Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Jul 2016, 04:16
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Each of 200 large companies was asked whether it employed a

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1264
Location: Madrid
Followers: 27

Kudos [?]: 250 [0], given: 0

Each of 200 large companies was asked whether it employed a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2006, 05:16
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Each of 200 large companies was asked whether it employed a safety officer, an ombudsman, or a staff psychologist. 40 companies did not employ any of the three, while there were twice as many companies with a safety officer as there were with an ombudsman. The survey also found that there were three times as many companies with a staff psychologist as there were without one. Did more than 5 companies have an ombudsman and a safety officer but not a staff psychologist?

(1) 6 companies had an ombudsman, but neither a safety officer nor a staff psychologist.
(2) Each company that had a safety officer had either an ombudsman or a staff psychologist, and 6 companies had all three.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 40
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2006, 12:52
I get C

I come up with 34 which is greater than 5.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 72
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Kill me now [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2006, 13:53
Lets say the three sets are S, O and P.

Given that P = 3P' (since number that have psychologists are three times those that don't have psychologists)
Also P + P' = 200. (every set + its complement is the total sum)
Therefore P' = 50.
and P = 150.

Now the total within the sets is actually only 160, since 40 companies have none of the three.

Therefore thinking of a venn diagram and excluding P, (S only) + (O only ) + (O intersection S only) = 10.

A. says that of these (O only) = 6. Therefore O intersection S only (which is the question) must be 4 or less.

thus, A is sufficient... can't wrap my head around B yet, so answer should be A or D.

My problem is for this solution I am not able to use one of the specified critieria (S = 2 * O) - perhaps it comes into use in the second part.

MG
Kill me now   [#permalink] 29 Aug 2006, 13:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Each of 200 large companies was asked whether it employed a

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.