Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 08:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Does not this sentence require contrast? Chocolate had been

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Back to (GMAT) Times Square!!!
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Posts: 189
Location: United States (IL)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 25

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Does not this sentence require contrast? Chocolate had been [#permalink] New post 14 Dec 2011, 07:51
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

56% (01:42) correct 44% (00:56) wrong based on 16 sessions
Does not this sentence require contrast?

Chocolate had been once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings and now a cocoa shortage
may make chocolate
an exclusive luxury again.
A. had been once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings and now a cocoa shortage
may make chocolate
B. was once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings but now a cocoa shortage may
make chocolate
C. had once been the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings and now a cocoa shortage
will make chocolate
D. was once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings and now a cocoa
shortage may make chocolate
E. was once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings although now a cocoa shortage
may make chocolate

I chose B...not OA.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Working towards a goal...
V.

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 818
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
Schools: Ross '17, Duke '16
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 218 [0], given: 43

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: SC Grail Q64 [#permalink] New post 14 Dec 2011, 08:40
vix wrote:
Does not this sentence require contrast?

Chocolate had been once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings and now a cocoa shortage
may make chocolate
an exclusive luxury again.
A. had been once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings and now a cocoa shortage
may make chocolate
B. was once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings but now a cocoa shortage may
make chocolate
C. had once been the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings and now a cocoa shortage
will make chocolate
D. was once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings and now a cocoa
shortage may make chocolate
E. was once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings although now a cocoa shortage
may make chocolate

I chose B...not OA.


This is poor question although choice D is the best choice shows the full meaning of the sentence. After any conjunction in FANBOYS, we have to put the comma preceded it.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 276
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 21 [2] , given: 110

Re: SC Grail Q64 [#permalink] New post 14 Dec 2011, 11:07
2
This post received
KUDOS
Quote:
Does not this sentence require contrast?

No a contrast is not required here.
The purpose of the sentence is to inform the reader that chocolate was once a luxury and it may be a luxury again. A contrast would have been appropriate had the sentence mentioned that chocolate was once a luxury but is no more so. Hence, contrasting ideas are not mentioned in the sentence. In fact, the sentence is just two separate sentences joined by the conjunction 'and'.

Two separate events in the past, one happening before the other, are not discussed in the sentence. That is why past perfect tense is not required. Simple past tense would do. Thus, "had been" in options A and C is wrong.
Because a contrast is not required here, option B is also wrong. Option E also uses the word 'although' which introduces a contrasting scenario, which is not the case here. Thus E is wrong.

Option D correctly uses the Simple Past tense 'was' to state the past about chocolate. It also uses the conjunction 'and' to join the first part of the sentence with the second part, which states that the cocoa shortage may make chocolate a luxury item again. Thus, chocolate is back to its "luxurious" status again and thus, there is no contrast.

Hope this helps.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Back to (GMAT) Times Square!!!
Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Posts: 189
Location: United States (IL)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 25

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
Re: SC Grail Q64 [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2011, 02:31
Thanks guys, methinks I got the point!
_________________

Working towards a goal...
V.

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: GMAT Learner
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 652
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 231 [0], given: 32

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC Grail Q64 [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2011, 06:18
siddharthmuzumdar wrote:
Quote:
Does not this sentence require contrast?

No a contrast is not required here.
The purpose of the sentence is to inform the reader that chocolate was once a luxury and it may be a luxury again. A contrast would have been appropriate had the sentence mentioned that chocolate was once a luxury but is no more so. Hence, contrasting ideas are not mentioned in the sentence. In fact, the sentence is just two separate sentences joined by the conjunction 'and'.

Two separate events in the past, one happening before the other, are not discussed in the sentence. That is why past perfect tense is not required. Simple past tense would do. Thus, "had been" in options A and C is wrong.
Because a contrast is not required here, option B is also wrong. Option E also uses the word 'although' which introduces a contrasting scenario, which is not the case here. Thus E is wrong.

Option D correctly uses the Simple Past tense 'was' to state the past about chocolate. It also uses the conjunction 'and' to join the first part of the sentence with the second part, which states that the cocoa shortage may make chocolate a luxury item again. Thus, chocolate is back to its "luxurious" status again and thus, there is no contrast.

Hope this helps.


Thanks.
_________________

I am student of everyone-baten
Collections:-
PSof OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ps-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110005.html
DS of OG solved by GC members: http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-ds-with-solution-from-gmatclub-110004.html
100 GMAT PREP Quantitative collection http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-problem-collections-114358.html
Collections of work/rate problems with solutions http://gmatclub.com/forum/collections-of-work-rate-problem-with-solutions-118919.html
Mixture problems in a file with best solutions: http://gmatclub.com/forum/mixture-problems-with-best-and-easy-solutions-all-together-124644.html

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 735
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 264

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: SC Grail Q64 [#permalink] New post 15 Dec 2011, 21:18
+1 d
i agree with tuanquang269 regarding the correctness of the sentence.
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 276
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 110

Re: SC Grail Q64 [#permalink] New post 19 Dec 2011, 02:08
Baten80 wrote:
siddharthmuzumdar wrote:
Quote:
Does not this sentence require contrast?

No a contrast is not required here.
The purpose of the sentence is to inform the reader that chocolate was once a luxury and it may be a luxury again. A contrast would have been appropriate had the sentence mentioned that chocolate was once a luxury but is no more so. Hence, contrasting ideas are not mentioned in the sentence. In fact, the sentence is just two separate sentences joined by the conjunction 'and'.

Two separate events in the past, one happening before the other, are not discussed in the sentence. That is why past perfect tense is not required. Simple past tense would do. Thus, "had been" in options A and C is wrong.
Because a contrast is not required here, option B is also wrong. Option E also uses the word 'although' which introduces a contrasting scenario, which is not the case here. Thus E is wrong.

Option D correctly uses the Simple Past tense 'was' to state the past about chocolate. It also uses the conjunction 'and' to join the first part of the sentence with the second part, which states that the cocoa shortage may make chocolate a luxury item again. Thus, chocolate is back to its "luxurious" status again and thus, there is no contrast.

Hope this helps.


Thanks.

You're welcome. Glad it helped.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it

Re: SC Grail Q64   [#permalink] 19 Dec 2011, 02:08
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Chocolate had been once the drink of Mayan and Aztec kings getgyan 3 07 Oct 2012, 22:07
Experts publish their posts in the topic Had been usage in Kaplan aagar2003 1 22 Sep 2009, 22:37
1 Contrast amitdgr 2 09 Oct 2008, 07:41
Does this sentence sound weird? batchgmat 14 05 Jan 2007, 12:31
had been ankitraheja 0 11 Sep 2005, 05:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Does not this sentence require contrast? Chocolate had been

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.