does nothing to eliminate the contamination, so people should be continually changing toothbrushes.

E. The fact that the amount of bacteria did not increase does not weaken the argument. The reason is because there is still a certain amount of bacteria on the toothbrush that could cause illness to individuals.
Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Followers: 308

Kudos [?]: 485 [3] , given: 2

CAT Tests
Re: Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2012, 11:14
3
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Conclusion: People should throw away their toothbrushes after only four weeks of use.

Reasoning: In that time, enough bacteria has accumulated to cause strep throat and pneumonia.

To WEAKEN this argument we will need an answer choice that suggests we should not dispose of our 4-week old toothbrushes.

It seems that debate here is between (C) and (E), so I will focus on these two answer choices.

(C) The dental researchers found that among people who used toothbrushes contaminated with bacteria that
cause pneumonia and strep throat, the incidence of these diseases was no higher than among people who
used uncontaminated toothbrushes.


Contaminated toothbrushes, i.e. those brushes with bacteria, are no more likely to cause strep throat than non-contaminated toothbrushes. Therefore, one should not throw away their 4-week old toothbrushes. ANSWER.


(E) The dental researchers found that, after six weeks of use, greater length of use of a toothbrush did not
correlate with a higher number of bacterial being present.

Let's say I have a contaminated 4-week old toothbrush, on which a small colony bacteria has grown. If I do not throw the toothbrush away, I am likely to get strep throat. Nevertheless, I continue using the toothbrush for another two weeks. Now at week 6 the colony of bacteria is still there. According to answer (E) the colony has not grown (greater length of use of a toothbrush did not correlate...)

Of course I should still throw the toothbrush away because it is contaminated. Remember, we have to find an answer choice that suggests that it makes no sense throwing our toothbrush away. (E) however suggests that we should still throw the toothbrush away at week 6, regardless of whether it is less contaminated than it was at week 4.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep


Image

Image

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 486
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 440 [0], given: 247

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2013, 02:00
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

New project from GMAT Club! Click here


_________________

How to CHOOSE your Business School
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum
When you post a question Pls. Provide its source & TAG your questions
Avoid posting from unreliable sources such as 1000 series.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Bouncing back from failure
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 100
Schools: Wharton,MIT, Tepper, Kelly,
WE 1: 7 years- Service Managament, poject Management, Business Consultant- Retail
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 24

Reviews Badge
Re: Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes [#permalink] New post 03 Jul 2014, 05:56
vksunder wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 41
Page: 132
Difficulty:


Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes can become contaminated with bacterial that cause pneumonia and strep throat. They found that contamination usually occurs after toothbrushes have been used for four weeks. For that reason, people should replace their toothbrushes at least once a month.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?

(A) The dental researchers could not discover why toothbrush contamination usually occurred only after toothbrushes had been used for four weeks.

(B) The dental researchers failed to investigate contamination of toothbrushes by viruses, yeasts, and other pathogenic microorganisms.

(C) The dental researchers found that among people who used toothbrushes contaminated with bacterial that cause pneumonia and strep throat, the incidence of these diseases was no higher than among people who used uncontaminated toothbrushes.

(D) The dental researchers found that people who rinsed their toothbrushes thoroughly in hot water after each use were as likely to have contaminated toothbrushes as were people who only rinsed their toothbrushes hurriedly in cold water after each use.

(E) The dental researchers found that, after six weeks of use, greater length of use of a toothbrush did not correlate with a higher number of bacterial being present.


This is a good causal problem

Contaminated brush (X) caused pneumonia and step throat (Y) . One way to weaken the causal issue is

Even if cause does occurs effect occurs (No X ---> still Y)
Ans C says that even uncontaminated brush cased pneumonia and step throat (Y)

Therefore C is clear answer
Re: Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes   [#permalink] 03 Jul 2014, 05:56
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Recent dental research shows that bacteria around the gum vmdce129907 7 01 Oct 2012, 10:00
Experts publish their posts in the topic A medical research team in France recently discovered that pratk 5 16 Jan 2012, 09:53
Researchers discovered that the failure of legislation eyunni 3 03 Nov 2007, 19:17
Researchers have recently discovered that people with low keirin79 3 17 Jul 2005, 07:22
Dental researcher: Filling a cavity in a tooth is not a batliwala 1 02 Nov 2004, 01:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Dental researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.