Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 24 May 2016, 14:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Difference in entry level positions

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 354
Location: Texas
Schools: Chicago (R2), Kellogg (R2), Tuck (R1), Darden (R1), Cornell (R1), Texas (R2), Rice (R1)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [1] , given: 0

Difference in entry level positions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Dec 2008, 20:46
1
This post received
KUDOS
Guys,

If an HBS grad and a Rice grad both get placed in the same company and the same office, do you think that the pay offered would significantly differ? For example, Merrill in their Houston office.

Thanks,
_________________

Traffic never sleeps...

Last edited by traffix on 13 Dec 2008, 01:15, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 1634
Location: Southern California
Schools: Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0

Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2008, 00:39
nadtrans wrote:
Guys,

If an HBS grad and a Rice grad both get placed in the same company and the same office, do you think that the pay offered would significantly differ? For example, if Merrill in their Houston office.

Thanks,

This is going to vary quite a bit by company.

For most investment banks - the one key variable you're missing is what division are they going to be in? Merrill may have an Investment Banking Division, Sales & Trading, and Private Wealth Management - all of whom they hire MBAs for. The compensation within the divisions will be the same, but it will be different across them. They may have the same base salaries even (historically 95K the past few years for most banks), but the year-end bonus will vary quite a bit. _________________ Check out the new Career Forum http://gmatclub.com/forum/133 Current Student Joined: 26 Nov 2008 Posts: 76 Schools: Chicago Booth, Class of 2011 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 3 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 18 Dec 2008, 15:37 I agree with agold. I know plenty of people at the top schools and at the lower tier schools. The large companies recruit from both, but they get placed into different jobs, with different career trajectories. The HBS grad would get placed on the high profile career trajectory path, whereas the Rice grad would have to work their tail off. In the end, though, the good thing is that people from either schools can get to the top, but it's the typical, HBS opens more doors, meaning you don't have to pass through as many to get to where you want to be. Manager Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Posts: 165 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 21 Dec 2008, 02:54 A lot of companies have "tiers" of schools as well when determining starting salary, especially for new recruits out of school. Senior Manager Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 354 Location: Texas Schools: Chicago (R2), Kellogg (R2), Tuck (R1), Darden (R1), Cornell (R1), Texas (R2), Rice (R1) Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 21 Dec 2008, 15:24 Do u have examples? k88 wrote: A lot of companies have "tiers" of schools as well when determining starting salary, especially for new recruits out of school. _________________ Traffic never sleeps... Manager Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Posts: 165 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 22 Dec 2008, 17:34 Tier 1: M7 schools Tier 2: Top 20/30 schools Tier 3: People who did part time while at work, other MBA programs outside of top 30, etc. Part time could be at a Top 10 school but since they are within the company the pay bump they get isn't very large compared to new recruits. Within there, there are distinct pay ranges. I will say that at a lot of large companies there are "fluke" schools in those Tiers-- maybe the CEO's wife went to some random MBA program and now he sits on their board- that school might get ranked higher than it should be simply because of his affiliation, etc. GMAT Club Legend Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 4318 Location: Back in Chicago, IL Schools: Kellogg Alum: Class of 2010 Followers: 89 Kudos [?]: 746 [0], given: 5 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 22 Dec 2008, 20:39 The biggest difference will be the positions people are hired into. A company may hire a top 5 MBA into one program while a top 30 could be hired by the same company but their function could be totally different...and may not be paid as well. _________________ Kellogg Class of 2010...still active and willing to help. However, I do not do profile reviews, don't offer predictions on chances and am far to busy to review essays, so save the energy of writing me a PM seeking help for these. If I don't respond to a PM that is not one of the previously mentioned trash can destined messages, please don't take it personally I get so many messages I have a hard to responding to most. The more interesting, compelling, or humorous you message the more likely I am to respond. GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings VP Joined: 28 Feb 2008 Posts: 1323 Schools: Tuck Followers: 6 Kudos [?]: 123 [0], given: 6 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 28 Dec 2008, 20:43 From what I know of health care, it's more of an issue if you can get a position in the first place. Companies recruit at some schools, but not at others (and it often has nothing to do with school ranking). Once you get in, where you graduated has zero impact on starting pay or promotions. RF _________________ Senior Manager Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 354 Location: Texas Schools: Chicago (R2), Kellogg (R2), Tuck (R1), Darden (R1), Cornell (R1), Texas (R2), Rice (R1) Followers: 2 Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 29 Dec 2008, 00:37 Thanks guys! _________________ Traffic never sleeps... SVP Joined: 11 Mar 2008 Posts: 1634 Location: Southern California Schools: Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD) Followers: 8 Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 30 Dec 2008, 18:50 Here's an interesting link for Fidelity: http://jobs.fidelity.com/findajob/stude ... lege.shtml "Fidelity Consulting Group" is their research/investments group, and they hire from HBS, Tuck, Kellogg and a handful of other schools. All of the other schools will feed into Fidelity, but those are back office support positions. _________________ Check out the new Career Forum http://gmatclub.com/forum/133 Current Student Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 283 Location: Milan Schools: Wharton, LBS, UChicago, Kellogg MMM (Donald Jacobs Scholarship), Stanford, HBS Followers: 7 Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 3 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Dec 2008, 03:38 I was checking the emplyoment report for M7 schools yesterday, and looking at the higher end of the compensation ranges it struck me that while the share of applicants that go into PE/VC is in fact quite similar among schools (around 10% for H/S/W, around 5% for others), the compensation is totally different: Stanford gets incredible highs (250K base salary, 200K guaranteed bonus, 100K sign-on), Harvard trails (160K base), all the ohers including Wharton report compensation aligned with the higher end of IB. Anyone has some rationale for this kind of placement in PE/VC? Agold? SVP Joined: 11 Mar 2008 Posts: 1634 Location: Southern California Schools: Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD) Followers: 8 Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Dec 2008, 08:47 Paradosso wrote: I was checking the emplyoment report for M7 schools yesterday, and looking at the higher end of the compensation ranges it struck me that while the share of applicants that go into PE/VC is in fact quite similar among schools (around 10% for H/S/W, around 5% for others), the compensation is totally different: Stanford gets incredible highs (250K base salary, 200K guaranteed bonus, 100K sign-on), Harvard trails (160K base), all the ohers including Wharton report compensation aligned with the higher end of IB. Anyone has some rationale for this kind of placement in PE/VC? Agold? My guess would be that Harvard and Stanford place more people into large-cap PE funds (KKR, Blackstone, Carlyle, TH Lee, and their peers), whereas Wharton/Chicago/Columbia/etc. tend to place more people into small-cap and mid-market PE funds where the assets under management, and therefore compensation is lower. Large cap PE is really dominated by H/S. One side factor to consider is that the large cap funds will work you to the bone. 70-100 hour weeks are common at places like KKR and Blackstone - you're basically working banker hours. If you go to a smaller fund, depending on what their culture is like, you could be working 50-60 hours/week and maintain a good work-life balance while still making "banker money". _________________ Check out the new Career Forum http://gmatclub.com/forum/133 Current Student Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 283 Location: Milan Schools: Wharton, LBS, UChicago, Kellogg MMM (Donald Jacobs Scholarship), Stanford, HBS Followers: 7 Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 3 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Dec 2008, 09:11 Thanks, yet looking at the Kellogg employment report for class of 2007 one can observe how 3 people went into Carlyle and their base salary was basically 150K (you can infer it combining the detailed graphs they provide). They also placed one at Blackstone. So I'm not sure, those two 250K Stanford hires are one in the West Coast and one in the North East, either it's KKR, Apax or TPG or it's some kind of outlier (a nice one though!). Happy new year to everyone! GMAT Club Legend Joined: 10 Apr 2007 Posts: 4318 Location: Back in Chicago, IL Schools: Kellogg Alum: Class of 2010 Followers: 89 Kudos [?]: 746 [0], given: 5 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Dec 2008, 09:28 agold wrote: Paradosso wrote: I was checking the emplyoment report for M7 schools yesterday, and looking at the higher end of the compensation ranges it struck me that while the share of applicants that go into PE/VC is in fact quite similar among schools (around 10% for H/S/W, around 5% for others), the compensation is totally different: Stanford gets incredible highs (250K base salary, 200K guaranteed bonus, 100K sign-on), Harvard trails (160K base), all the ohers including Wharton report compensation aligned with the higher end of IB. Anyone has some rationale for this kind of placement in PE/VC? Agold? My guess would be that Harvard and Stanford place more people into large-cap PE funds (KKR, Blackstone, Carlyle, TH Lee, and their peers), whereas Wharton/Chicago/Columbia/etc. tend to place more people into small-cap and mid-market PE funds where the assets under management, and therefore compensation is lower. Its pretty easy to explain...not only is it the companies they are going to but what they did before school. People outside of H/S do go to the big companies but wont be paid nearly as high as someone who worked for Bain Capital, Blackstone, or Carlyle before school and is returning to them. These people have the ultimate pedigree, they went to the best undergrads, had amazing grades that got them into the most desirable jobs coming out of undergrad. So its almost 100% sure bet they are going to H/S. So if you have that background and are going back to your company chances are you are going to be paid far better than the newbies getting hired into them. You see this with consultants...everyone newly hired in gets the same offer but people returning can make more (who do you think are the highly paid people in that part of the report). Basically if you were going to be one of those super highly paid people you probably would know it so dont worry about it. _________________ Kellogg Class of 2010...still active and willing to help. However, I do not do profile reviews, don't offer predictions on chances and am far to busy to review essays, so save the energy of writing me a PM seeking help for these. If I don't respond to a PM that is not one of the previously mentioned trash can destined messages, please don't take it personally I get so many messages I have a hard to responding to most. The more interesting, compelling, or humorous you message the more likely I am to respond. GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings Current Student Joined: 26 Nov 2008 Posts: 76 Schools: Chicago Booth, Class of 2011 Followers: 1 Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 3 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Dec 2008, 15:26 Agreed...it's where they're coming from. I know a few people at Bain Capital, one guy worked there before and after his MBA, another started working there after his MBA. The individual who was there prior to the MBA started as a higher level employee post MBA and his salary was something like 125K/year more (who knows about the bonus). You see this kind of thing going on at Wharton, in particular with IB and IM...there are a few people that have starting salaries pushing 300K just out of school. Last edited by fluidian on 31 Dec 2008, 23:57, edited 1 time in total. SVP Joined: 11 Mar 2008 Posts: 1634 Location: Southern California Schools: Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD) Followers: 8 Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0 Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Dec 2008, 16:04 Over the past few years (namely 2006 and 2007), Pre-MBA Associates at KKR were signing contracts to get1 in 2, or $1 million over the course of 2 years all-in, including bonuses. I would have to reasonably guess from this that a post-MBA vice president at KKR in 2006 or 2007 would have pulled in ~$750K in his first year. I doubt we'll see anything like this anytime soon - so keep reliving the glory days folks

By the way, this thread is getting way off-topic, lol.
_________________

Check out the new Career Forum
http://gmatclub.com/forum/133

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 322
Location: Texas
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 10

Re: Difference in entry level positions [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Jan 2009, 11:39
agold wrote:
Over the past few years (namely 2006 and 2007), Pre-MBA Associates at KKR were signing contracts to get $1 in 2, or$1 million over the course of 2 years all-in, including bonuses. I would have to reasonably guess from this that a post-MBA vice president at KKR in 2006 or 2007 would have pulled in ~ \$750K in his first year. I doubt we'll see anything like this anytime soon - so keep reliving the glory days folks

By the way, this thread is getting way off-topic, lol.

You are an endless pit of information! KUDOS.
I do not even know where you get this stuff.
Re: Difference in entry level positions   [#permalink] 01 Jan 2009, 11:39
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Entry level jobs in consulting 1 17 Mar 2012, 22:22
1 CFA Level 1 to makeup for average GPA? 5 17 Oct 2010, 00:29
Entry Level Currently (Only Way To Go Is UP!) 4 19 Aug 2010, 00:56
3 What are the good GM programs - with C/EVP level mentors? 25 05 Nov 2009, 10:28
Are these "mba' jobs entry level? 1 02 Feb 2009, 21:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Difference in entry level positions

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.