|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 162
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
12
[2] , given: 15
|
Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in [#permalink]
13 Sep 2011, 07:00
2
This post received KUDOS
Question Stats:
46% (02:40) correct
53% (01:37) wrong based on 3 sessions
Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers.A. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers. B. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century did philosophers question the view of him as a teacher of evil. C. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, in France and England particularly, considered Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers. D. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince to be a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century philosophers was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned. E. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century was the view of him as a teacher of evil questioned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 162
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 15
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Sep 2011, 07:00
Really need a better explanation for this
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 1987
Location: India
Followers: 130
Kudos [?]:
667
[0], given: 170
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Sep 2011, 08:55
Please ponder whether A is //. The first part is active and the second part is passive. On the contrary, E is better balanced with both the first and second parts being // with passive voices. You might note choices A through D are parallelly discordant.
_________________
” I truly believe in online learning, I have been a student in both an Ivy League school (brick and mortar) and in an online setting and I have learned 1,000 times more in an online setting. You do not have anyone there lecturing you and then you do the work, online you are made to do it all yourself. Amazing how different the results are. - Heather(a student)”
Alicia Helle, an online student at the UW, "Obtaining my degree online has been a blessing. With two small children, I am able to work when it is convenient for my family and me. I have nothing but positive comments and experiences from my time at UW-Stout.”
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2100
Followers: 108
Kudos [?]:
655
[0], given: 376
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Sep 2011, 09:07
jitbec wrote: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers.
A. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers.
"particularly in France and England" correctly modifies philosophers right before the comma. "regarded..as" is the correct idiom: Regarded to be, considered to be OR considered as are all not preferred. Only concern is the following: the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned It means that the "view of etc.." was questioned. Also, how can view be a teacher(view of Machiavelli as a teacher of etc..) "Machiavelli can be a teacher." "View can remotely be a teaching Or perception" Something just doesn't fit in. Other options have idiomatic errors as I have pointed out.
_________________
~fluke
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 162
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
12
[2] , given: 15
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Sep 2011, 10:28
2
This post received KUDOS
Correct Answer: A Explanation: Note the idioms ‘regarded as something’ and ‘consider something’. In other words we don’t put ‘to be’ after regard or consider, and neither do we put ‘as’ after consider. This information helps us to eliminate C and D. next we turn our attention to word order. The order in B and E suggests that the ‘precepts’ were by the moralist philosophers. And so we are left with A. Also note that the use of ‘him’ in B and E is inappropriate as we haven’t previously mentioned Machiavelli (Machiavelli’s The Prince is not the same as Machiavelli!) Note that the correct answer includes the passive voice ‘was questioned by’, and so, although the active voice is usually better than the passive, there are some cases where passives are found in correct answers.
This was the explanation .. quite strange if I can say so
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 162
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 15
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Sep 2011, 10:30
Hi fluke, Please let us know if the explanation given for E not being right is valid
|
|
|
|
|
|
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2100
Followers: 108
Kudos [?]:
655
[0], given: 376
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Sep 2011, 10:41
jitbec wrote: Hi fluke, Please let us know if the explanation given for E not being right is valid Yes, that's correct. It is not a hard and fast rule, but it is indeed given due consideration. Machiavelli's: is possessive. So, only the possessive pronoun "his" can replace it, not him, which is objective. Also, Machiavelli's The Prince is the noun. "him" can't refer to a book, art, non-human nouns. "A" seems correct, except the minor glitch that I mentioned in my earlier post and that I'm doubtful about.
_________________
~fluke
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 162
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 15
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Sep 2011, 10:50
Ok got it. One more follow up question. I got tripped on the parallism . In A both active voice and passive voice are used . Is it valid in parallel constructions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Math Forum Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 2100
Followers: 108
Kudos [?]:
655
[0], given: 376
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Sep 2011, 11:35
jitbec wrote: Ok got it. One more follow up question. I got tripped on the parallism . In A both active voice and passive voice are used . Is it valid in parallel constructions? I know it's bit awkward, but we don't have a better choice. I don't know any definite rule to rule this option out just on the basis of its passiveness, but given a choice, I'd prefer active. This question is not from official GMAT source and I would not waste too much of my time on this.
_________________
~fluke
Find out what's new at GMAT Club - latest features and updates
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Status: MBAing!!!!
Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 314
Location: United States (FL)
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate
Schools: Wharton '14 (D), CBS '14 (WL), Ross '14 (WL), Haas '14 (D), Johnson '14 (A), McCombs '14, Kenan-Flagler '14 (M), Madison (A), Consortium (D), Consortium (A), Consortium (M), Consortium, Consortium (A), Consortium (WL)
GPA: 3.65
WE: Project Management (Real Estate)
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
41
[0], given: 56
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
14 Sep 2011, 18:48
I fell for C...but I see why A is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 335
Location: Azerbaijan
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
68
[0], given: 67
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
24 Sep 2011, 10:05
Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers.A. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers. CORRECT!B. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century did philosophers question the view of him as a teacher of evil. C. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, in France and England particularly, considered Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers. D. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince to be a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century philosophers was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned. E. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century was the view of him as a teacher of evil questioned.
_________________
Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 214
Location: Singapore
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 12
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
26 Sep 2011, 02:47
jitbec wrote: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers.
A. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers. B. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century did philosophers question the view of him as a teacher of evil. C. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, in France and England particularly, considered Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers. D. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince to be a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century philosophers was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned. E. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century was the view of him as a teacher of evil questioned. I went with A Good observation by LalaB
_________________
Thanks and Regards, GM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 596
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
25
[0], given: 16
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
27 Sep 2011, 04:30
+1 A B is using passive voice so out of the options
_________________
+1 Kudos If found helpful..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2010
Posts: 212
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 28
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
27 Sep 2011, 05:26
I also got trapped by E but now I know why A is correct
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 192
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37 GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27 GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Other (Other)
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 43
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Oct 2011, 02:50
jitbec wrote: Correct Answer: A Explanation: Note the idioms ‘regarded as something’ and ‘consider something’. In other words we don’t put ‘to be’ after regard or consider, and neither do we put ‘as’ after consider. This information helps us to eliminate C and D. next we turn our attention to word order. The order in B and E suggests that the ‘precepts’ were by the moralist philosophers. And so we are left with A. Also note that the use of ‘him’ in B and E is inappropriate as we haven’t previously mentioned Machiavelli (Machiavelli’s The Prince is not the same as Machiavelli!) Note that the correct answer includes the passive voice ‘was questioned by’, and so, although the active voice is usually better than the passive, there are some cases where passives are found in correct answers.
This was the explanation .. quite strange if I can say so Yes, this is a good explanation..I had picked B because I ignored the use of him and the second half of A was passive. But now I can see why A is correct. We got to choose the best option
_________________
If my post did a dance in your mind, send me the steps through kudos :)
My MBA journey at http://mbadilemma.wordpress.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Essaying
Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 158
Location: Ghana
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GPA: 3.9
WE: Accounting (Education)
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 8
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
13 Oct 2011, 04:40
I was torn between A and E. Since the "Him" in statement E has no antecedent... it is also wrong. +1 for A
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: MLT Fellowship - MBA Prep
Affiliations: Beta Gamma Sigma - Business Honors Society, FINRA Securities Licenses, CA Insurance Licenses
Joined: 29 Nov 2010
Posts: 174
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38 GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.47
WE: Sales (Retail Banking)
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
23
[0], given: 8
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
14 Oct 2011, 15:57
Definitely A... took awhile to break them all apart... but no doubt
_________________
Brandon Hoffman http://www.linkedin.com/in/bdhoffman
Management Leadership of Tomorrow (MLT) - MBA Programs Fellow MLT LA Chapter - Board Member / Recruiting Officer Net Impact - Professional Chapter Co-President MBADiversity Organization - Global Fellow, CHINA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: MLT Fellowship - MBA Prep
Affiliations: Beta Gamma Sigma - Business Honors Society, FINRA Securities Licenses, CA Insurance Licenses
Joined: 29 Nov 2010
Posts: 174
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V38 GMAT 2: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.47
WE: Sales (Retail Banking)
Followers: 4
Kudos [?]:
23
[0], given: 8
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers [#permalink]
14 Oct 2011, 16:10
Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers.A. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers. ACTIVE VOICE philosophers regarded... opposed to regarded by philosophers IDIOMATIC regarded as Machiavelli, referenced for first time, is teacher of evilB. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century did philosophers question the view of him as a teacher of evil. HIM has no noun... 'possessive poision'. 'Machiavelli's' cannot be the noun referenced by HIM. C. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, in France and England particularly, considered Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers. CONSIDERED TO BE is correct idiomD. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince to be a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century philosophers was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned. REGARDED AS is correct idiomE. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century was the view of him as a teacher of evil questioned. HIM has no noun... 'possessive poision'. 'Machiavelli's' cannot be the noun referenced by HIM. KUDOS if helped! :D ... or let me know if I am wrong.
_________________
Brandon Hoffman http://www.linkedin.com/in/bdhoffman
Management Leadership of Tomorrow (MLT) - MBA Programs Fellow MLT LA Chapter - Board Member / Recruiting Officer Net Impact - Professional Chapter Co-President MBADiversity Organization - Global Fellow, CHINA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 205
GPA: 3.5
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
4
[0], given: 51
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in [#permalink]
12 Jan 2012, 23:55
Chose E but understand why it is A.Good question and good explanation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1082
Followers: 508
Kudos [?]:
1052
[3] , given: 131
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in [#permalink]
13 Jan 2012, 08:39
3
This post received KUDOS
Hi, Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers. POE:A. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers.: Correct. 1. This choice used correct idioms “regarded as”. 2. PS: An entity written in active voice can very well be parallel to the entity written in passive voice. The entities must be parallel to the extent that they keeping the logical meaning of the sentence intact and by maintaining the grammar structure to do so. Refer to OG 12#36. 3. (This is for fluke) For better understanding, let us rewrite the latter half of the sentence as: …, and the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil was not questioned by philosophers until the 17th Century. This sentence is grammatically sound. The syntax has been changed a bit in the original sentence for stylistic reason. B. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century did philosophers question the view of him as a teacher of evil.: Incorrect. 1. Reference of “him” is not correct in this choice. Pronouns can only refer to nouns and other pronouns. In this choice, “him” cannot refer to “Machiavelli’s” because it is neither noun nor a pronoun. Used in possessive form, this word acts like an adjective modifying “The Prince”. It shows that “The Prince” was written by Machiavelli. C. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, in France and England particularly, considered Machiavelli’s The Prince as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned by philosophers.: Incorrect. 1. Use of “as” after considered” is unidiomatic. D. Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, regarded Machiavelli’s The Prince to be a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants, and not until the 17th Century philosophers was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil questioned.: Incorrect. 1. Use of “to be” is unidiomatic after “regarded”. 2. “philosophers was the view of Machiavelli as a teacher of evil” is absolutely ungrammatical. E. Machiavelli’s The Prince was regarded as a collection of cynical precepts for tyrants by early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in France and England, and not until the 17th Century was the view of him as a teacher of evil questioned. Incorrect. 1. Same pronoun reference error as in choice B.  1. Entities in a parallel list must be grammatically parallel to the extent that they maintain the logical meaning of the sentence. 2. We must use idiomatic expressions. 3. Pronouns can only refer to nouns and other pronouns. The concepts tested in this sentence have been covered in e-gmat concepts: 1. Level 1 – Pronouns (This concept features in ‘Level 1 Preview Concepts’ that is available in Free Trail,. Just register and learn) 2. Level 1– Parallelism – Identify & Correct 3. Level 1 – Parallelism – Helpful Tips Hope this helps. Shraddha
_________________
Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions) Free Session (May 25): : Learn how to master Sentence Correction. Click here to attend.
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Early 16th Century moralist philosophers, particularly in
[#permalink]
13 Jan 2012, 08:39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|