|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2011
Posts: 20
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR: Lake Konfa [#permalink]
 23 Aug 2011, 18:38
crackHSW wrote: Why is A opted out , how does one know that industrail development effects are not being taken into consideration here ?? A put industry development, which is not relevant. The whole passage is talking about Oil construction, technology, pollution. We should find some OA mention something related.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Status: Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 192
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Other (Other)
Followers: 5
Kudos [?]:
22
[0], given: 43
|
Re: CR: Lake Konfa [#permalink]
24 Aug 2011, 07:54
Agree with B.
_________________
If my post did a dance in your mind, send me the steps through kudos :)
My MBA journey at http://mbadilemma.wordpress.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Posts: 10
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR: Lake Konfa [#permalink]
17 Oct 2011, 17:40
Agree with b too! Since it already states that the security system works! Assuming that it will not work here is grasping too far! Why wouldn't it? B is a more plausible explanation for why pollution might accure!  Posted from GMAT ToolKit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 89
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
11
[0], given: 15
|
Re: CR: Lake Konfa [#permalink]
17 Oct 2011, 19:03
Clearly B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 261
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
20
[0], given: 20
|
Re: CR: Lake Konfa [#permalink]
19 Jan 2012, 06:39
patrickwestoo wrote: Agree with b too! Since it already states that the security system works! Assuming that it will not work here is grasping too far! Why wouldn't it? B is a more plausible explanation for why pollution might accure! Posted from GMAT ToolKitAre you talking about the first argument posted or the GMATPrep question? If it is the latter one, the correct answer is C.
_________________
-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 145
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 24
|
Re: Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very [#permalink]
23 Jan 2012, 06:50
Clearly B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 19 Jun 2011
Posts: 38
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 11
|
Re: Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very [#permalink]
23 Jan 2012, 14:50
B for me. I used the A.N.T technique and B fit the best. Spent 2:15 on this Q. I knew the answer was B at 1:10 but I reread question stem and answer choices
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 32
Schools: HBS, Yale, Darden, Haas
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very [#permalink]
24 Jan 2012, 12:56
+1B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 151
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very [#permalink]
27 Jan 2012, 17:25
agree with B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2011
Posts: 20
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very [#permalink]
25 Feb 2012, 22:33
I go for B
B is the best when compare with C, B is a more fundamental issue for the problem. When construction itself cause problem, whether leaking preventing technology is effective or not is no longer a main issue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 123
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 9
|
Re: Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very [#permalink]
26 Feb 2012, 03:23
IMO- B,
Premise- "an oil pipeline across the lake’s bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline" and "a technology for preventing leaks is being installed".
Conclusion-"provided this technology is effective, those fears are groundless."
Hence the Assumption in Option B-"Other than the possibility of a leak, there is no realistic pollution threat posed to the lake by the pipeline’s construction." is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very
[#permalink]
26 Feb 2012, 03:23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|
close
