Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Aug 2014, 06:59

Starting Soon:

Live Q&A Session with Cambridge Admissions Team   ||    Join Chat Room to Attend the Session


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company s total

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 746
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company s total [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2007, 12:27
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:00) wrong based on 3 sessions
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain.
Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way. Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices. Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation. Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.

B. The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.

C. The first has been used as a consideration to support adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy.

D. The first provides evidence in favor of adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to pursue an alternative goal.

E. The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second is the main conclusion that the argument is seeking to establish.

Appologies! Fixed the bold face.

Last edited by asaf on 28 Jul 2007, 14:20, edited 1 time in total.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR - GmatPrep BoldFace [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2007, 12:28
asaf wrote:
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain.
Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way. Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices. Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation. Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.

B. The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.

C. The first has been used as a consideration to support adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy.

D. The first provides evidence in favor of adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to pursue an alternative goal.

E. The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second is the main conclusion that the argument is seeking to establish.


What parts are "bold faced"?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 11
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Sep 2007, 16:45
Is it D?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 178
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2007, 01:40
its D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2007, 04:35
I go for B.

The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion - "During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain"

the second is that conclusion - "Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts".

This is tricky!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Posts: 94
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2007, 07:33
A. The first one is not ruling out any strategy.
B. Best Answer. First one supports conclusion, second one is the conclusion.
C. Second is not reporting the decision to adopt strategy, it reports the results of that strategy.
D. Second one does report decison to pursue alternative goal, goal is the same.
E. The first one is a consideration FOR not AGAINST.

My pick is B.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 374
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2007, 08:38
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain. <-- fact

Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts. <-- conclusion

hence, B.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 98
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2007, 17:08
B for me
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2007, 19:03
B gives the cloest fit. The rest are problematic.

A. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; --> no such thing

C. the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy. --> no decision made

D.the second reports a decision to pursue an alternative goal. --> no such thing

E. The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal --> no opposition to the strategy was presented.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 06 Sep 2007, 19:45
i picked B although not 100% confident
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Posts: 126
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - GmatPrep BoldFace [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2007, 04:14
asaf wrote:
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain.
Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way. Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices. Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation. Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.

B. The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.

Second part is conculsion and that is correct but I am not clear if we can say that first part is a judgment. So ruling out.
C. The first has been used as a consideration to support adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy.

Second is a conlusion i.e. decision to follow the alternate strategy. And first part does offer an considerdation and which logically tirggers rest of the argument. So I am picking this one as correct.

D. The first provides evidence in favor of adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to pursue an alternative goal.

E. The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second is the main conclusion that the argument is seeking to establish.

Appologies! Fixed the bold face.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2006
Posts: 216
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Sep 2007, 02:50
B is the closest for me.

With C the problem is the second bf as it does not offer a alternative strategy.
C. The first has been used as a consideration to support adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second reports a decision to adopt an alternative strategy.

first bf is an consideration to follow a strategy. But senond bf does not offer an alternative strategy.

E. The first is a consideration offered against adopting a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second is the main conclusion that the argument is seeking to establish.

first bf is not a consideration offered against adopting the strategy. thus it is wrong.

B. The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.

first bf is a judgement(kind of) in support of a conclusion.
I am not entirely convinced but still will go with it.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 296
Location: Russia, Moscow
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Sep 2007, 08:03
A for me
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 146
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 10 Oct 2007, 16:31
Agree with B
What's the OA?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 70
Schools: HBS '10
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Oct 2007, 17:00
OA is B (from GMATprep)
  [#permalink] 13 Oct 2007, 17:00
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company's total jkaustubh 4 02 Apr 2013, 17:55
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company s total ankur55 9 22 Jul 2009, 20:24
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company's total arorag 8 05 Oct 2008, 19:44
4 During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company s total goalsnr 11 26 May 2008, 07:33
During past yr, Pro-Tect insurance company's total payout on ronybtl 7 01 Dec 2005, 17:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company s total

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.