Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

early questions are not worth more than the rest [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Aug 2012, 23:59

Hi, I browsed through Manhattan's GMAT Uncovered Book and it says that its a myth that early questions matter more than the rest. Has the algo for score calculation been updated or that was always a myth. 2nd point- Are all questions worth the same provided you finish the test in time?

Re: early questions are not worth more than the rest [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Aug 2012, 11:13

1

This post received KUDOS

shantanusingh wrote:

Hi, I browsed through Manhattan's GMAT Uncovered Book and it says that its a myth that early questions matter more than the rest. Has the algo for score calculation been updated or that was always a myth. 2nd point- Are all questions worth the same provided you finish the test in time?

Yes indeed, it is a myth. All the questions have equal importance. More careless mistakes in the beginning will not help you assess your true potential, so the point is never lose a question which you could have got right. It doesn't mean that you should be spending extra time for those first few problems, instead improve on reducing the careless mistakes and spend an average of 2 mins for a single problem. The less careless mistakes, the sooner you reach your maximum level questions. Don't try to assess how hard the question is, since it is an adaptive algorithm you might not know what level questions are being thrown to you. _________________

Re: early questions are not worth more than the rest [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2012, 12:19

msvel2304 wrote:

shantanusingh wrote:

Hi, I browsed through Manhattan's GMAT Uncovered Book and it says that its a myth that early questions matter more than the rest. Has the algo for score calculation been updated or that was always a myth. 2nd point- Are all questions worth the same provided you finish the test in time?

Yes indeed, it is a myth. All the questions have equal importance. More careless mistakes in the beginning will not help you assess your true potential, so the point is never lose a question which you could have got right. It doesn't mean that you should be spending extra time for those first few problems, instead improve on reducing the careless mistakes and spend an average of 2 mins for a single problem. The less careless mistakes, the sooner you reach your maximum level questions. Don't try to assess how hard the question is, since it is an adaptive algorithm you might not know what level questions are being thrown to you.

So it's actually about how soon you can reach (say) 700+ level questions and how many of them can you answer correctly, instead of the test trying to zero in on your level? _________________

Re: early questions are not worth more than the rest [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2012, 12:51

I took the Knewton courses, and in one of their earlier lectures they talk about this. The founder said that in the PAST, the algorithm used placed a lot of weight on the earlier questions, and a lot of people figured this out. Some students would increase their score +100 pts by taking advantage of this. The makers later on changed the algorithm so that test takers would be severely penalized if they did not finish the exam. So the suggested strategy was to spend an extra few seconds on the first 10 questions if need be.

Re: early questions are not worth more than the rest [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2012, 12:57

chris558 wrote:

I took the Knewton courses, and in one of their earlier lectures they talk about this. The founder said that in the PAST, the algorithm used placed a lot of weight on the earlier questions, and a lot of people figured this out. Some students would increase their score +100 pts by taking advantage of this. The makers later on changed the algorithm so that test takers would be severely penalized if they did not finish the exam. So the suggested strategy was to spend an extra few seconds on the first 10 questions if need be.

Last year's Princeton Review's "Cracking the GMAT" said the same thing, and it is undeniable that it seems to be common knowledge that your score swings more during the first 10/15 questions of every section.

Now, is that still true? is the new algorithm so different?

I'm actually confused right now. _________________

Re: early questions are not worth more than the rest [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Aug 2012, 23:16

highdiving wrote:

So it's actually about how soon you can reach (say) 700+ level questions and how many of them can you answer correctly, instead of the test trying to zero in on your level?

I don't quite understand what you are trying to say. But don't waste time gauging the question difficulty, its a complete waste of time. A 600 level scorer will take more time to reach that 700 solve because of difficulty and careless mistakes, while 700 level test taker will be able to move quickly to that level and also stay on that level for a long time. All the GMAT questions can be solved, but what you do in stipulated time determines your score. If you spend more time to increase your actual capability, then once you reach that level it takes half the time to reach the level where you started because you cannot keep on spending more time for every problem and for every additional minute or seconds you spent initially to improve your level, you have much less time for each of the latter problems. So the key is to get good at content knowledge, know your strengths and weakness, guess where you need to and where don't need to and reduce careless mistakes. _________________

Part 2 of the GMAT: How I tackled the GMAT and improved a disappointing score Apologies for the month gap. I went on vacation and had to finish up a...

Cal Newport is a computer science professor at GeorgeTown University, author, blogger and is obsessed with productivity. He writes on this topic in his popular Study Hacks blog. I was...

So the last couple of weeks have seen a flurry of discussion in our MBA class Whatsapp group around Brexit, the referendum and currency exchange. Most of us believed...