Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 03:28

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Described as intemperate and abusive, an extensive and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 213
Location: Uzbekistan
Schools: Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
WE 3: 10
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 206 [0], given: 974

GMAT Tests User
Described as intemperate and abusive, an extensive and [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2011, 07:24
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (02:08) correct 55% (01:15) wrong based on 22 sessions
Described as intemperate and abusive, an extensive and independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United States documented surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges, documenting judges with denial rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.

(A) Described as intemperate and abusive, an independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United States documented surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges, including rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.
(B) Described as intemperate and abusive, surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges that include rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent were analyzed ndependently.
(C) An independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United Sates documented surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges described as intemperate and abusive that include rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.
(D) According to an independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United Sates, individual judges described as intemperate and abusive showed surprising inconsistencies in denial rates, including rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.
(E) According to an independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United States, judges displayed surprising inconsistencies in denial rates re; as intemperate and abusive, including rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Expert Post
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2266
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 263

Kudos [?]: 1592 [0], given: 249

Re: Modifiers question [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2011, 08:52
Expert's post
(A) Described as intemperate and abusive, an independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United States documented surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges, including rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent. Improper modification of ‘an independent analysis’ by ‘intemperate and abusive’


(B) ‘Described as intemperate and abusive, surprising inconsistencies’ in the denial rates of individual judges that include rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent were analyzed independently.---- Improper modification of intemperate and abusive by surprising inconsistencies


(C) An independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United Sates documented surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual ‘judges described as intemperate and abusive that include rates’ as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent. Judges that include rates? Illogical.


(D) According to an independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United Sates, individual judges described as intemperate and abusive showed surprising inconsistencies in ‘denial rates, including rates’ as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent. Judges described as intemperate and abusive – correct modification; denial rates including rates – correctly describes the inconsistencies. Right choice


(E) According to an independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United States, judges displayed surprising inconsistencies in ‘denial rates re; as intemperate and abusive, including rates’ as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent. Intemperate and abusive modifying rates rather than judges. Improper modification
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership


Last edited by daagh on 10 Mar 2011, 05:42, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 264
Schools: UC Berkley, UCLA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 66

Re: Modifiers question [#permalink] New post 26 Jan 2011, 12:38
feruz77 wrote:
Described as intemperate and abusive, an extensive and independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United States documented surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges, documenting judges with denial rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.

(A) Described as intemperate and abusive, an independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United States documented surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges, including rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.
(B) Described as intemperate and abusive, surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges that include rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent were analyzed ndependently.
(C) An independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United Sates documented surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges described as intemperate and abusive that include rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.
(D) According to an independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United Sates, individual judges described as intemperate and abusive showed surprising inconsistencies in denial rates, including rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.
(E) According to an independent analysis of over 297,000 requests for asylum in the United States, judges displayed surprising inconsistencies in denial rates re; as intemperate and abusive, including rates as low as 10 percent and as high as 98 percent.


A is wrong because "Described as intemperate and abusive" describes "an independent analysis" that wouldn't make any sense because analysis cannot abuse or be intemperate. Those are human traits. So let's try to find nouns that would fit more appropriately in that kind of sentence.

B is wrong, again for the same reasons except this time the two adjectives are describing inconsistencies - non-sense, right? Let's move on to the next question.

C is also wrong because the way the sentence is constructed gives the sentence a different meaning, "surprising inconsistencies in the denial rates of individual judges described as intemperate and abusive" if you cross out the object of the preposition (of individual judges) you will see that the denial rates of individual judges are (wrongly) described as intemperate and abusive. C is out.

E is wrong because the construction is awkward in that it would have been better constructed had the adjectives (intemperate and abusive) been closer to the noun (judges) that they're supposed to describe.

D has a clear and concise construction and therefore is the correct answer.
_________________

Thank you for your kudoses Everyone!!!


"It always seems impossible until its done."
-Nelson Mandela

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 190
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 20

GMAT Tests User
Re: Modifiers question [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2011, 12:25
Only D does not have modifier problem.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2011
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 7

Re: Modifiers question [#permalink] New post 09 Mar 2011, 04:17
I went ahead with C..But convinced wid D. :(
Re: Modifiers question   [#permalink] 09 Mar 2011, 04:17
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
request of extension tt11234 2 01 Sep 2010, 08:16
Equestrian enthusiasts predict that the alleged abuse of dare2 4 19 Jul 2010, 10:40
telephone extensions tejal777 0 09 Jun 2009, 15:29
1 extension courses isa 19 05 May 2008, 13:57
effects of drug and alcohol abuse pi10t 6 02 Sep 2007, 20:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Described as intemperate and abusive, an extensive and

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.