Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 17 Sep 2014, 03:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 588
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 265 [2] , given: 20

GMAT Tests User
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink] New post 24 Nov 2012, 03:02
2
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (02:50) correct 40% (01:36) wrong based on 310 sessions
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance remains functional without breaking down. Sixty years
ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years, whereas now refrigerators operate continuously for more than
40 years on average. Thus, at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their
operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

KUDOS me if you feel my contribution has helped you.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Oct 2011
Posts: 225
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 440 Q33 V13
GMAT 2: 0 Q0 V0
GPA: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 44

Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink] New post 24 Nov 2012, 04:08
gmatbull wrote:
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance remains functional without breaking down. Sixty years
ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years, whereas now refrigerators operate continuously for more than
40 years on average. Thus, at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their
operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.



Y not C here???

C seems to be more Weaken the argument for me...
If there was good tech 60 yrs ago they would have had better life time for refrigerators....

Isn't this undermining argument???
Please explain
_________________

GMAT - Practice, Patience, Persistence
Kudos if u like :)

VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1096
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 264 [0], given: 67

Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink] New post 24 Nov 2012, 05:43
shanmugamgsn wrote:
gmatbull wrote:
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance remains functional without breaking down. Sixty years
ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years, whereas now refrigerators operate continuously for more than
40 years on average. Thus, at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their
operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.



Y not C here???

C seems to be more Weaken the argument for me...
If there was good tech 60 yrs ago they would have had better life time for refrigerators....

Isn't this undermining argument???
Please explain



Hi there

og-critical-reasoning-1-i-disagree-107699.html
refer to the link similar question....the above question is an interpretation of the question 1 CR section of OG 12 dealing with life expectancy....
hope that helps
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2012
Posts: 8
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 35

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink] New post 30 Oct 2013, 22:58
Could someone please explain this through options. I thought D was close.
3 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1068
Location: United States
Followers: 121

Kudos [?]: 1277 [3] , given: 119

Premium Member
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2013, 00:28
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Supernova29 wrote:
Could someone please explain this through options. I thought D was close.


Hi Supernova29

I'm glad to help.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: Sixty years ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years,
Fact: Now refrigerators operate continuously for more than 40 years on average.
Conclusion: at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Assumption: The comparison of average durability is valid. On the other hand, there is NO other factor that makes the estimation of average durability incorrect.

Question: Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
Wrong. "More refrigerators" says nothing about average durability increases or decreases. Thus, A does nothing to weaken the conclusion.

B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
Correct. B mentions that the comparison of the argument is INCORRECT because there is a factor virtually makes the average durability of refrigerators now increase than that of refrigerators in the past. Thus, B weakens the conclusion and is correct answer.

C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology that was not available sixty years ago.
Wrong. TEMPTING but wrong. C does not weaken the conclusion, but rather strengthens the conclusion. Why? Because C means a refrigerator now can live longer because of improved engineering technology.
==> So if there is NO engineering technology the average durability of refrigerators now may be only 15 years or equal that of a refrigerator sixty years ago.
==> On the other hand, that the average durability 15 years in the past without engineering technology = average durability 40 years now with improved engineering technology is a CORRECT comparison.

D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
Wrong. D means almost refrigerators now can live for 40 years whereas those in the past can live only for 15 years. Thus, that 15 years in the past = 40 years now is a CORRECT comparison. D strengthens the conclusion. D is wrong.

E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.
Wrong. E means the quality of refrigerators in the past is worse than in the current. Thus, if a refrigerator lived for 15 years sixty years ago, we definitely considered the refrigerator near the end of its life. Thus, E does not weaken the conclusion.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2012
Posts: 8
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V32
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 35

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink] New post 31 Oct 2013, 03:21
hi pqhai,
Thanks so much. It does help. I found the question a little twisted with clarity lacking in its stimulus and the question stem.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2013
Posts: 25
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 83

Re: "Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink] New post 02 Aug 2014, 22:25
shanmugamgsn wrote:
gmatbull wrote:
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance remains functional without breaking down. Sixty years
ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years, whereas now refrigerators operate continuously for more than
40 years on average. Thus, at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their
operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.



Y not C here???

C seems to be more Weaken the argument for me...
If there was good tech 60 yrs ago they would have had better life time for refrigerators....

Isn't this undermining argument???
Please explain



I too fell for "C", but I guess "C" would be more appropriate had the question asked us to weaken/undermines the CONCLUSION but not the argument..
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 20 Jul 2013
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 27

CAT Tests
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance [#permalink] New post 09 Aug 2014, 06:08
Amit0507 wrote:
shanmugamgsn wrote:
gmatbull wrote:
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance remains functional without breaking down. Sixty years
ago, average refrigerator durability was 15 years, whereas now refrigerators operate continuously for more than
40 years on average. Thus, at that time, people must have considered refrigerators to be nearing the end of their
operational life at an age that we now consider will leave many more working years.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

A: Today, many more households own refrigerators than did households sixty years ago.
B: Most of the improvements in durability in the past sixty years have been achieved through cutting down on the
number of refrigerators that break down in the first year of ownership.
C: Many of the refrigerators that last an extremely long time today do so only because of engineering technology
that was not available sixty years ago.
D: The proportion of refrigerators that break down when they are between 35 years and 40 years old is significantly
smaller today than is the proportion of refrigerators that break down after 40 years.
E: More refrigerators sixty years ago received regular service than receive it today.



Y not C here???

C seems to be more Weaken the argument for me...
If there was good tech 60 yrs ago they would have had better life time for refrigerators....

Isn't this undermining argument???
Please explain



I too fell for "C", but I guess "C" would be more appropriate had the question asked us to weaken/undermines the CONCLUSION but not the argument..


Well, the conclusion is basically stating the author's claim ---> which is the heart of the argument.
So, the conclusion is pretty much the argument.

C would be correct if this were a strengthen question. This choice is just an additional fact that aids the author's argument --- telling us that refrigerators do indeed live longer nowadays.

Instead, the correct answer is B.

B tells us that the cutdown on faulty refrigerators after the first year is one of the reasons for the improvement in refrigerator durability.
This tells us that even recently, there were refrigerators that don't last 40 years. In fact, they don't even live past the first year.
This fact completely destroys the argument, telling us that there are refrigerators nowadays that can't live past 40 years.
"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance   [#permalink] 09 Aug 2014, 06:08
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic The spending on durable goods such as household appliances carcass 6 26 May 2013, 16:49
6 Experts publish their posts in the topic The profit from the sale of a certain appliance increases Lstadt 2 20 Feb 2012, 14:50
1 23 The profit from the sale of a certain appliance luminousmocha 8 22 Jan 2010, 17:01
1 The profit from the sale of a certain appliance, with the no vermatanya 4 16 Jan 2008, 13:29
The spending on durable goods like household appliances and ArvGMAT 5 28 Jun 2007, 17:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

"Durability" is the measure of how long a certain appliance

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.