Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Each employee of a certain task force is either a manager or [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 May 2010, 07:01

6

This post received KUDOS

57

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (02:14) correct
43% (01:24) wrong based on 927 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Each employee of a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of the employees on the task force are directors?

(1) the average (arithmetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is 5000 less than the average salary of all the employees on the task force. (2) the average (arithmetic mean) salary of the directors on the task force is 15000 greater than the average salary of all the employees on the task force.

Each employee of a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of the employees on the task force are directors? 1) the average ( Arithemetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is 5000 less than the average salary of all the employees on the task force. 2) the average ( Arithemetic mean) salary of the directors on the task force is 15000 greater than the average salary of all the employees on the task force.

\(S_a\) - Average salary of all employees \(S_m\) - Average salary for manager \(S_d\) - Average salary of directors \(d\) - # of directors; \(m\) - # of managers. Question \(\frac{d}{m+d}=?\)

(1) \(S_m=S_a-5000\) --> Not sufficient to calculate ratio. (2) \(S_d=S_a+15000\) --> Not sufficient to calculate ratio.

(1)+(2) \(S_a=\frac{S_m*m+S_d*d}{d+m}\) --> substitute \(S_m\) and \(S_d\) --> \(S_a=\frac{(S_a-5000)*m+(S_a+15000)*d}{d+m}\) --> \(S_a*d+S_a*m=S_a*m-5000*m+S_a*d+15000*d\) --> \(S_a*d\) and \(S_a*m\) cancel out --> \(m=3d\) --> \(\frac{d}{m+d}=\frac{d}{3d+d}=\frac{1}{4}\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Or for (1)+(2): if we say that the fraction of the directors is \(x\) (\(x=\frac{d}{d+m}\)) then the fraction of the managers will be \((1-x)\) (\(1-x=\frac{m}{d+m}\)) --> \(S_a=x(S_a+15000)+(1-x)(S_a-5000)\) --> \(S_a=x*S_a+15000x+S_a-5000-x*S_a+5000x\) --> \(x=\frac{1}{4}\).
_________________

Re: NEED HELP - 2 DATA SUFFICIENCY PROBLEMS [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Jul 2010, 23:46

10

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

[quote2raulmaldonadomtz]I don't understand how can you get the number of employees from an average salary. Can someone explain this problem. For me neither of the 2 statements answer the question.[/quote2]

We can't get the number. We can get the ratio of director to total though.

This is a weighted average problem. From (1) and (2) together, we know that the managers are 5,000 smaller than the grand average, and that the directors are 15,000 greater than the grand average, or:

The managers are way closer to the grand average than are the directors. So, there must be way more managers than directors. In fact, there are 15000/5000 or 3 times as many managers as directors. So, the manager to director ratio is 3:1. Thus, the director to total ratio is 1:4, or 25%.

I discuss weighted average strategy in more detail here: mixtures-96284.html

(For question 2, whiplash's explanation was simply superb).

Each employee on a certain task force is either a manager or director. What percent of the employees on the task force are director? 1. The average (Arithmetic Mean) salary of the mangers on the task force is $5,000 less than the average salary of all employees on the task force. 2. The average (Arithmetic Mean) salary of the directors on the task force is $15,000 greater than the average salary of all employees on the task force.

Please follow posting guidelines (link in my signatures). Make sure to select PS or DS forums for your questions. Do not use general GMAT or other forums. Make sure to type in the correct topic title as per the guidelines and include the OA and 3 tags 1 each for source,difficulty and sub topic.

Finally, search for a question before posting as the same question might have been discussed before. This question has already been discussed before. Refer above for the solution.

Re: Percentage of salary of directors. [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Jan 2011, 23:37

2

This post received KUDOS

shan123 wrote:

In a work force, the employees are either managers or directors. What is the percentage of directors? (1) The average salary for manager is $5,000 less than the total average salary. (2) The average salary for directors is $15,000 more than the total average salary.

(1) : Tells us nothing about how many directors or managers (2) : Again tells us nothing about how many

(1+2) : Say average salary is x and there be m fraction of managers and hence (1-m) directors

m(x-5000) + (1-m)(x+15000) = x mx - 5000m + x + 15000 -mx - 15000m = x 15000 - 20000m = 0 m = (3/4) Hence fraction of directors = (1/4)

One has to understand the concept of weighted averages pretty well to understand my solution.

The point of a weighted average is to know how much weight to give these two individual groups, the managers and the directors.

Statement 1 tells how the managers' salaries relate to employee average but there is no information about how the directors' salaries relate to the employee average. Insufficient Eliminate A & D

Statement 2 tells how the directors' salaries relate to employee average but there is no information about how the managers' salaries relate to the employee average. Insufficient Eliminate B

Statements 1 and 2 together: The manager average is 5000 less than the combined average. The director average is 15000 greater than the combined average. The difference between the manager average and the director average is 20000.

If there were an equal number of managers and directors they would each be 10000 off of the combined average - that would be a 50/50 weighting. But the combined average is closer to the manager average, so there are more managers than directors. Use the above three numbers to know how much: the difference is 20000, and the combined average is three-quarters of the way towards the manager average.

Hence, 3/4 of the employees are managers & 1/4 are directors. Sufficient.

Hence C.
_________________

Hit kudos if my post helps you. You may send me a PM if you have any doubts about my solution or GMAT problems in general.

Let T be the total average salary. M be the no of Managers D be no of Directors.

1st Statement: Aveg salary of Managers is T-5000. 2nd Statement: Avg salary of Directors is T+15000

1st things first. None of the statements provide sufficient information when taken one at a time. So the answer is either C or E Combine two statements and you get one equation:

(T-5000)*M + (T+15000)*D = T*(M+D) (Average Salary of M * no of Managers + Average salary of D* no of directors = Total Average Salary T * (M+D)

solving this we get M=3D

So ratio of Directors = D/(D+M) = D/(D + 3D) = 1/4 = 0.25

To solve it under 2 minutes, I had to guess this one as C. You are provided two relationships: managers-all and directors-all. That should be likely enough to determine the number of managers and directors as note that the differences in average numbers are specific to the number of managers and directors.

To calculate, you can solve two equations such as: 1. Sm/m = (Sm+Sd)/(m+d) - 5000. 2. Sd/d = (Sm+Sd)/(m+d) + 15000.

You need to solve for d/m+d.
_________________

I am the master of my fate. I am the captain of my soul. Please consider giving +1 Kudos if deserved!

DS - If negative answer only, still sufficient. No need to find exact solution. PS - Always look at the answers first CR - Read the question stem first, hunt for conclusion SC - Meaning first, Grammar second RC - Mentally connect paragraphs as you proceed. Short = 2min, Long = 3-4 min

Re: Each employee of a certain task force is either a manager or [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2012, 07:56

1

This post received KUDOS

achan wrote:

Each employee of a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of the employees on the task force are directors?

(1) the average ( Arithemetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is 5000 less than the average salary of all the employees on the task force. (2) the average ( Arithemetic mean) salary of the directors on the task force is 15000 greater than the average salary of all the employees on the task force.

This is a question involving weighted average. Having two quantities \(Q_1\) and \(Q_2\) with averages \(a_1\) and \(a_2\) respectively, if the combined average is \(a\), and let assume that \(a_1>a>a_2,\) then we can write:

\(\frac{a_1Q_1+a_2Q_2}{Q_1+Q_2}=a\) from which \(a_1Q_1+a_2Q_2=aQ_1+aQ_2\) or \((a_1-a)Q_1=(a-a_2)Q_2,\) which means that the distances from the combined average are inversely proportional to the quantities. This equality we can also be written as \(\frac{a_1-a}{a-a_2}=\frac{Q_2}{Q_1}.\)

To answer the question it is enough to know the ratio between the two types of employees. In our case we have a certain number of managers \(Q_1\) and a certain number of directors \(Q_2.\) From the above, if we know the two differences between the combined average (average salary of all employees) and each type of average, then in fact we have the ratio between \(Q_1\) and \(Q_2.\) Sufficient

Answer C
_________________

PhD in Applied Mathematics Love GMAT Quant questions and running.

In a work force, the employees are either managers or directors. What is the percentage of directors? (1) the average salary for manager is $5,000 less than the total average salary. (2) the average salary for directors is $15,000 more than the total average salary.

Each employee on a certain task force is either a manager or director. What percent of the employees on the task force are director? 1. The average (Arithmetic Mean) salary of the mangers on the task force is $5,000 less than the average salary of all employees on the task force. 2. The average (Arithmetic Mean) salary of the directors on the task force is $15,000 greater than the average salary of all employees on the task force.

As Rich said, the right forum for this question is the DS forum.

The employees are a mix of managers and directors. We need to find the percentage of directors.

No statement alone gives you information on both managers and directors. We need to find whether both statements together are sufficient.

Use the scale method of weighted averages here.

w1/w2 = (A2 - Aavg)/(Aavg - A1) = 15000/5000 = 3:1 So for every 3 managers, there is one director. Hence, directors are 25% of the employees task force. Answer (C)

Let's call all employee A, manager M, and director D, so A=M+D. Their average salary is Sa, Sm, and Sd for A, M, and D respectively. The percentage of M and D are x% and y% respectively, so x+y=100%. We have the following equation: Sa=\frac{x*Sm+y*Sd}{x+y} or Sa=\frac{x*Sm+y*Sd}{100} Now consider the statement 1, it can be written as Sm=Sa-5000, not sufficient to determine x and y. The same for statement 2, it leads to Sd=Sa+15000, not sufficient to determine x and y. Nevertheless, using both statement, by eliminating the constant as follows: 3Sm+Sd=3*(Sa-5000)+(Sa+15000) 3Sm+Sd=4Sa Sa=\frac{3Sm+Sd}{4}=Sa=\frac{75Sm+25Sd}{100}

Bunuel - is my minimalist solution of just identifying 3 equations satisfactory?

Or do you recommend fully solving it out to see if I net a result?

Generally you can stop solving a DS question at the point you realize a statement is sufficient to get the answer. Note that for this question we don't need to solve for unknowns, we need to get the ratio of directors to total employees. I don't know what 3 equations are you talking about but the statements together are indeed sufficient to get the desired ratio and one can get this even not calculating its exact value.
_________________

Good question. While you can not figure out the number of manager and directors available, you still can manipulate the two equations to get a ratio or percentage. I didn't do any calculations but knowing that there where two statements that are relative to one another and that has factors that do not cancel one another out when setting up the equation to solve for the ratio is enough to conclude that C is the answer.

gmatclubot

Re: Each employee..
[#permalink]
06 Jan 2011, 09:56

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...