Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 07 Dec 2016, 10:57

Help Desk is Open: Join Chat Room1 to Discuss your Queries with MBA Expert |  Join Chat Room2 for Chicago-Booth Decision Updates

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 554
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 409 [0], given: 2

Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Feb 2010, 15:30
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies. each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign
substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at

I know the OA for this question. However, I have a question that if I have a option such as

seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all targeted specifically at

then which option is correct? E or whatever new option, which I have mentioned above
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 20

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2010, 03:06
However, I have a question that if I have a option such as

seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all targeted specifically at

then which option is correct? E or whatever new option, which I have mentioned above

IMO, it still would be E because "...targeted at an invading microbe or foreign
substance.
Here we have singular noun "a microbe" at which each antibody is targeted.
Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Posts: 193
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2010, 06:41
I know the OA for this question. However, I have a question that if I have a option such as

seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all targeted specifically at

then which option is correct? E or whatever new option, which I have mentioned above

b/n each specifically targeted at and all specifically targeted at -- each .. sounds more correct.
Director
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 546
WE 1: Investment Banking - 6yrs
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 60 [1] , given: 92

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2010, 07:26
1
KUDOS
each - used to emphasize separateness
all - used to emphasize togetherness

Each of you contributed to my understanding of GMAT: shows that individually, I've learnt something from each one of you.
All of you contributed to my understanding of GMAT: shows that you'll have helped me understand GMAT - it's more general.

Also, in the question "target at" is the correct idiom.

Hope this helps.
Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2010
Posts: 62
Location: Tokyo
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2010, 20:05
i went for E and only looked at "to target at" as a correct variant
Intern
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 41
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 1

### Show Tags

23 Feb 2010, 20:22
A, B & C are eliminated because the underlined section has to start with seemingly

Since it is against an invading microbe, it has to be each targeted specifically at...answers your extra options too...

Senior Manager
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 320
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 35

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2010, 07:24
I chose E.
reasoning behind - similarly is the right adverb.....and targeted at is the right verb.
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 201
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 88 [0], given: 12

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2010, 09:13
IMO it is E.

"Seemingly" is the correct one so the choice is D or E.
"targeted at" leaves only one choice.
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 221
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 72 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

27 Feb 2010, 11:19
IMO E - due to similar reasons as mentioned above

Wats the OA ?
_________________

I do not suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 554
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 409 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2010, 21:58
OA is E
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 May 2009
Posts: 318
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2010, 10:25
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the body can constantly change its genes to fashion a seeming unlimited number of antibodies. each specifically targeted at an invading microbe or foreign
substance.

(A) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each specifically targeted at
(B) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically to
(C) seeming unlimited number of antibodies, all specifically targeted at
(D) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all of them targeted specifically to
(E) seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, each targeted specifically at

I know the OA for this question. However, I have a question that if I have a option such as

seemingly unlimited number of antibodies, all targeted specifically at

then which option is correct? E or whatever new option, which I have mentioned above

Guys ,

I did pick up E at the first reading of the snetence , as my ear was shouting that seemingly is the right word or adjective to be used here.
It will be good if someone can explain the exact grammatical construction and its necessity here. Can someone please do that, like seemingly and why not seeming etc etc
Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 79
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 20

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2010, 20:41
acer2knight wrote:
Guys ,

I did pick up E at the first reading of the snetence , as my ear was shouting that seemingly is the right word or adjective to be used here.
It will be good if someone can explain the exact grammatical construction and its necessity here. Can someone please do that, like seemingly and why not seeming etc etc

Simingly unlimited number - "Simingly" is an adverb here that modifies the adjective "unlimited". Only adverbs can modify adjectives. Here we cannot drop "unlimited".
Siming unlimited number - "Siming" is an adjective here that modifies the noun "number". In this case we can drop "unlimited"
Here "siming number" doesn't make sence, but "simingly unlimited..." is fine.
In every case you should check what modifies what.

Hope that helps.
Re: OG 11...Dr. Tonegawa   [#permalink] 02 Mar 2010, 20:41
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the 2 07 Oct 2010, 10:57
5 Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the 14 01 Dec 2008, 00:42
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the 1 20 Oct 2007, 18:19
6 Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the 18 06 Sep 2007, 13:48
Dr. Tonegawa won the Nobel Prize for discovering how the 1 12 Jul 2007, 09:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by