Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 05 May 2015, 22:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Each year companies in United States could save as much as

Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [2] , given: 2

Each year companies in United States could save as much as [#permalink]  26 Jun 2012, 05:21
2
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

61% (02:10) correct 39% (01:16) wrong based on 290 sessions
Each year companies in United States could save as much as $58 billion annually by preventing illness among employees and gain as much as$200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided offices with cleaner air.

(A) Same
(B) annually if they prevented employee illness and gain as much as $200 billion through worker performance improved by simply providing (C) annually in employee illness prevention and gain as much as$200 billion through worker performance improved by simply providing
(D) in employee illness prevention and gain as much as $200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided (E) by preventing illness among employees and gain as much as$200 billion through improved worker performance if they simply provided

Answer says E, however "preventing illness" and "if they simply provided" don't seem to be parallel...Any thoughts? A, B, C are out since "each year" makes "annually" redundant. Yet I don't see a good choice between D and E either
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by synecdoche on 26 Jun 2012, 07:01, edited 1 time in total.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2268
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 303

Kudos [?]: 2164 [0], given: 254

Re: SC Question [#permalink]  26 Jun 2012, 06:23
Expert's post
I request one and all to please underline the required parts. What does same mean? the entire sentence?These small things take a good toll of the energy
_________________
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1835
Followers: 1439

Kudos [?]: 4343 [3] , given: 211

Re: SC Question [#permalink]  26 Jun 2012, 07:09
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi there,

Each year companies in United States could save as much as $58 billion annually by preventing illness among employees and gain as much as$200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided offices with cleaner air.

You have eliminated choice A, B, and C correctly for redundancy issue.

This is the sentence with Choice D: Each year companies in United States could save as much as $58 billion in employee illness prevention and gain as much as$200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided offices with cleaner air.

There are two issues with this sentence.
1. “employee illness prevention” seems to be some program or the name of some policy that the companies seem to have. Preposition “in” makes it sound like one. This is not very idiomatic per the context of the sentence. The sentence is saying is “how” companies could save. It could “by” doing a certain thing. Hence, “in employee prevention” does not fit here.
2. The phrase “through improving performance of workers” is not idiomatic again. After “through” we need a noun entity because “through” is a preposition. “improving” suggests an action here.

Choice E is an error free answer choice. It uses all the expressions correctly.

Now, the entities that need to be parallel are “could save as much as…” and “(could) gain as much as…”, because these are the two things that the companies in the US could do. These two entities are parallel.

Another thing is that this sentence has the “if… then…” construction. However, the “if” clause appears later in this sentence. The “then” clause is written in past tense “could save” and “could gain”. So the “if” clause should also be in past tense. In choice E, both these clause are in past tense.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________

Learn how eGMATers improved their GMAT scores by 100+ points - Click here

Learn about our newly released Quant Online course here.

Intern
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 2

Re: SC Question [#permalink]  26 Jun 2012, 07:20
egmat wrote:
Hi there,

Each year companies in United States could save as much as $58 billion annually by preventing illness among employees and gain as much as$200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided offices with cleaner air.

You have eliminated choice A, B, and C correctly for redundancy issue.

This is the sentence with Choice D: Each year companies in United States could save as much as $58 billion in employee illness prevention and gain as much as$200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided offices with cleaner air.

There are two issues with this sentence.
1. “employee illness prevention” seems to be some program or the name of some policy that the companies seem to have. Preposition “in” makes it sound like one. This is not very idiomatic per the context of the sentence. The sentence is saying is “how” companies could save. It could “by” doing a certain thing. Hence, “in employee prevention” does not fit here.
2. The phrase “through improving performance of workers” is not idiomatic again. After “through” we need a noun entity because “through” is a preposition. “improving” suggests an action here.

Choice E is an error free answer choice. It uses all the expressions correctly.

Now, the entities that need to be parallel are “could save as much as…” and “(could) gain as much as…”, because these are the two things that the companies in the US could do. These two entities are parallel.

Another thing is that this sentence has the “if… then…” construction. However, the “if” clause appears later in this sentence. The “then” clause is written in past tense “could save” and “could gain”. So the “if” clause should also be in past tense. In choice E, both these clause are in past tense.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.

Hi, I wasn't saying D is correct instead of E. When I saw it, I couldn't decide what to answer. You're correct about the "employee illness prevention", but in E, shouldn't it be "through improved worker performance by simply providing offices" instead of "through improved worker performance if they simply provided offices" as that'd be parallel to "by preventing illness....". That's the part I'm not sure about.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1835
Followers: 1439

Kudos [?]: 4343 [3] , given: 211

Re: SC Question [#permalink]  26 Jun 2012, 07:53
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
synecdoche wrote:
Hi, I wasn't saying D is correct instead of E. When I saw it, I couldn't decide what to answer. You're correct about the "employee illness prevention", but in E, shouldn't it be "through improved worker performance by simply providing offices" instead of "through improved worker performance if they simply provided offices" as that'd be parallel to "by preventing illness....". That's the part I'm not sure about.

Hi,

If you read Choice E carefully, you will see that the two entities that are parallel are:
a. could save as much as $58 billion by preventing illness among employees b. could gain as much as$200 billion through improved worker performance

If you carefully analyze these two entities, you will see that the first part till “billion” are absolutely parallel to each other and there is no confusion about that. Now, what should be parallel to “by preventing illness among employees” is “through improved worker performance”. Why? It is because the companies could save “by” preventing illness among employees, and the companies could gain “through” improved worker performance. The ways how companies could save and gain have been written in prepositional phrases beginning with “by” and “through” respectively.

Structurally again “verb-ing modifier” preventing illness among employees” and verb-ed modifier “improved worker performance” are parallel.

The important thing is to identify the correct parallel list. Now the gains could not be made by providing offices with cleaner air. This is a condition.

If the companies provided offices with cleaner air, then they could do things (these need to be parallel):
a. could save as much as $58 billion by preventing illness among employees b. could gain as much as$200 billion through improved worker performance

Cleaner air could not just help the companies gain by doing something but also help them save by doing something. Both these things could be the outcome if the companies provided the offices with cleaner air. Hence, the two outcomes should be parallel. By making “by preventing…” and “by providing…”, we will make the condition parallel to just one of the outcomes, and this is not logical per the context of the sentence.

Hence, make sure to identify the correct list in the sentence to ensure correct parallelism.

Hope this helps.
_________________

Learn how eGMATers improved their GMAT scores by 100+ points - Click here

Learn about our newly released Quant Online course here.

Last edited by egmat on 26 Jun 2012, 08:06, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 29
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 2

Re: SC Question [#permalink]  26 Jun 2012, 08:03
egmat wrote:
Structurally again “verb-ing modifier” preventing illness among employees” and verb-ed modifier “improved worker performance” are parallel.

The important this is to identify the correct parallel list. Now the gains could not be made by providing offices with cleaner air. This is a condition.

That really helps. Thanks a lot!
Forum Moderator
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1408
GPA: 3.77
Followers: 167

Kudos [?]: 625 [0], given: 610

Re: Each year companies in United States could save as much as [#permalink]  26 Jun 2012, 12:56
synecdoche wrote:
Each year companies in United States could save as much as $58 billion annually by preventing illness among employees and gain as much as$200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided offices with cleaner air.

(A) Same
(B) annually if they prevented employee illness and gain as much as $200 billion through worker performance improved by simply providing (C) annually in employee illness prevention and gain as much as$200 billion through worker performance improved by simply providing
(D) in employee illness prevention and gain as much as $200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided (E) by preventing illness among employees and gain as much as$200 billion through improved worker performance if they simply provided

Take it Simple dude,

In the beginning of the sentence you see Each year, all choices except E and D have annually, so get rid of them.

In D "they" wrongly refers to employees when the sentence intends to say it about companies. SO D is wrong.
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2011
Posts: 87
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [1] , given: 21

Re: Each year companies in United States could save as much as [#permalink]  27 Jun 2012, 00:56
1
KUDOS
ABC is are redundant as Each year with annually is not acceptable

(D) in employee illness prevention
Quote:
(save in employee illness prevention is not idiomatic)
and gain as much as $200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided (E) by preventing illness among employees Quote: (Object of Verb Save) and gain Quote: (parallel with save) as much as$200 billion through improved worker performance if they simply provided
I think E is the right answer
Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 134
Location: India
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 209 [0], given: 33

Re: Each year companies in United States could save as much as [#permalink]  27 Jun 2012, 18:54
synecdoche wrote:
Each year companies in United States could save as much as $58 billion annually by preventing illness among employees and gain as much as$200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided offices with cleaner air.

(D) in employee illness prevention and gain as much as $200 billion through improving performance of workers if they simply provided (E) by preventing illness among employees and gain as much as$200 billion through improved worker performance if they simply provided

Answer says E, however "preventing illness" and "if they simply provided" don't seem to be parallel...Any thoughts? A, B, C are out since "each year" makes "annually" redundant. Yet I don't see a good choice between D and E either

In case of D, "they" could refer to companies or workers.
In E, this pronoun-antecedent is fixed by using "improved worker performance"if they simply provided. In case of E, they can refer only to companies. Hence i chose E.
_________________

Encourage me by pressing the KUDOS if you find my post to be helpful.

Help me win "The One Thing You Wish You Knew - GMAT Club Contest"
the-one-thing-you-wish-you-knew-gmat-club-contest-140358.html#p1130989

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2268
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 303

Kudos [?]: 2164 [0], given: 254

Re: Each year companies in United States could save as much as [#permalink]  27 Jun 2012, 23:35
Expert's post
I think the employees are no contenders for the antecedence of –they - in D or E. After all employees are not expected to provide cleaner offices; the onus of that lies on the companies.

The more serious problem is the categorization as – in employee illness prevention -. Even in E , the phrase –improved worker performance – can be improved to – improved workers’ performance –Overall , it is ok to go with E.
_________________
CEO
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3817
Followers: 425

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 0

Re: Each year companies in United States could save as much as [#permalink]  09 Nov 2013, 07:21
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 129
Schools: IIMA
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 66

Re: Each year companies in United States could save as much as [#permalink]  18 Sep 2014, 22:21
Look at sentence specially non underlined part, it will always help to eliminate few options

Like in this sentence : started with Each year and annually (Redundant )

Left with now D and E , here we are talking how company can save in D it says in employee illness (wrong )
_________________

If you are not over prepared then you are under prepared !!!

Re: Each year companies in United States could save as much as   [#permalink] 18 Sep 2014, 22:21
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Each year companies in the United State could save as much 12 18 Jul 2012, 15:58
1 A person saves each year Rs 100 more than he saved in the 5 04 Apr 2012, 19:16
SC- Companies in the United State 9 08 Jan 2009, 03:49
In 1980 the United States exported twice as much of its 6 29 Oct 2005, 08:12
In 1980 the United States exported twice as much of its 5 03 Oct 2005, 15:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by