distance (m03q28) : Retired Discussions [Locked] - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 16:48

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# distance (m03q28)

Author Message
Current Student
Joined: 07 Sep 2011
Posts: 74
GMAT 1: 660 Q41 V40
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Analyst (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2012, 06:04
I have a question.. aren't these two going TOWARDS each other? The answer is still the same regardless.. but I don't think it holds true all the time.

If they were going in the same direction, you would equate their distance equations (rate*time). But they're meeting up from opposite directions.. so they're closing into each other. here is how I would set up the equation..

The distance travelend by the 2 should equal 48.
Let t=Walt's time

4(t+2)+6t=48
4t+8+6t=48
10t=40
t=4

If the started at the same time (had the same time value), I would just subtrance one rate from the other and equate the distance to 0 (dimishing distanc ebetween them set at 0). But since they didn't, I couldn't do that.

Can someone tell me if my logic above is incorrect?

Last edited by chris558 on 03 Oct 2012, 07:20, edited 1 time in total.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36520
Followers: 7066

Kudos [?]: 92917 [0], given: 10528

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2012, 06:18
chris558 wrote:
I have a question.. aren't these two going in OPPOSITE directions? The answer is still the same regardless.. but I don't think it holds true all the time.

If they were going in the same direction, you would equate their distance equations (rate*time). But they're meeting up from opposite directions.. so they're going in opposite directions so here is how I would set up the equation..

The distance travelend by the 2 should equal 48.
Let t=Walt's time

4(t+2)+6t=48
4t+8+6t=48
10t=40
t=4

If the started at the same time (had the same time value), I would just subtrance one rate from the other and equate the distance to 0 (dimishing distanc ebetween them set at 0). But since they didn't, I couldn't do that.

Can someone tell me if my logic above is incorrect?

The question states that "Lionel left his house and walked towards Walt's house ... Walt left his house and ran towards Lionel's house", so they are moving towards each other.

Check the solution here: distance-m03q28-59171.html#p1127472

Hope it helps.
_________________
Director
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 563
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 278 [0], given: 75

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2012, 06:31
@chris, in GMAT the language is factor which makes the quants more interesting , never miss any single point.

Also,We should recheck the answer using a little non-mechanical calculation as described by Bunuel . In GMAT one should always know more than one method to solve any quants question.
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Current Student
Joined: 07 Sep 2011
Posts: 74
GMAT 1: 660 Q41 V40
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
WE: Analyst (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2012, 07:23
Bunuel wrote:
The question states that "Lionel left his house and walked towards Walt's house ... Walt left his house and ran towards Lionel's house", so they are moving towards each other.

Check the solution here: distance-m03q28-59171.html#p1127472

Hope it helps.

Whoops- that's what I meant (I edited my post). A lot of people solved this by setting up the two rate equations to equal one another which gave the right answer, but only in this case. That should be done only if they were moving in the same direction. Because they're closing in on one another, I would've just solved it the way I previously explained (or the way you did in your other post).
Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2013
Posts: 2
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2013, 05:03
I think I may have done this wrong but got the correct answer.
Lionel initially starts at 2*4=8 so
Lionel's distance is 8+4t
Walt's distance is 6t
I set them equal to each other to see when they met. 8+4t=6t; so 8=2t and t=4
I plug 4 back to Lionel's distance equation 8+4(4)=24 so answer D

I never used the 48 miles given in the question like other people, is my method wrong?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 36520
Followers: 7066

Kudos [?]: 92917 [0], given: 10528

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2013, 07:47
wgtaylor wrote:
I think I may have done this wrong but got the correct answer.
Lionel initially starts at 2*4=8 so
Lionel's distance is 8+4t
Walt's distance is 6t
I set them equal to each other to see when they met. 8+4t=6t; so 8=2t and t=4
I plug 4 back to Lionel's distance equation 8+4(4)=24 so answer D

I never used the 48 miles given in the question like other people, is my method wrong?

Yes, it is wrong.

We don't know whether they meet at halfway of 48-mile distance, thus you cannot equate 8+4t and 6t.

Check for a solution here: distance-m03q28-59171.html#p1127472
_________________
Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 59
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 35

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2013, 05:20
Lionel walks 8 miles before Walt starts walking (2hrs @ 4mph)
Together they have to "manage" 40 mile distance. While we could use combined rate to figure the time both spent, it is not necessary (though it would be 4 hours). Since the rates of the speeds are in the ratio of 2:3, Lionel walks 40% of the distance (and Walt 60%), or 40miles*40%=16 miles.

16+8 = 24 --> total miles Lioned walked.
_________________

There are times when I do not mind kudos...I do enjoy giving some for help

Re: distance (m03q28)   [#permalink] 03 Oct 2013, 05:20

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 27 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
32 What is the least possible distance between a point on the 41 20 Nov 2008, 07:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# distance (m03q28)

Moderator: Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.