Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 27 Apr 2015, 12:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Early in the development of a new product line, the critical

Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1634
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 36

Kudos [?]: 397 [2] , given: 2

Early in the development of a new product line, the critical [#permalink]  20 Jul 2010, 12:10
2
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

68% (03:11) correct 32% (01:53) wrong based on 144 sessions
Early in the development of a new product line, the critical resource is talent. New marketing ventures require a degree of managerial skill disproportionate to their short-term revenue prospects. Usually, however, talented managers are assigned only to established high-revenue product lines and, as a result, most new marketing ventures fail. Contrary to current practice, the best managers in a company should be assigned to development projects.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the author’s argument?
(A) On average, new ventures under the direction of managers at executive level survive no longer than those managed by lower-ranking managers.
(B) For most established companies, the development of new product lines is a relatively small part of the company’s total expenditure.
(C) The more talented a manager is, the less likely he or she is to be interested in undertaking the development of a new product line.
(D) The current revenue and profitability of an established product line can be maintained even if the company’s best managers are assigned elsewhere.
(E) Early short-term revenue prospects of a new product line are usually a good predictor of how successful a product line will ultimately be.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Posts: 447
GMAT 1: Q V
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 157

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  20 Jul 2010, 13:58
noboru wrote:
Early in the development of a new product line, the critical resource is talent. New marketing ventures require a degree of managerial skill disproportionate to their short-term revenue prospects. Usually, however, talented managers are assigned only to established high-revenue product lines and, as a result, most new marketing ventures fail. Contrary to current practice, the best managers in a company should be assigned to development projects.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the author’s argument?

D
New Product Dev requires talent.
New Marketing ventures require ... just extra text.
Talented managers are assigned to established products, but they should be assigned to new product dev.
Support-The revenue and profitability of an established product can be maintained even without good managers, because if it was not possible the profit and revenue from established products would not be risked for new products.
took 5 min.

(A) On average, new ventures under the direction of managers at executive level survive no longer than those managed by lower-ranking managers.
(B) For most established companies, the development of new product lines is a relatively small part of the company’s total expenditure.
(C) The more talented a manager is, the less likely he or she is to be interested in undertaking the development of a new product line.
(D) The current revenue and profitability of an established product line can be maintained even if the company’s best managers are assigned elsewhere.
(E) Early short-term revenue prospects of a new product line are usually a good predictor of how successful a product line will ultimately be.

_________________

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 994
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: [color=#0000FF]Chicago Booth Class of 2015 [/color] - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Retail Banking)
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 476 [0], given: 36

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  20 Jul 2010, 19:57
D is not the obvious answer in the question. To quickly find the answer Negate D. If the profits cannot be maintained after reassignment of managers then its bad policy. Argument falls apart.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 442
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 112

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  21 Jul 2010, 07:14
D --- dont know but relatively straight forward for me
SVP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1560
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 276 [1] , given: 6

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  23 Jul 2010, 13:03
1
KUDOS
D for me.

If company's profitability of an established product line can be maintained by assigning the company’s best managers elsewhere then the conclusion that the best managers in a company should be assigned to development projects is strengthened.
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 194
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  27 Jul 2010, 23:46
D ......for me too ........

nusmavrik wrote:
D is not the obvious answer in the question. To quickly find the answer Negate D. If the profits cannot be maintained after reassignment of managers then its bad policy. Argument falls apart.

I couldn't quite understand it ?
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: Chicago Booth Class of 2015
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 994
Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: [color=#0000FF]Chicago Booth Class of 2015 [/color] - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Retail Banking)
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 476 [0], given: 36

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  28 Jul 2010, 00:22
Sorry one liner.

Logical Negative: (D) The current revenue and profitability of an established product line CANNOT be maintained if the company’s best managers are assigned elsewhere. -----> This destroys the argument.

Hope this is clear.
vudsri000 wrote:

nusmavrik wrote:
D is not the obvious answer in the question. To quickly find the answer Negate D. If the profits cannot be maintained after reassignment of managers then its bad policy. Argument falls apart.

I couldn't quite understand it ?

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2010
Posts: 111
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 9

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  28 Jul 2010, 01:35
D for me too .. Took arnd 4:30 mins to me.. I am little poor in CRs thou..
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 66
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 3

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  28 Jul 2010, 01:48
D it is as it proves that establish lines can work fine with / without best managers, so they can be used to develop new line of work.
Manager
Joined: 01 Jul 2010
Posts: 53
Schools: LBS, Harvard, Booth, Stanford, ISB, NTU
WE 1: S/W Engineer
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 15

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  06 Aug 2010, 09:41
D for me too! Got it straight! :D
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2010
Posts: 334
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 7

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  06 Aug 2010, 19:48
D it should be!
Current Student
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 471
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Marketing (Other)
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 24

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  11 Sep 2010, 07:23
Easy
_________________

Kidchaos

http://www.laptopskinvault.com

Follow The Laptop Skin Vault on:

Consider Kudos if you think the Post is good
Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot. Nothing is going to change. It's not. - Dr. Seuss

Manager
Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 186
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 11

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  11 Sep 2010, 15:50
Conclusion:
the best managers in a company should be assigned to development projects.

Argument:
talented managers are assigned only to established high-revenue product lines and, as a result, most new marketing ventures fail

To strengthen the conclusion we have to prove that by assigning the talented managers to other than well established product lines, the profit of the company is not getting hampered.

D clearly states that The current revenue and profitability of an established product line can be maintained even if the company’s best managers are assigned elsewhere.

D is correct
Senior Manager
Status: Time to step up the tempo
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 409
Location: Milky way
Schools: ISB, Tepper - CMU, Chicago Booth, LSB
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 133 [0], given: 50

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  11 Sep 2010, 15:58
D seemed to be pretty logical and obvious to me.
_________________

Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog

Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Posts: 51
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  13 Oct 2010, 21:10
D is the straight ans..as othrs are not suitable.
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2010
Posts: 98
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  14 Oct 2010, 09:08
definately d is not an answer.

(D) The current revenue and profitability of an established product line can be maintained even if the company’s best managers are assigned elsewhere.

It talking about the revunue and profitability...no where discussed about the profits and revenue bcoz of company's best managers...

my ans is C and it looks wins.

Let me know if it is wrong.
Manager
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Posts: 236
Location: India
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 21

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  14 Oct 2010, 09:15
I found it somewhat straight D.
Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2010
Posts: 193
Location: Finland
Schools: Admitted: IESE(),HEC, RSM,Esade
WE 1: 3.5 years international
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 69 [0], given: 18

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  14 Oct 2010, 10:36
noboru wrote:
Early in the development of a new product line, the critical resource is talent. New marketing ventures require a degree of managerial skill disproportionate to their short-term revenue prospects. Usually, however, talented managers are assigned only to established high-revenue product lines and, as a result, most new marketing ventures fail. Contrary to current practice, the best managers in a company should be assigned to development projects.
Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the author’s argument?
(A) On average, new ventures under the direction of managers at executive level survive no longer than those managed by lower-ranking managers.
(B) For most established companies, the development of new product lines is a relatively small part of the company’s total expenditure.
(C) The more talented a manager is, the less likely he or she is to be interested in undertaking the development of a new product line.
(D) The current revenue and profitability of an established product line can be maintained even if the company’s best managers are assigned elsewhere.
(E) Early short-term revenue prospects of a new product line are usually a good predictor of how successful a product line will ultimately be.

D for me too
Manager
Joined: 22 Jun 2010
Posts: 212
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 13

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  15 Oct 2010, 08:49
another D
SVP
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Posts: 1687
Location: United States (IN)
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 340 [0], given: 36

Re: talented managers [#permalink]  30 Mar 2011, 23:35
The answer is D - it eliminates a reason that may weaken the assunmption.
_________________

Formula of Life -> Achievement/Potential = k * Happiness (where k is a constant)

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Re: talented managers   [#permalink] 30 Mar 2011, 23:35

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 24 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Despite the criticism in the early 1890’s 0 09 Jul 2014, 10:05
3 despite the criticism in the early 1890's 10 20 Jul 2012, 18:52
Phd - Marketing - New Product Development and Brand Building 0 17 Jul 2012, 03:09
1 Early in the development of a new product line, the critical 5 08 Apr 2011, 03:05
Cranfield new MSC Global Product Development and Management 0 08 Jun 2010, 01:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by