Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitors, now routinely used in : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Jan 2017, 03:52

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitors, now routinely used in

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 555
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 355 [0], given: 2

Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitors, now routinely used in [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2008, 11:40
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitors, now routinely used in hospital delivery rooms to check fetal heartbeat, are more intrusive than ordinary stethoscopes and do no more to improve the chances that a healthy baby will be born. Therefore, the additional cost of electronic monitoring is unjustified and such monitoring should be discontinued.
Dr. Anders: I disagree. Although you and I know that both methods are capable of providing the same information, electronic monitoring has been well worth the cost. Doctors now know the warning signs they need to listen for with stethoscopes, but only because of what was learned from using electronic monitors.
As a reply to Dr. Kim’s argument, Dr. Anders’ response is inadequate because it
(A) misses the point at issue
(B) assumes what it sets out to prove
(C) confuses high cost with high quality
(D) overestimates the importance of technology to modem medicine
(E) overlooks the fact that a procedure can be extensively used without being the best procedure available
A? C? Why?
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Current Student
Joined: 27 Mar 2008
Posts: 416
Schools: Kellogg Class of 2011
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 1

Re: CR-Electronic Monitor 2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2008, 12:09
(A) misses the point at issue
(B) assumes what it sets out to prove
(C) confuses high cost with high quality
(D) overestimates the importance of technology to modem medicine
(E) overlooks the fact that a procedure can be extensively used without being the best procedure available

Dr. Kim says that EFM and stethoscopes provide the same information which is why EFMs are not needed. Dr Anders just states that EFMs were good to find information not previously available. Now that the results from EFM are available and can be used to check any warning signs, Dr Anders arguement against discontinuing EFMs does not hold.
CEO
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2989
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 582 [0], given: 210

Re: CR-Electronic Monitor 2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2008, 16:57
Easily A, Dr. Kim is trying to prove that fetal monitors "has been well worth the cost" , but the point is whether it worth the cost in the FUTURE.

saravalli wrote:
Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitors, now routinely used in hospital delivery rooms to check fetal heartbeat, are more intrusive than ordinary stethoscopes and do no more to improve the chances that a healthy baby will be born. Therefore, the additional cost of electronic monitoring is unjustified and such monitoring should be discontinued.
Dr. Anders: I disagree. Although you and I know that both methods are capable of providing the same information, electronic monitoring has been well worth the cost. Doctors now know the warning signs they need to listen for with stethoscopes, but only because of what was learned from using electronic monitors.
As a reply to Dr. Kim’s argument, Dr. Anders’ response is inadequate because it
(A) misses the point at issue
(B) assumes what it sets out to prove
(C) confuses high cost with high quality
(D) overestimates the importance of technology to modem medicine
(E) overlooks the fact that a procedure can be extensively used without being the best procedure available
A? C? Why?
SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1575
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 2

Re: CR-Electronic Monitor 2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Apr 2008, 17:45
said A as well. first doctor is talking about cost of technique, second doctor says that it has given some useful info, but doesnt address why the cost still needs to be incurred.
Director
Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 555
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 355 [0], given: 2

Re: CR-Electronic Monitor 2 [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Apr 2008, 08:59
OA is A. Thanks
Re: CR-Electronic Monitor 2   [#permalink] 18 Apr 2008, 08:59
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Since the routine use of antibiotics can give rise to 7 30 Nov 2010, 16:52
Since the routine use of antibiotics can give rise to 1 15 Nov 2010, 21:59
7 Since the routine use of antibiotics can give rise to 17 22 Sep 2009, 10:49
Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitors, now routinely used in 3 17 Apr 2008, 11:37
Since the routine use of antibiotics can give rise to 7 25 Dec 2007, 03:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Dr. Kim: Electronic fetal monitors, now routinely used in

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.