During his three years in office, the governor of a state : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 19:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# During his three years in office, the governor of a state

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 May 2004
Posts: 336
Location: USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 0

During his three years in office, the governor of a state [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 08:22
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:42) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

During his three years in office, the governor of a state has frequently been accused of having sexist attitudes toward women. Yet he has filled five of the nineteen vacant high-level positions in his administration with women appointees, all of whom are still serving. This shows that the governor is not sexist.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

A. One of the women appointed by the governor to a high-level position is planning to
resign her post.
B. The platform of the governorâ€™s political party required him to appoint at least five
women to high-level positions.
C. Forty-seven percent of the women who voted in the state gubernatorial election three
years ago voted for the governor
D. A governor of a neighboring state recently appointed seven women to high-level
positions
E. The governor appointed tow Black Americans, tow Hispanic Americans, and one Asian American to high-level positions in his administration.
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 851
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 08:48

Will explain if anyone differs
Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 184
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: CR governer and women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 08:53
boksana wrote:
During his three years in office, the governor of a state has frequently been accused of having sexist attitudes toward women. Yet he has filled five of the nineteen vacant high-level positions in his administration with women appointees, all of whom are still serving. This shows that the governor is not sexist.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

A. One of the women appointed by the governor to a high-level position is planning to
resign her post.
B. The platform of the governorâ€™s political party required him to appoint at least five
women to high-level positions.
C. Forty-seven percent of the women who voted in the state gubernatorial election three
years ago voted for the governor
D. A governor of a neighboring state recently appointed seven women to high-level
positions
E. The governor appointed tow Black Americans, tow Hispanic Americans, and one Asian American to high-level positions in his administration.

It seems like B to me. The governor had to do assign five women; if that were in his platform, he has no choice regarding that.

A. - who knows why she're resigning, maybe it's for personal reasons, nothing to do with the governor. Maybe after she leaves, he'll nominate another woman...

C. - this only strengthens the conclusion: if women vote for him, they must like him and wouldn't accuse him of being sexist during the following three years

D. - maybe, a long shot - does cast some doubt, but nothing really substantial - after all 5 vs 7 isn't that much of a difference

E. - out of scope, we're not talking about discrimination in general, but specifically about discrimination against women
_________________

Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 151
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 09:01
I think it is B. As choice B says that it was not the governor's choice to assign women but he was asked to do so by his political party..In this case, he might as well be indeed sexist towards women ..

None of the other choices sound correct to me..Agree with SmashingGraces's explanations.
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 964
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 127 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 09:19
with the B crowd. nothing else to add.
Director
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 577
Location: San Jose, CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Re: CR governer and women [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 09:48
B is correct
Others either strengthen the arg or are out of scope
Intern
Joined: 19 May 2004
Posts: 47
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 22:29
_________________

Don't drink and derive!

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 402
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2004, 05:45
I tend to differ here:

The conclusion is: "This shows government is not sexist".

Now consider (B), "He needs to appoint atleast 5 women". Which means he could have appointed more than five but he only appointed bare minimum, hence he is not sexist. In other words it stregthen the conclusion.

Though I can't argue which other choice fit the bill!!!
Manager
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 184
Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Jul 2004, 06:15
mba wrote:
I tend to differ here:

The conclusion is: "This shows government is not sexist".

Now consider (B), "He needs to appoint atleast 5 women". Which means he could have appointed more than five but he only appointed bare minimum, hence he is not sexist. In other words it stregthen the conclusion.

Though I can't argue which other choice fit the bill!!!

mba,

Which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

The conclusion: "The governor is not sexist"

We need to prove the stem: "The governor is sexist"

He is sexist, if he did just the bare minimum, see?
_________________

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 402
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 02:08

Yeah (B) it is.
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 402
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 02:09

Yeah! (B) is best.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 429 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2004, 04:27
B with the crowd. That was easy (22sec)
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

15 Jul 2004, 04:27
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 8 21 Jul 2009, 02:10
22 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 29 31 Mar 2009, 13:46
8 While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 10 27 Mar 2009, 03:04
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 5 19 Jun 2007, 17:31
While Governor Verdant has been in office, the state s 2 18 Mar 2007, 16:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by