Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 31 Aug 2016, 01:56

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 70
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 4

Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2010, 13:55
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

93% (01:57) correct 7% (00:39) wrong based on 30 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who drive to work in the center of the city are facing a large increase in transportation expenses that will limit the funds they have available to spend in other areas. In order to forestall a slowdown in the local economy, the city council has decided that fares on all forms of public transportation will be suspended for the next three months. Clearly, if commuters can get to work more cheaply, they will have more money left over to spend in other sectors of the economy, and the city’s finances on the whole will not be negatively affected by higher gasoline prices.

Which of the following is an assumption underlying the plan to avoid a slowdown in the city’s economy?

* Three months is a sufficient period of time to allow gasoline prices to stabilize.
* Commuters who usually drive to work will begin taking public transportation if it is free.
* Other factors in the local economy are affecting the price of gasoline.
* The cost of parking in the city will remain relatively stable.
* People who work in the city are more likely to drive than to take public transportation.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 70
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 4

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2010, 13:59
Choice B is close but the only problem is that it would be free for only 3 months which means people could start going back using their cars once it is not free anymore which is after 3 months. More over if the price of gasoline stabilizes after 3 months then it might be a preferred choice for most of the people to take their own vehicle
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Posts: 395
Location: Chicago, IL
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 42 [1] , given: 17

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2010, 18:55
1
KUDOS
zest4mba wrote:
Choice B is close but the only problem is that it would be free for only 3 months which means people could start going back using their cars once it is not free anymore which is after 3 months. More over if the price of gasoline stabilizes after 3 months then it might be a preferred choice for most of the people to take their own vehicle

Try negate A and the gas prices won't fall. Well, may be in this case, the governor will extend the deal.

Negate B, the plan is useless.
_________________

Hard work is the main determinant of success

Manager
Joined: 11 May 2010
Posts: 224
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 11

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2010, 20:02
zest4mba wrote:
Choice B is close but the only problem is that it would be free for only 3 months which means people could start going back using their cars once it is not free anymore which is after 3 months. More over if the price of gasoline stabilizes after 3 months then it might be a preferred choice for most of the people to take their own vehicle

Thing is, even if the gas price stabilizes, it still is high and it will takes a lot of money out of the people's pocket and thus affect the economy.

The focus of the plan is on this 3 months period, we don't know whether there are any other plan after 3 months, so for now, it is good enough and thus B is correct.
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 694 [0], given: 36

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Aug 2010, 21:24
negate B and plan is useless.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 70
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 4

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2010, 04:25
what is the best approach to negate a choice.

for instance choice A is that gas prices may stabilize in 3 months.

so should i think what if they did not stabilize in 3 months. even then because
the other choice offers free commute so it should be the best choice.

where as if i negate choice b of free commute then there won't be any choice for commuters.

is that how you negate choices.

thanks
Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2010
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [2] , given: 1

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2010, 05:11
2
KUDOS
zest4mba wrote:
what is the best approach to negate a choice.

for instance choice A is that gas prices may stabilize in 3 months.

so should i think what if they did not stabilize in 3 months. even then because
the other choice offers free commute so it should be the best choice.

where as if i negate choice b of free commute then there won't be any choice for commuters.

is that how you negate choices.

thanks

Consider this :-

The argument is 'commuters who drive to work' centric.
Flow of thoughts : Gasoline Price has gone up,
therefore 'commuters who drive to work' are facing a large increase in transportation exps..
..therefore this will limit the funds they have available to spend in other areas ..
..and hence cause a slowdown in the local economy..
..Now, to address this issue the city council has come up with a plan..
..and the last sentence of the argument explains the rationale of this plan

Let us now evaluate each answer choice starting with :-

E: People who work in the city are more likely to drive than to take public transportation - If this would have been the case what's the point in suspending fares on all forms of public transport. Hence this cannot be an assumption.
D: The cost of parking in the city will remain relatively stable - Parking Cost is not within the scope of discussion
C: Other factors in the local economy are affecting the price of gasoline - Again, out of scope

Chocie A & B are pretty close. I would go with choice B - Commuters who usually drive to work will begin taking public transportation if it is free since, as mentioned earlier, the argument is commuters who drive to work centric. Negate this and the plan is useless.
_________________

Consider awarding Kudos if my post helps !!

Senior Manager
Status: Fighting on
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Posts: 318
Schools: UCLA (R1 interview-WL), UNC(R2--interview-ding) Oxford(R2-Admit), Kelley (R2- Admit ), McCombs(R2)
WE 1: SE - 1
WE 2: Engineer - 3
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 3

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2010, 14:47
* Three months is a sufficient period of time to allow gasoline prices to stabilize. < stabilizing of gasoline prices is out of scope>
* Commuters who usually drive to work will begin taking public transportation if it is free. <correcto>
* Other factors in the local economy are affecting the price of gasoline. <dont care about other factors>
* The cost of parking in the city will remain relatively stable. <does the argument talks about parking>
* People who work in the city are more likely to drive than to take public transportation. <this will kill the whole argument>
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 176
WE 1: 3 (Mining Operations)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 33

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2010, 00:24
I am in for B +1
_________________

Regards,
Invincible...
"The way to succeed is to double your error rate."
"Most people who succeed in the face of seemingly impossible conditions are people who simply don't know how to quit."

Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2009
Posts: 122
Location: india
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 10

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2010, 02:28
M WID B
Manager
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 70
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 4

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2010, 11:16
Premise-"Do to sharp rise in gas-....in other areas
Premise-"In order to forestall...fares will be suspended for 3 months.
Premise- If commuters can get to work more cheaply-they will have more money to spend...
conclusion-citys finances will not be affected by higher gasoline prices

without which assumption the conclusion can't live with
choice B

NOTE- TAKE A LOOK AT THE LAST PREMISE AND CONCLUSION. THAT is all we need to solve this question
Intern
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Posts: 17
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2010, 13:03
Surely B
Moderator
Status: battlecruiser, operational...
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 983
Schools: Carey '16
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 142 [0], given: 71

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Aug 2010, 15:39
it's B. And it's not A. And this is not a 700 level question. kthx.
_________________
Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 41
Schools: Haas, HBS, UNC, Duke, Kellogg, etc
WE 1: Investment Banking Domain, Functionally-Technology
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2010, 12:18
i would go with option B too...

of all ptions only A n B are close... but then gasoline prices stabilizing is out of context...since stabilise can mean that they wont peak n trough often...but then that stabilized price can still be out of reach of commuters...

hence option B seems the best...
Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 15

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Aug 2010, 17:16
very clearly B
seem to be a 650 question, at best
Senior Manager
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 471
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 129 [0], given: 24

Re: LET'S DISCUSS THIS CR QUESTION [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2010, 01:29
B is clearly more relevant than A ...even though A is not completely wrong
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 3346
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 1376

Kudos [?]: 10236 [0], given: 1854

Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 May 2015, 16:06
Re: Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who   [#permalink] 03 May 2015, 16:06
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 6 19 Feb 2013, 05:59
Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 2 16 Feb 2012, 19:03
1 Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 6 04 Dec 2011, 19:38
1 Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 14 02 Sep 2011, 05:57
11 Due to a sharp rise in the price of gasoline, commuters who 33 22 May 2010, 03:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by