Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Sep 2014, 12:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Detective: Because the embezzler must have had specialized

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 43
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Nonprofit
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 3

Detective: Because the embezzler must have had specialized [#permalink] New post 21 May 2012, 23:54
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (02:38) correct 52% (01:41) wrong based on 149 sessions
Detective: Because the embezzler must have had specialized knowledge and access to internal financial records, we can presume that the embezzler worked for XYZ Corp as either an accountant or an actuary. But an accountant would probably not make the kind of mistakes in ledger entries that led to the discovery of the embezzlement. Thus it is likely the the embezzler is one of the actuaries.

Each of the following weakens the the detective's argument EXCEPT:

A. The actuaries' activities while working for XYZ corp were more closely scrutinized by supervisors than were the activities of accountants.
B. There is evidence of breaches in computer security at the time of embezzlement that could have given persons outside XYZ access to internal financial record.
C. XYZ employs 8 accountants whereas it has only 2 actuaries on it's staff.
D. An independent report released before the crime took place concluded that XYZ was vulnerable to embezzlement.
E. Certain security measures at XYZ made it more difficult for the actuaries to have access to internal financial records than for the accountants
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Posts: 123
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
GMAT 1: 680 Q50 V31
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT 3: 710 Q49 V39
WE: Design (Manufacturing)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 12

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Actuaries vs. Accountants: CR [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 00:42
D
the option does not have any effect on the conclusion ie . It neither supports nor weakens the conclusion.

Hope that helps!!!:D

Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

Work with hope in Heart and dreams in the eyes .... And leave the mind for GMAT problems ;)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 43
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Nonprofit
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 3

Re: Actuaries vs. Accountants: CR [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 00:54
What about B that also effects neither the actuaries nor the accountants so isn't it a bit similar to D in reasoning?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 160
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 11

Re: Actuaries vs. Accountants: CR [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 01:06
vasureddy18 wrote:
D
the option does not have any effect on the conclusion ie . It neither supports nor weakens the conclusion.

Hope that helps!!!:D

Posted from my mobile device Image


which is not weakening = has no effect? can't it be supporting?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 336
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 33

Re: Actuaries vs. Accountants: CR [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 03:39
IMO it should be C. the number of accountants or actuaries has no impact on the case. An independent assessment says vulnerable to embezzlement could also mean from external sources. what say guys why do you think C is wrong?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 336
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 33

Re: Actuaries vs. Accountants: CR [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 03:43
ok my analysis of the arg is :
Conclusion: actuaries did the embezzlement and not accountants. premise ledger entries were flawed.
A: actuaries scrutinized more so means it was difficult for them to embezzle. Weakens
B: says the breach was external means actuaries are not responsible. weakens
C: IMO right answer
D: independent assessment says system vulnerable - (may be external threats )
E: it was not possible for actuaries to access data - weakens
Current Student
User avatar
Affiliations: UWC
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 399
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE: Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 246 [0], given: 100

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: Actuaries vs. Accountants: CR [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 03:58
I chose C and got it wrong but now when I think about it perhaps C does weaken the argument a 'little'.
The argument states that it is likely that the culprit is an actuary. However if all else is equal, statement C tells us that the likelihood of the culprit being an accountant is higher because there are more of them.
Basically, C weakens the argument by bringing in a new idea, not by attacking the authors assumptions.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 336
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 33

Re: Actuaries vs. Accountants: CR [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 19:07
I think this question stem is not up to GMAT standards. I mean for both options C&D. We are assuming things not mentioned in the answer options.
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 34 [1] , given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: Actuaries vs. Accountants: CR [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 21:23
1
This post received
KUDOS
A. Weakens the arguement
B. Accountants are considered insiders who have access to financial records whereas Actuaries are considered outsiders - weakens the arguement
C.8 accountants, 2 actuaries - Numbers dont necessarily mean that 2 Actuaries cannot commit the crime. - Doubtful option
D. Neutral stand - Does not qualify to have a positive or negative stand
E. Weakens the arguement.

Can be between C and D.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1726
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 66

Kudos [?]: 302 [0], given: 109

GMAT Tests User
Re: Actuaries vs. Accountants: CR [#permalink] New post 22 May 2012, 21:42
+1 D

Choice D doesn't provide information about who would be more likely of being guilty.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 271
GMAT 1: 750 Q V
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 6

Re: Detective: Because the embezzler must have had specialized [#permalink] New post 08 Jul 2012, 18:33
+1 D.

That option supports neither accountants nor actuaries.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 905
Concentration: General Management, General Management
Schools: ISB '16
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 312

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Detective: Because the embezzler must have had specialized [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2013, 21:43
Just want to clear some air regarding the option (C).

Conclusion mentions "likely" ,which means probability.Therefore, if the number of actuary is less than the number of accountants then actuary is less likely the culprit.


Well that will help surely
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Re: Detective: Because the embezzler must have had specialized   [#permalink] 28 Feb 2013, 21:43
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Diamonds are almost impossible to detect directly because roopika2990 6 05 Feb 2013, 04:26
3 The impostor eluded detection for so long because she pavanpaone 7 29 Dec 2012, 11:09
Because people are generally better at detecting mistakes in bidmanager 3 03 Oct 2011, 11:34
The impostor eluded detection for so long because she pzazz12 8 08 Oct 2010, 05:05
Detective: Because the embezzler must have had specialized gmataquaguy 14 04 Sep 2005, 18:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Detective: Because the embezzler must have had specialized

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.