Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Oct 2014, 10:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

During the three months before and the three months after a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 940
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

During the three months before and the three months after a [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 16:36
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
During the three months before and the three months after a major earthquake in California, students at a college there happened to be keeping a record of their dreams. After experiencing the earthquake, half of the students reported dreaming about earthquakes. During the same six months, a group of college students in Ontario who had never experienced an earthquake also recorded their dreams. Almost none of the students in Ontario reported dreaming about earthquakes. So it is clear that experiencing an earthquake can cause people to dream about earthquakes.

Which of the following , if true, most strengthens the argument?

A) before the california earthquake, no more of the students in California than those in Ontario recorded dreams about earthquakes

b) the students in California were members of a class studying dreams and dream recollection, but the students in Ontario were not.

c) Before they started keeping records of their dreams,, many of the students in California had experienced at least one earthquake.

D) the students in Ontario reported having more dreams overall, per student, than the students in California did.

E) the students in Ontario who reported having dreams about earthquatkes recored the dreams as having occurred after the California earthquake.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Re: CR earthquake California [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 17:34
little confusing between A and C.

chosed A before. but should go with C.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Posts: 1071
Location: USA
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 18:33
Vote for (C)

A and E distantly support the same idea. C seems to support the conclusion better.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 940
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 18:44
oa is A


I also chose C at first
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Re: CR earthquake California [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 18:48
HIMALAYA wrote:
little confusing between A and C.

chosed A before. but should go with C.


i posted A before as "many" doesnot tell anymore. ok i was correct but could not stood with it for a long..............
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 940
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 18:51
its ok himalaya, this was a confusing one. I still dont get A. I used pOE to get to a and C
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 18:57
It is definitely A. The argument can be strengthened only if the group of people who have started seeing these dreams did not see it before the earthquake. A birgs out this reasoning.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 940
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 19:03
thanks plsubbu that makes sense
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1061
Location: CA
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 20:30
Yes answer is A

ETS loves to test these kind of questions where it presents ratios/numbers to present cause-effect :rocket

One way to weaken the argument is to find out the relative umber for the before event and see if the effect would still stand.
_________________

Don't be afraid to take a flying leap of faith.. If you risk nothing, than you gain nothing...

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2922
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 82 [0], given: 0

Re: CR earthquake California [#permalink] New post 22 Dec 2005, 23:24
HIMALAYA wrote:
HIMALAYA wrote:
little confusing between A and C.

chosed A before. but should go with C.


i posted A before as "many" doesnot tell anymore. ok i was correct but could not stood with it for a long..............


Himalaya, Always trust your first instinct. I was in the same situtation but got A due to first instinct.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1735
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 0

Re: CR earthquake California [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2005, 07:34
ps_dahiya wrote:
HIMALAYA wrote:
HIMALAYA wrote:
little confusing between A and C.

chosed A before. but should go with C.


i posted A before as "many" doesnot tell anymore. ok i was correct but could not stood with it for a long..............


Himalaya, Always trust your first instinct. I was in the same situtation but got A due to first instinct.


i will. thankx....................................
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1816
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 23 Dec 2005, 08:23
I got A. Here is my reasoning. Both califorians and ontarians recorded and recollected dreams. But if during the pre-earthquake period the size of earthquake dreamers are not realistically compared then the experiment would not lend support. So before the earthquake both the number of dreamer should be approximatley same.
  [#permalink] 23 Dec 2005, 08:23
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 510 to 700 in Three Months Tibby7734 1 10 Aug 2014, 06:46
4 Experts publish their posts in the topic Every three months an index of leading economic indicators rwj 7 27 Sep 2013, 23:01
2 SC - After three months - random test. tingjojo 2 26 Apr 2011, 06:21
During the 3 months before and the 3 months after major Jamesk486 10 11 May 2007, 15:59
1 Experts publish their posts in the topic Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months, aurobindo 10 31 Jan 2007, 06:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

During the three months before and the three months after a

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.