Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Oct 2014, 08:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Dietary researcher: A recent study reports that laboratory

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Dietary researcher: A recent study reports that laboratory [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2007, 11:47
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Dietary researcher: A recent study reports that laboratory animals that were fed reduced-calorie diets lived longer than laboratory animals whose caloric intake was not reduced. In response, some doctors are advocating reduced-calorie diets, in the belief that North Americans’ life spans can thereby be extended. However, this conclusion is not supported. Laboratory animals tend to eat much more than animals in their natural habitats, which leads to their having a shorter life expectancy. Restricting their diets merely brings their caloric intake back to natural optimal levels and reinstates their normal life spans.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the dietary researcher’s argument?

(A) North Americans, on average, consume a higher number of calories than the optimal number of calories for a human diet.
(B) North Americans with high-fat, low-calorie diets generally have a shorter life expectancy than North Americans with low-fat, low-calorie diets.
(C) Not all scientific results that have important implications for human health are based on studies of laboratory animals.
(D) Some North Americans who follow reduced-calorie diets are long-lived.
(E) There is a strong correlation between diet and longevity in some species of animals.

Answers with explanations.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 449
Location: USA
Schools: Tepper '11
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2007, 12:13
my guess is A It indicates that the lab conditions closely mimic current human overeating conditions.

B argument had nothing to do with fat
C "not all" do could still mean many do
D "some" does not indicate any tendency
E the correlation is not described
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 1551
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 236 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2007, 12:54
I would say B. In option A, it is comparing animals' diets to those of humans. We are not trying to compare animals to humans. we are only comparing the life span of animals with a certain diet in 2 different settings that would weaken the claim in the argument. Option B addresses that. The animals that eat a lot, which is shown by the fact that they have high fat content, will not have a long life. This weakens the claim made in the last part of the argument. that last part says that animals that eat less will have a shorter life span, and option B contradicts that. is it B?

Last edited by tarek99 on 10 Dec 2007, 13:06, edited 3 times in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 214
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2007, 12:59
I pick C. B talks about high fat, which is irrelevant in this argument.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2007
Posts: 64
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2007, 13:37
My ANswer is B. Whats OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 449
Location: USA
Schools: Tepper '11
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2007, 14:31
The argument never mentions fat. It would be like saying "north americans with red sweaters and low calorie diets have longer life expectancy than those with brown sweaters and low calorie diets"

If the answer is B, I'm gonna sent Mr. GMAT an e-smack
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2007, 15:20
Tarmac wrote:
The argument never mentions fat. It would be like saying "north americans with red sweaters and low calorie diets have longer life expectancy than those with brown sweaters and low calorie diets"

If the answer is B, I'm gonna sent Mr. GMAT an e-smack


:-D
But even if the argument never mentions fat, as per (B), low calorie diets are probably not the only contributing factor to the life expectancy. Other than low calorie factor, the fat factor exists. So the argument can be weakened. Right? What say?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 449
Location: USA
Schools: Tepper '11
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2007, 16:40
am I missing something here?

The researcher's statement can be summarized as: "North Americans cannot increase their lifespan by simply reducing caloric intake, because reducing intake only helps those who have too much intake to begin with. The experiment with animals is not relevant to the greater population because it reflects this rare case where there is too much intake to begin with."

A. says "the experiment does apply to the larger population, because the larger population consumes too many calories, just like in the experiment"

anyway, I think it's time for the OA. what is it?
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 1102
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Diet [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2007, 10:27
eyunni wrote:
Dietary researcher: A recent study reports that laboratory animals that were fed reduced-calorie diets lived longer than laboratory animals whose caloric intake was not reduced. In response, some doctors are advocating reduced-calorie diets, in the belief that North Americans’ life spans can thereby be extended. However, this conclusion is not supported. Laboratory animals tend to eat much more than animals in their natural habitats, which leads to their having a shorter life expectancy. Restricting their diets merely brings their caloric intake back to natural optimal levels and reinstates their normal life spans.

Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the dietary researcher’s argument?

(A) North Americans, on average, consume a higher number of calories than the optimal number of calories for a human diet.
(B) North Americans with high-fat, low-calorie diets generally have a shorter life expectancy than North Americans with low-fat, low-calorie diets.
(C) Not all scientific results that have important implications for human health are based on studies of laboratory animals.
(D) Some North Americans who follow reduced-calorie diets are long-lived.
(E) There is a strong correlation between diet and longevity in some species of animals.

Answers with explanations.


consider this period.....Restricting their diets merely brings their caloric intake back to natural optimal levels and reinstates their normal life spans....it means that their diet has too much calories.....A follows the same reasoning therefore it seems the best answer....
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2007
Posts: 120
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2007, 11:23
A.

The researcher claims that the conclusion - a low cal diet would extend the life span of North Americans as it does for lab animals - stands weak because a low cal diet just brings the life span back to normal. the life span of lab animals is shortened by over eating.

The claim that the conclusion is weak would weaken if a similar case (of shortened life span due to over eating) holds true for North Americans. In that case the life span of NA would be extended by getting back to normal.

What is OA?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 649
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 30 Dec 2007, 13:33
OA is A.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2005
Posts: 99
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Diet [#permalink] New post 07 Jan 2008, 09:35
A it is... Good one...
Re: CR: Diet   [#permalink] 07 Jan 2008, 09:35
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Dietary researcher: A recent study reports that laboratory ohfred 13 11 May 2010, 08:47
A recent research study of undergraduate students analyzed malar 14 04 Feb 2009, 02:45
4 A recent research study of undergraduate students analyzed marshpa 7 28 Jul 2008, 11:25
A recent research study of undergraduate students analyzed bepositive 3 21 May 2008, 06:57
Education researchers recently concluded a study that seems nupurgupt 6 25 Jul 2007, 09:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Dietary researcher: A recent study reports that laboratory

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.