Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 May 2013, 20:48
Customize  |  Hide

Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 May 2010
Posts: 116
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [1] , given: 7

Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k? [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2010, 03:49
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00

Question Stats:

65% (02:12) correct 34% (01:13) wrong based on 3 sessions
i dont have any idea to solve the attached problem. Please provide methodology to solve such problems.

Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?

(1) k > 4!
(2) 13! + 2<= k <= 13!+13
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
4 KUDOS received
GMAT Club team member
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11594
Followers: 1799

Kudos [?]: 9585 [4] , given: 826

Re: gmat prep ds [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2010, 04:51
4
This post received
KUDOS
Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?

Question basically asks whether k is a prime number. If it is, then it won't have a factor p such that 1<p<k (definition of a prime number).

(1) k>4! --> k is more than some number (4!=24). k may or may not be a prime. Not sufficient.

(2) 13!+2\leq{k}\leq{13!+13} --> k can not be a prime. For instance if k=13!+8=8*(2*4*5*6*7*9*10*11*12*13+1), then k is a multiple of 8, so not a prime. Same for all other numbers in this range. So, k=13!+x, where 2\leq{x}\leq{13} will definitely be a multiple of x (as we would be able to factor out x out of 13!+x, the same way as we did for 8). Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Check similar question: factor-factorials-100670.html

Hope it's clear.
_________________

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 May 2010
Posts: 116
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 7

Re: gmat prep ds [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2010, 05:46
Thanks..can not be clearer than this.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1756
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 50

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 108

GMAT Tests User
Re: gmat prep ds [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2010, 15:20
Bunuel wrote:
Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?

Question basically asks is k a prime number. If it is, then it won't have a factor p such that 1<p<k (definition of a prime number).

(1) k>4! --> k is more than some number (4!=24). k may or may not be a prime. Not sufficient.

(2) 13!+2\leq{k}\leq{13!+13} --> k can not be a prime. For instance if k=13!+8=8*(2*4*5*6*7*9*10*11*12*13+1), then k is a multiple of 8, so not a prime. Same for all other numbers in this range. So, k=13!+x, where 2\leq{x}\leq{13} will definitely be a multiple of x (as we would be able to factor out x out of 13!+x). Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Check similar question: factor-factorials-100670.html

Hope it's clear.


Thanks Bunuel. I have a question, what would happen if the second statement said this?

(2) 13!+1\leq{k}\leq{13!+13}

I have seen some similar problems, in which they add 1. Could you post some links about it?

Thanks!
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

2 KUDOS received
GMAT Club team member
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11594
Followers: 1799

Kudos [?]: 9585 [2] , given: 826

Re: gmat prep ds [#permalink] New post 03 Nov 2010, 15:51
2
This post received
KUDOS
metallicafan wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?

Question basically asks is k a prime number. If it is, then it won't have a factor p such that 1<p<k (definition of a prime number).

(1) k>4! --> k is more than some number (4!=24). k may or may not be a prime. Not sufficient.

(2) 13!+2\leq{k}\leq{13!+13} --> k can not be a prime. For instance if k=13!+8=8*(2*4*5*6*7*9*10*11*12*13+1), then k is a multiple of 8, so not a prime. Same for all other numbers in this range. So, k=13!+x, where 2\leq{x}\leq{13} will definitely be a multiple of x (as we would be able to factor out x out of 13!+x). Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Check similar question: factor-factorials-100670.html

Hope it's clear.


Thanks Bunuel. I have a question, what would happen if the second statement said this?

(2) 13!+1\leq{k}\leq{13!+13}

I have seen some similar problems, in which they add 1. Could you post some links about it?

Thanks!


So basically we should determine whether 13!+1 is a prime number (as shown above all other possible values of k are not are not prime), which can not be done without a computer. There are some particular values of k=n!+1 for which we can say whether it's a prime or not with help of Wilson's theorem, but again it's out of the scope of GMAT.

By the way: 13!+1 is not a prime number, it has two distinct prime factors: 13!+1=83*75,024,347=6,227,020,801, so the answer still will be B.
_________________

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Nov 2010
Posts: 23
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: gmat prep ds [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2011, 18:04
Bunuel wrote:
Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?

Question basically asks whether k is a prime number. If it is, then it won't have a factor p such that 1<p<k (definition of a prime number).

(1) k>4! --> k is more than some number (4!=24). k may or may not be a prime. Not sufficient.

(2) 13!+2\leq{k}\leq{13!+13} --> k can not be a prime. For instance if k=13!+8=8*(2*4*5*6*7*9*10*11*12*13+1), then k is a multiple of 8, so not a prime. Same for all other numbers in this range. So, k=13!+x, where 2\leq{x}\leq{13} will definitely be a multiple of x (as we would be able to factor out x out of 13!+x). Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Check similar question: factor-factorials-100670.html

Hope it's clear.


Sorry for the question, but I am just not understanding how you get 8*(2*4*5*6*7*9*10*11*12*13+1) from 13!+8 then how do you know that k is a multiple of 8...I obviously have some deficiencies when it comes to number properties. So then how is k never a prime between those parameters?
I would think (1*2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10*11*12*13) +8 ...
1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club team member
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11594
Followers: 1799

Kudos [?]: 9585 [1] , given: 826

Re: gmat prep ds [#permalink] New post 10 Feb 2011, 18:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
ChenggongMAS wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?

Question basically asks whether k is a prime number. If it is, then it won't have a factor p such that 1<p<k (definition of a prime number).

(1) k>4! --> k is more than some number (4!=24). k may or may not be a prime. Not sufficient.

(2) 13!+2\leq{k}\leq{13!+13} --> k can not be a prime. For instance if k=13!+8=8*(2*4*5*6*7*9*10*11*12*13+1), then k is a multiple of 8, so not a prime. Same for all other numbers in this range. So, k=13!+x, where 2\leq{x}\leq{13} will definitely be a multiple of x (as we would be able to factor out x out of 13!+x). Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Check similar question: factor-factorials-100670.html

Hope it's clear.


Sorry for the question, but I am just not understanding how you get 8*(2*4*5*6*7*9*10*11*12*13+1) from 13!+8 then how do you know that k is a multiple of 8...I obviously have some deficiencies when it comes to number properties. So then how is k never a prime between those parameters?
I would think (1*2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10*11*12*13) +8 ...


k=13!+8 means k=2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10*11*12*13+8, now factor out 8: k=8*(2*4*5*6*7*9*10*11*12*13+1) --> k is a multiple of 8 as k=8*something --> as k is a multiple of 8 it can not be a prime number. You can have any number from 2 to 13 inclusive instead of 8, and you'll be able to factor out this number the same way as you did with 8, so any number of a type 13!+x, wher x is from 2 to 13 inclusive will be a multiple of x, thus not a prime number.

Check the link in my first post for similar problem. Also check Number Theory chapter of Math Book: math-number-theory-88376.html

Hope it's clear.
_________________

PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 11 Rules for Posting!!!

RESOURCES: [GMAT MATH BOOK]; 1. Triangles; 2. Polygons; 3. Coordinate Geometry; 4. Factorials; 5. Circles; 6. Number Theory

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. NEW!!!

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS ; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set. NEW!!!


What are GMAT Club Tests?
25 extra-hard Quant Tests

Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates

Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 160
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

GMAT Tests User
OG 11 [#permalink] New post 10 Dec 2011, 17:57
153. Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1>p>k?
(1) k>4!
(2) 13! + 2 <= k <= 13! + 13
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Posts: 113
Location: United States
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: OG 11 [#permalink] New post 13 Dec 2011, 15:37
Answer can't be E, it has to be B. I don't have OG with me, but I need to check.

1. By itself not sufficient. K could be prime.
2. 13! + 2 <= K <= 13! + 13 ensures that you have ever number from 2 - 13 dividing k.
That is:
13! + 2 -> div by 2
13! + 3 -> div by 3
... so on till 13.

So, answer should be B.
_________________

I am the master of my fate. I am the captain of my soul.
Please consider giving +1 Kudos if deserved!

DS - If negative answer only, still sufficient. No need to find exact solution.
PS - Always look at the answers first
CR - Read the question stem first, hunt for conclusion
SC - Meaning first, Grammar second
RC - Mentally connect paragraphs as you proceed. Short = 2min, Long = 3-4 min

GMAT Club team member
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 11594
Followers: 1799

Kudos [?]: 9585 [0], given: 826

Re: OG 11 [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2012, 08:30
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 468
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 11

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k? [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2013, 03:40
gmatcracker2010 wrote:
i dont have any idea to solve the attached problem. Please provide methodology to solve such problems.

Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?

(1) k > 4!
(2) 13! + 2<= k <= 13!+13


1.
if k=29 p=29= k NO!
if k =35 p could be 7 or 5 YES!
INSUFFICIENT!

2.
13! + 2 = 2(13!/2 + 1) = 2*odd
13! + 3 = 3(13!/3 + 1) = 3*odd
...
13! + 13 = 13 (12! +1) = 13*odd
Always there is a 1< p < 13! + n

Answer: B
Re: Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?   [#permalink] 22 Jan 2013, 03:40
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1 < p < étudiant 3 07 Oct 2005, 05:48
New posts Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1 < p < JAI HIND 2 22 Dec 2005, 18:32
New posts 2 Does the integer K have a factor p such that 1 < p gmatnub 2 24 Dec 2007, 17:16
New posts Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1 < p < japped187 3 26 Mar 2008, 01:09
New posts 1 Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1 < p < Navigator 7 04 Oct 2009, 11:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Does the integer k have a factor p such that 1<p<k?

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.