|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 328
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[1] , given: 0
|
Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are [#permalink]
12 Jul 2007, 10:03
1
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
17% (01:54) correct
82% (00:51) wrong based on 1 sessions
245. Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have given rise to substantial differentials between the wage of housepainters and secretaries and between the wages of parking-lot attendants and library assistants.
(A) paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have
(B) paid in occupations that are predominantly make over those that are predominantly female have
(C) that favors predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female have
(D) that favors predominantly male occupations over those that are predominantly female has
(E) paid in predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female has
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 237
Kudos [?]:
413
[5] , given: 11
|
5
This post received KUDOS
Hey All, Lots of conversation around this one, but it doesn't look like anyone's taken it apart piece by piece. Let's do that. This is a tough question, because it is masquerading as a comparison question. I saw a lot of people mention comparison here, and there absolutely is one. However, none of them really compare the way I (and probably you) would like to see it, "Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are predominantly male over those paid in occupations that are predominantly female..." Then we would get the comparison we want. But none of the answers do it, so comparison must not be the issue here. In reality, it's much simpler: this is a straight-forward subject-verb agreement question. The two important splits are paid/favors, and have/has at the end. Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have given rise to substantial differentials between the wage of housepainters and secretaries and between the wages of parking-lot attendants and library assistants. (A) paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have PROBLEM: The subject of "have" is "discrimination", which is singular, so we need "has". How do we know it's "discrimination", and not "wages" or "occupations"? Well, if you'd read the MGMAT Sentence Correction guide, you'd know! : ) The subject of a sentence will never be within a prepositional phrase. "in wages paid" is prepositional, as is "in occupations". This means "discrimination" is our subject, which is singular. (B) paid in occupations that are predominantly make over those that are predominantly female have PROBLEM: same as above. (C) that favors predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female have PROBLEM: Because "that" is a relative pronoun, we know that this phrase modifies "wages". This means "wages" must be the subject of "favors", so it should be "favor". (D) that favors predominantly male occupations over those that are predominantly female has PROBLEM: Same as above. (E) paid in predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female has ANSWER: Correct in all ways. That's a rough one. Hope that helps! -tommy
_________________
Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco
Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 237
Kudos [?]:
413
[1] , given: 11
|
1
This post received KUDOS
Hey kevskesav, In fact, that is the correct comparison. We're comparing occupations that are predominantly male to the predominantly female (occupations). They left out the noun, but that's because it's understood. As for Noboru's example, yes, your example is grammatically correct, because even though the relative clause isn't directly touching what it modifies, that's because we already have another modifier (and they can't both touch) "of high school graduates" which ITSELF is then modified by "in the United States". Hope that helps! -t
_________________
Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco
Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 237
Kudos [?]:
413
[1] , given: 11
|
1
This post received KUDOS
Hey Nusma, Well the sentence itself already says "predominantly male occupations", so it must be okay to imply that other occupations are predominantly female. It isn't that the word itself has a gender, it's just like saying "The boys soccer team". -t
_________________
Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco
Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 237
Kudos [?]:
413
[1] , given: 11
|
1
This post received KUDOS
Hey Munda, I don't quite understand your question. The "that" clause modifies the big noun "discrimination in wages." It's sort of like saying: "The Jack in the box that I got for Christmas is broken." "in the box" is technically modifying "Jack", but really it's just one big noun "The Jack In The Box". Also, the rule you're referencing is to deal with subject-verb agreement issues, not modifier issues. You get rid of middlemen to locate the subject and verb, not to figure out how the modifiers are working. You wouldn't want to get rid of middlemen to deal with modifiers, because middlemen ARE modifiers. -t
_________________
Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco
Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 480
Location: united states
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
sidbidus wrote: 245. Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have given rise to substantial differentials between the wage of housepainters and secretaries and between the wages of parking-lot attendants and library assistants.
(A) paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have (B) paid in occupations that are predominantly make over those that are predominantly female have (C) that favors predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female have (D) that favors predominantly male occupations over those that are predominantly female has (E) paid in predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female has
discripency in SVA leaves D and E.
E is the best answer.
_________________
for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 386
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
D here for me. Discrimination is singular. those is required as we are talking wages in occupations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 321
Location: Orange County, CA
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
11
[0], given: 0
|
My vote for D as well b/c of the reasons provided above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 749
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
8
[0], given: 0
|
Discrimination is singular. So, D and E.
I go with D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 127
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 0
|
go to with D. Due to SVA error and "paid in" does not sound good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 919
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
28
[0], given: 0
|
shoonya wrote: sidbidus wrote: 245. Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have given rise to substantial differentials between the wage of housepainters and secretaries and between the wages of parking-lot attendants and library assistants.
(A) paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have (B) paid in occupations that are predominantly make over those that are predominantly female have (C) that favors predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female have (D) that favors predominantly male occupations over those that are predominantly female has (E) paid in predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female has discripency in SVA leaves D and E. E is the best answer.
join E for subject verb agreement.
"discrimination" is a singular subject so it needs a singular verb "has". D is not clear about the female occupations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 0
|
D it is.
E incorrectly compares male occupations with predominantly females and not occupations with occupations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1635
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 25
Kudos [?]:
118
[0], given: 2
|
It´s strange. OA is E.
_________________
The sky is the limit 800 is the limit
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 03 Aug 2009
Posts: 84
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
23
[0], given: 1
|
sidbidus wrote: 245. Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have given rise to substantial differentials between the wage of housepainters and secretaries and between the wages of parking-lot attendants and library assistants.
(A) paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have (B) paid in occupations that are predominantly make over those that are predominantly female have (C) that favors predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female have (D) that favors predominantly male occupations over those that are predominantly female has (E) paid in predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female has "Discrimination in wages that favors" is wrong as it is not the Discrimination that favors. "E" is the correct answer.
_________________
Consider kudos for good post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
E is wrong comparison. B seems to be correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Also I think the subject here is "wages" and not "discrimination", so it needs a "have" and not "has".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 17 Dec 2009
Posts: 9
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Hi Tommy
Is it correct that "predominantly male occupations" is compared with the "predominantly female" and not of predominantly female occupation??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 251
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 16
|
 damn I missed connecting 'wages' to 'that favors'. If I had ruled this out, only E would be left. Thanks Tommy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1570
Followers: 12
Kudos [?]:
121
[0], given: 6
|
Hey Tommy, that was a very good explanation. However, I have question regarding the comparison done in option (E). Is the option (E) not comparing "predominantly male occupations" with "predominantly female" which does not seem right to me? And this comparison is correct in (D).
Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have given rise to substantial differentials between the wage of housepainters and secretaries and between the wages of parking-lot attendants and library assistants.
(A) paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have (B) paid in occupations that are predominantly make over those that are predominantly female have (C) that favors predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female have (D) that favors predominantly male occupations over those that are predominantly female has (E) paid in predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female has
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 354
Location: San Francisco
Followers: 237
Kudos [?]:
413
[0], given: 11
|
Hey All, So a few more questions about the notion of comparison. Perhaps I was a bit hasty to write off comparisons entirely here (though you can answer the question more directly as subject-verb agreement. Let's take a look at the comparisons. 245. Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have given rise to substantial differentials between the wage of housepainters and secretaries and between the wages of parking-lot attendants and library assistants. (A) paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have COMPARISON: We would want to compare "predominantly male occupations" to "the predominantly female". The fact that this sentence breaks up that first element into "occupations that are predominantly male" is pretty ugly. We would rather have two nouns, not a noun and a clause. (B) paid in occupations that are predominantly make over those that are predominantly female have COMPARISON: This is a nice comparison "occupations that are predominantly male", "those that are predominantly female". (C) that favors predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female have COMPARISON: This is okay, too. "predominantly male occupations" "the predominantly female ["occupations" understood]" (D) that favors predominantly male occupations over those that are predominantly female has COMPARISON: This gives us a noun and a clause again, just like A. (E) paid in predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female has COMPARISON: Looks good, just like C. Hope that helps! -tommy
_________________
Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco
Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|