Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 19:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 275
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 2

Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian [#permalink] New post 15 Mar 2007, 15:38
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian artifacts is never easy. Carbon-14 dating of these artifacts is often impossible due to contamination by radioactive palladium (which occurs naturally in the soils of Central and South America). However, historians and anthropologists have evolved two reliable criteria, which, utilized in combination, have proven effective for dating these artifacts. First, because authentic pre-Columbian artifacts characteristically occur in a coarse, granular matrix that is shifted by major earthquakes, they often exhibit the unique scratch patterns known as gridding. In addition, true pre-Columbian artifacts show a darkening in surface color that is caused by centuries of exposure to the minute amounts of magnesium in the soil of the Americas.

The criteria above would be LEAST useful in judging the authenticity of which of the following?

(A) An ax head of black obsidian, unearthed from a kitchen midden
(B) A pottery bowl with a red ocher design, found in the ruins of a temple
(C) A set of gold ear weights, ornamented with jasper pendants
(D) A black feather cape from a king’s burial vault
(E) A multicolored woven sash found near the gravesite of a slave
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 299
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2007, 06:00
I would have to go with D here.

The artifact must have been in the earth. If it was in a vault, most likely it was in a room protected from contact with the soil, and from the shifting earth.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 56
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2007, 07:06
D or B. Most likely D.

Both artifacts seems to be protected from the elements. Even though the pottery is found in the ruins, it may have more contct with the elements as compared to the cape.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2006
Posts: 529
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Mar 2007, 21:22
I agree for D.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 28
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 21 Mar 2007, 13:18
i think it's (C). (C) just says gold ear weights, with jasper ornaments. it says nothing about it being an artifact. all the other choices specify that the respective object was found in a place of archaelogical significance.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 77
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2007, 03:28
its D which also the OA. The choice is very easy to spot
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2006
Posts: 299
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2007, 05:17
"Ruins" tend to be buried and excavated. We can not assume that the artifact in B was not buried. Only D gives us this option
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2006
Posts: 215
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Mar 2007, 09:11
I too for D.

.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Why not E? [#permalink] New post 13 Jun 2007, 07:30
Guys,
Can you please explain why
(E) A multicolored woven sash found near the gravesite of a slave
cannot be the right answer?

Both the tests might not work with a sash even though it is multicolored.
Why not E?   [#permalink] 13 Jun 2007, 07:30
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian sumitsarkar82 8 18 Aug 2006, 03:40
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian gamjatang 4 07 Dec 2005, 07:13
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian cybera 3 14 Jul 2005, 14:08
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian MA 6 19 Apr 2005, 21:45
Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian Antmavel 5 24 Mar 2005, 18:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Determining the authenticity of purported pre-Columbian

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.