Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 May 2013, 21:01
Customize  |  Hide

Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 112
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 [#permalink] New post 08 May 2008, 20:28
00:00

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:51) wrong based on 1 sessions
A question from GMAT Prep I get wrong all the ways I did. Anybody knows how to do this


Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 miles along a certain trail ( i mile =1.6km rounded to nearest tenth)

1 Pei walked the distance at an average rate of less than 6.4 km/hr.

2 On average it took Pei more than 9 minutes per km to walk the distance .
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 86
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT PREP Question [#permalink] New post 08 May 2008, 20:56
neeraj.kaushal wrote:
A question from GMAT Prep I get wrong all the ways I did. Anybody knows how to do this


Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 miles along a certain trail ( i mile =1.6km rounded to nearest tenth)

1 Pei walked the distance at an average rate of less than 6.4 km/hr.

2 On average it took Pei more than 9 minutes per km to walk the distance .


Is the answer D?

1. At most, Pei walked 12.8km in 2 hours. Since the trail is 16km long, then we know that Pei took more than 2 hours. Therefore, statement 1 is sufficient

2. At the fastest, Pei walked 1 km in 9 minutes. Then to walk 16km, the Pei needs 144 minutes, which is more than 2 hours. Therefore, statement 2 is sufficient.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 112
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Re: GMAT PREP Question [#permalink] New post 11 May 2008, 15:36
Sorry guys for delay in releasing OA. Its D and thanks for explanation
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2007
Posts: 204
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: GMAT PREP Question [#permalink] New post 11 May 2008, 16:11
neeraj.kaushal wrote:
A question from GMAT Prep I get wrong all the ways I did. Anybody knows how to do this


Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 miles along a certain trail ( i mile =1.6km rounded to nearest tenth)

1 Pei walked the distance at an average rate of less than 6.4 km/hr.

2 On average it took Pei more than 9 minutes per km to walk the distance .


I say D.

first, conversions: 10 miles = 16 km

2 hours = 120 minutes

1) less than 6.4km/hr - you want to know if it took less than 2 hours. 6.4 x 2 = 12.8km in two hours, when she has to go 16. You can answer the question if it took more than 2 hours.

Sufficient, eliminate B, C, & E.

2) 9 minutes per km - you want to know if it took less than 2 hours. 16km x 9min = 144 minutes for 16 km, when 120 minutes = 2 hours. You can answer the question if it took longer than two hours.

Sufficient, eliminate A.

D.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: GMAT PREP Question [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2011, 06:24
guy with 1st statement:

here is my calculation:
if it takes 1 hour to walk max 6.4 km
if will take max. 2.5 hours to walk 16 km.

since it says average rate less than 6.4 so time is less than 2.5 but it could be less than 2.
so im getting that A is not suff. whats wrong with my method ?
pls explain
GMAT Club team member
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11522
Followers: 1795

Kudos [?]: 9549 [0], given: 826

Re: GMAT PREP Question [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2011, 08:10
tinki wrote:
guy with 1st statement:

here is my calculation:
if it takes 1 hour to walk max 6.4 km
if will take max. 2.5 hours to walk 16 km.

since it says average rate less than 6.4 so time is less than 2.5 but it could be less than 2.
so im getting that A is not suff. whats wrong with my method ?
pls explain


distance=rate*time --> rate and time are inversely proportional, which means that if you increase the rate then you'll need less time to cover the same distance and if you decrease the rate you'll need more time to cover the same distance.

So, rate is less than 6.4 kilometers per hour means that time needed to cover 16 kilometers is more than 2.5 hours.

Alternate approach:

Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 miles along a certain trail? (1mile = 1.6 Kilometers, rounded to the nearest tenth)

Basically the question asks whether the rate was less than 10/2=5 miles per hour: is rate<5 miles per hour? Because if it is less than 5 miles per hour, then time needed to cover 10 miles would be more than 2 hours.

(1) Pei walked this distance at an average rate of less than 6.4 kilometers per hour --> rate<6.4 kilometers per hour --> 6.4 kilometer = 6.4/1.6 = 4 miles --> rate<4 miles per hour. Sufficient.

(2) On average, it took Pei more than 9 minutes per Kilometers to walk this distance --> more than 9/60 hours to cover 1 kilometer --> rate<60/9 kilometers per hour (time more - rate less) --> 60/9 kilometers = (60/9)/1.6 = ~4.2 miles --> rate<4.2 miles per hour. Sufficient.

Answer: D.
_________________

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2010
Posts: 92
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 22

GMAT Tests User
Re: GMAT PREP Question [#permalink] New post 13 Feb 2011, 08:58
Bunuel wrote:
tinki wrote:
guy with 1st statement:

here is my calculation:
if it takes 1 hour to walk max 6.4 km
if will take max. 2.5 hours to walk 16 km.

since it says average rate less than 6.4 so time is less than 2.5 but it could be less than 2.
so im getting that A is not suff. whats wrong with my method ?
pls explain


distance=rate*time --> rate and time are inversely proportional, which means that if you increase the rate then you'll need less time to cover the same distance and if you decrease the rate you'll need more time to cover the same distance.

So, rate is less than 6.4 kilometers per hour means that time needed to cover 16 kilometers is more than 2.5 hours.

Alternate approach:

Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 miles along a certain trail? (1mile = 1.6 Kilometers, rounded to the nearest tenth)

Basically the question asks whether the rate was less than 10/2=5 miles per hour: is rate<5 miles per hour? Because if it is less than 5 miles per hour, then time needed to cover 10 miles would be more than 2 hours.

(1) Pei walked this distance at an average rate of less than 6.4 kilometers per hour --> rate<6.4 kilometers per hour --> 6.4 kilometer = 6.4/1.6 = 4 miles --> rate<4 miles per hour. Sufficient.

(2) On average, it took Pei more than 9 minutes per Kilometers to walk this distance --> more than 9/60 hours to cover 1 kilometer --> rate<60/9 kilometers per hour (time more - rate less) --> 60/9 kilometers = (60/9)/1.6 = ~4.2 miles --> rate<4.2 miles per hour. Sufficient.

Answer: D.

Thanks... got that
Re: GMAT PREP Question   [#permalink] 13 Feb 2011, 08:58
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts It takes Henry 2 more hours than Harrison to make 20 golf Titleist 2 13 Nov 2005, 17:40
New posts Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 uvs_mba 5 11 Nov 2006, 19:40
New posts EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 marcodonzelli 3 26 Dec 2007, 08:07
New posts 1 Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10 marcodonzelli 1 13 Jan 2008, 08:04
Popular new posts 8 EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC It takes Jack 2 more hours than Tom to type 20 pages. If Barkatis 17 07 Oct 2010, 10:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Did it take Pei more than 2 hours to walk a distance of 10

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.