|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 201
Schools: Stanford...Wait, I will come!!!
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
17
[0], given: 3
|
Domestic automobile manufacturers have invested millions of [#permalink]
01 Dec 2008, 01:41
250. Domestic automobile manufacturers have invested millions of dollars into research to develop cars more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road. (A) into research to develop cars more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road (B) into research for developing even more gasoline-efficient cars on the road than at present (C) for research for cars to be developed that are more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road (D) in research to develop cars even more gasoline-efficient than those at present on the road (E) in research for developing cars that are even more gasoline-efficient than presently on the road
Which one is better out of D &E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 20 Sep 2008
Posts: 45
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Re: in research to develop [#permalink]
01 Dec 2008, 02:45
lgon wrote: 250. Domestic automobile manufacturers have invested millions of dollars into research to develop cars more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road. (A) into research to develop cars more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road (B) into research for developing even more gasoline-efficient cars on the road than at present (C) for research for cars to be developed that are more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road (D) in research to develop cars even more gasoline-efficient than those at present on the road (E) in research for developing cars that are even more gasoline-efficient than presently on the road
Which one is better out of D &E I would go for (D) as it is more concise, those refer to cars... and usually it's better to say research to develop cars instead of research for developing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 842
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
19
[0], given: 0
|
Re: in research to develop [#permalink]
02 Dec 2008, 16:32
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 563
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
21
[0], given: 2
|
Re: in research to develop [#permalink]
02 Dec 2008, 17:15
I will go with D....agree with jugolo1, what is the OA for this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2008
Posts: 69
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
15
[0], given: 0
|
Re: in research to develop [#permalink]
03 Dec 2008, 14:19
lgon wrote: 250. Domestic automobile manufacturers have invested millions of dollars into research to develop cars more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road. (A) into research to develop cars more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road (B) into research for developing even more gasoline-efficient cars on the road than at present (C) for research for cars to be developed that are more gasoline-efficient even than presently on the road (D) in research to develop cars even more gasoline-efficient than those at present on the road (E) in research for developing cars that are even more gasoline-efficient than presently on the road
Which one is better out of D &E More X than Y is the correct idiomatic usage
X and Y must be grammatically and logically parallel
X=cars even more gasoline effecient
Lets see Y in options D and E
D
Y= Those ( Demonstrative pronoun used to refer the copy and not the actual antecedent..meaning the cars to be developed and card currently running on the road are different)= cars currently on the road
Comparison grammatical: Yes ( Cars-plural, those -plural)
Comparison logical: Yes ( Apples to Apples)
Hurray!!
Comparison is logical, grammitcally correct and meaningful
But lets not finish..Lets try E
X=cars even more gasoline effecient
Y= there is no mention about cars or even pronouns
Illogical comparison !
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 775
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
32
[0], given: 99
|
Re: in research to develop [#permalink]
04 Dec 2008, 08:52
one more D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: in research to develop
[#permalink]
04 Dec 2008, 08:52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn
|