Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

I have been wondering about his for quite a while...needed [#permalink]
09 Oct 2010, 11:09

I have been wondering about his for quite a while...needed to get it clarified For students like me (INDIAN) who are to appear for tests in addition to the GMAT (like the IIM CAT-2010), some of the topics in QUANT are very advanced as compared to those that appear on the GMAT... For eg: In Geometry, there might be certain theorems like the Basic Proportionality Theorem etc. which aid problem solving... However, in the GMAT I believe the stress is not on a lot of theorems and formulas, but general problem solving..

So lets say on the GMAT, I get a DS question asking me to solve a particular problem on, lets say, Geometry...and I, being an Indian student, know that it can easily be solved by using the said theorem and suppose with that knowledge I get a answer B ( by finding that it is sufficient to answer the question with statement 2 alone ).

Now it is possible for another student, who knows nothing about the above mentioned theorem ( has never learned anything of the sort in his entire prep), solves the DS question and gets an answer C ( that is by using both the statements 1 & 2 ),

I have taken Geometry as a topic only for stating an example. It might occur in other topics too.

My questions are - 1) Can such a situation happen on the GMAT? 2) If it does, then what is the solution?

Re: Depth of Knowledge tested at GMAT - Need clarification [#permalink]
09 Oct 2010, 14:23

rahuljaiswal wrote:

I have been wondering about his for quite a while...needed to get it clarified For students like me (INDIAN) who are to appear for tests in addition to the GMAT (like the IIM CAT-2010), some of the topics in QUANT are very advanced as compared to those that appear on the GMAT... For eg: In Geometry, there might be certain theorems like the Basic Proportionality Theorem etc. which aid problem solving... However, in the GMAT I believe the stress is not on a lot of theorems and formulas, but general problem solving..

So lets say on the GMAT, I get a DS question asking me to solve a particular problem on, lets say, Geometry...and I, being an Indian student, know that it can easily be solved by using the said theorem and suppose with that knowledge I get a answer B ( by finding that it is sufficient to answer the question with statement 2 alone ).

Now it is possible for another student, who knows nothing about the above mentioned theorem ( has never learned anything of the sort in his entire prep), solves the DS question and gets an answer C ( that is by using both the statements 1 & 2 ),

I have taken Geometry as a topic only for stating an example. It might occur in other topics too.

My questions are - 1) Can such a situation happen on the GMAT? 2) If it does, then what is the solution?

R J

No, this can never happen

All the extra theorems you learn will at best help you get to the answer quicker (very rarely have I even seen that), you won't ever get a completely different answer ... math is math ... knowing a few extra theorems doesn't change the end result. _________________

Re: Depth of Knowledge tested at GMAT - Need clarification [#permalink]
09 Oct 2010, 22:19

[/quote]

No, this can never happen

All the extra theorems you learn will at best help you get to the answer quicker (very rarely have I even seen that), you won't ever get a completely different answer ... math is math ... knowing a few extra theorems doesn't change the end result.[/quote]

Hi Shrouded, thanks for the clarification... What I basically wanted to question here is the scope of study on GMAT...and my doubt was over DS questions only (citing the above reasons) ...not problem solving ones...

Re: Depth of Knowledge tested at GMAT - Need clarification [#permalink]
09 Oct 2010, 23:52

Well, if you are studying for the CAT anyway, then the extra knowledge will only help.

But as such the "scope" is less. And again, PS or DS, what I said is still applicable. At best, you might use a concept to get to the right answer quicker once in a while, you'll never to get to a different answer than someone who doesn't know it. _________________

Re: Depth of Knowledge tested at GMAT - Need clarification [#permalink]
10 Oct 2010, 01:48

shrouded1 wrote:

Well, if you are studying for the CAT anyway, then the extra knowledge will only help.

But as such the "scope" is less. And again, PS or DS, what I said is still applicable. At best, you might use a concept to get to the right answer quicker once in a while, you'll never to get to a different answer than someone who doesn't know it.

Re: Depth of Knowledge tested at GMAT - Need clarification [#permalink]
12 Oct 2010, 01:14

Totally agree with above commments. GMAT wont frame question where extra quant knwoledge will help with answering questions. If I remember correctly... trignometry is not mentioned in the OG but it is very easy to learn and helpful in answering questions..

gmatclubot

Re: Depth of Knowledge tested at GMAT - Need clarification
[#permalink]
12 Oct 2010, 01:14

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...