Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 04 May 2015, 08:47

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Does the integer K have a factor p such that 1 < p

Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 797
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

Does the integer K have a factor p such that 1 < p [#permalink]  24 Dec 2007, 16:16
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions
Does the integer K have a factor p such that 1 < p <k>= 4!

2. 13! + 2 <= k <= 13! + 13

Can someone explain the official answer? it is included in the picture.

I don't see how K necessary could have a factor of p according to statement 2.

13! = 6227020800

Lets say K = 13! + 4 = 6227020804

and p = 6227020803

p is not a factor of k
Attachments

factorial.JPG [ 109.36 KiB | Viewed 2559 times ]

Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 865
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 218 [3] , given: 0

3
KUDOS
Rephrase the question: Does the integer K have a factor p such that 1 < p <k>4!

this tells us that K is greater than 4*3*2*1 or K>24

there are plenty of prime numbers and non-prime numbers that are greater than 24.

INSUFFICIENT

2. 13! + 2 <= k <= 13! + 13

this tells us that K is NOT a prime number. We know this because each of the numbers being added in there is a factor of 13!

Example:

13*12*11*10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1 + 2 is not prime because 2 is a factor
13*12*11*10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1 + 5 is not prime because 5 is a factor
13*12*11*10*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1 + 13 is not prime because 13 is a factor

Here's the rule to remember:

for any number that has factor X, that number + X is still divisible by X

like 99 is divisible by 11 so 99+11 must be divisible by 11 as well. It's the same concept tested with huge numbers

13! is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5...13 so 13! + 2, 3, 4, 5...13 must be divisible by any number between 2 and 13.

because of this Statement 2 tells us that K is NOT a prime number, answering the original question does K have a factor P between 1 and K. The answer is YES
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2591
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 234 [0], given: 0

Re: DS from GMATPREP: Does the integer K have a factor p [#permalink]  25 Dec 2007, 23:43
gmatnub wrote:
Does the integer K have a factor p such that 1 < p <k>= 4!

2. 13! + 2 <= k <= 13! + 13

Can someone explain the official answer? it is included in the picture.

I don't see how K necessary could have a factor of p according to statement 2.

13! = 6227020800

Lets say K = 13! + 4 = 6227020804

and p = 6227020803

p is not a factor of k

bah fell for the 1 trap. forgot k could be prime.
Re: DS from GMATPREP: Does the integer K have a factor p   [#permalink] 25 Dec 2007, 23:43
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1 < p < 7 04 Oct 2009, 10:13
Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1 < p < 3 26 Mar 2008, 00:09
Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k? 1. 2 24 Apr 2006, 07:40
Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1 < p < 2 22 Dec 2005, 17:32
Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1 < p < 3 07 Oct 2005, 04:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by