272. Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, according to three research studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
(A) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for
(B) be significant in reducing the risk of heart attacks and aid for
(C) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and aid
(D) cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks and aid to
(E) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks as well as aiding
There were previous posts on this question but there were inherent typos in those threads. I reposted this question for further clarification.
I am between A and C. C does seems shorter, but I am not sure if you eliminate the word for, will it change the meaning of the sentence? I will probably choose A.
I'm not satisfied with any, but will go with C .
ont you think 'reduces' should be used instead of 'reduce ' in C. Anyway, if were to pick one answer, i would still go with C
I'm not satisfied with any, but will go with C . ont you think 'reduces' should be used instead of 'reduce ' in C. Anyway, if were to pick one answer, i would still go with C
There is no ambuguity in C.
Underlining in the question is Wrong.
If you look at the Option A, it states "significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for".
So "may" should not be underlined in the question.
"may" will require plural verb so C is Right.
Please see below:
Eating saltwater fish may significantly reducethe risk of heart attacks and aidsufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, according to three research studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
So C has:
- proper S-V agreement
- Parallelism
- Correct Idiom "aid + person/thing"
It looks like choice is betwen A and C.
I will go with C, see below
bmwhype2 wrote:
272. Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, according to three research studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine. (A) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for---"also" is redundant, "for" makes sentence structure unparallel (B) be significant in reducing the risk of heart attacks and aid for (C) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and aid ---Perfect and Correct (D) cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks and aid to (E) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks as well as aiding
There were previous posts on this question but there were inherent typos in those threads. I reposted this question for further clarification.
272. Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, according to three research studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine. (A) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for (B) be significant in reducing the risk of heart attacks and aid for (C) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and aid (D) cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks and aid to (E) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks as well as aiding
There were previous posts on this question but there were inherent typos in those threads. I reposted this question for further clarification.
It has to be C You cannot "aid for sufferers", so A & B are out bc 'aid' is an active verb in this case.
You cannot "aid to sufferers" so bye-bye D.
And E has agreement issues btw "reduce" and "as well as aiding"
C it is by POE and by the fact that reduce and aid both act as active verbs in their respective clauses.
BTW, because may is part of the actual sentence, it should be "may significantly reduce" and not "may significantly reduces", to answer trahul4's question.
272. Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for sufferers of rheumatoid arthritis and asthma, according to three research studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine. (A) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and also aid for (B) be significant in reducing the risk of heart attacks and aid for (C) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks and aid (D) cause a significant reduction in the risk of heart attacks and aid to (E) significantly reduce the risk of heart attacks as well as aiding
There were previous posts on this question but there were inherent typos in those threads. I reposted this question for further clarification.
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of [#permalink]
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 9:15 am
SVP
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 Posts: 1694 Location: Peru Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government) WE 1: Economic research WE 2: Banking WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs Followers: 21
A. "Aid for" is not correct here - it seems to be acting as a noun that is parallel to risk. This makes no sense.
B. Same as A. If "aid" was used as a verb, it wouldn't be parallel to "reducing," so this answer choice is incorrect in either case.
C. This is the correct answer. The verb "aid" is parallel to reduce and the meaning of the sentence is clear.
D. Again, "aid to" seems to act as a noun that is parallel to risk, but this meaning doesn't make any sense. Also, "cause a significant reduction in the risk..." seems wordy - this could definitely be more concise.
E. We have a parallelism error here - reduce and aiding are not parallel.
mourinhogmat1
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of [#permalink]
The question tests "and" parallelism. In B, maybe significant in reducing is wrong usage. Same goes with D, may cause a significant reduction in... In E, as well as is the parallel marker but aiding is not parallel with reduce. So, that leaves us with A and C. A is wrong because of ALSO, which is redundant when and is present. I don't know about aid for. But considering idiomatic is not of much emphasis in the new version, I prefer to rule out based on ALSO rather than AID FOR..
kraizada84
Re: Eating saltwater fish may significantly reduce the risk of [#permalink]