Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 25 Sep 2016, 14:31
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Economic considerations color every aspect of international

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 610
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

Economic considerations color every aspect of international [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2005, 17:42
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

72% (02:47) correct 28% (02:18) wrong based on 419 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Economic considerations color every aspect of international dealings, and nations are just like individuals in that the lender sets the terms of its dealings with the borrower. That is why a nation that owes money to another nation cannot be world leader.
The reasoning in the passage assumes which one of the following?
(A) A nation that does not lend to any other nation cannot be a world leader.
(B) A nation that can set the terms of its dealings with other nations is certain
to be a world leader.
(C) A nation that has the terms of its dealings with another action set by that
nation cannot be a world leader.
(D) A nation that is a world leader can borrow from another nation as long as that
other nation does not set the terms of the dealings between the two nations.
(E) A nation that has no dealings with any other nation cannot be world leader.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 610
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2005, 18:53
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
OA is C. Praveen u r on the right track.
2 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 329 [2] , given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2005, 20:06
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
1) Economic considerations color every aspect of international dealing
2) Nations are just like individuals in that the lender sets the terms of its dealing with the borrower
3) That is why a nation that owes money to another nation cannot be a world leader <-- conclusion

nation owe money ---> cannot be world leader
can be world leader ---> does not owe money

Conclusion is true only if a nation is a world leader when it does not owe money to any other nation. We need an assumption along this line of reasoning.

The reasoning in the passage assumes which one of the following?

(A) A nation that does not lend to any other nation cannot be a world leader.
- Out

(B) A nation that can set the terms of its dealings with other nations is certain to be a world leader.
- No. We're told the nation can be one, but not definitely one (which the word 'certain' suggests)

(C) A nation that has the terms of its dealings with another action set by that nation cannot be a world leader.
- Yes. If we're told a nation that has the terms of its dealing set by another nation and this is sufficient to make it not be a 'world leader', then it's true that a nation that does not owe money (sets the terms) is a world leader.

(D) A nation that is a world leader can borrow from another nation as long as that other nation does not set the terms of the dealings between the two nations.
- No. Does not tells us why not oweing money makes a nation a world leader

(E) A nation that has no dealings with any other nation cannot be world leader.
- Out

I'll take C
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Mar 2005, 20:23
Late but (C) seemed to make the most sense though it kinda repeats what was stated in the passage
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 650
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 195 [0], given: 51

Re: CR:leaders [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2011, 12:24
i went with C , precisely because it repeats the words of the conclusion, but i could not find a reason to reject D , hence took 3:31 min to choose between C and D
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2011
Posts: 3
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: CR:leaders [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2011, 14:33
i also go with C
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 9776
Followers: 838

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Economic considerations color every aspect of international [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2015, 00:27
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2014
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 28

Re: Economic considerations color every aspect of international [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2015, 04:22
I just want to ask why it can not be D. I also narrowed it down to C and D, but I found that the premise says that lender sets dealings for their borrower. So I thought that the assumption should be D.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Mar 2014
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

CAT Tests
Re: Economic considerations color every aspect of international [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2016, 07:58
why is E wrong or out of context?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Mar 2014
Posts: 5
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

CAT Tests
Re: Economic considerations color every aspect of international [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Apr 2016, 08:00
What I wanted to say that, in order to be a leader you need to have some dealings, especially commanding attitude, but if there no dealings then that nation can never be a leader
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2015
Posts: 5
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: Q50 V
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 53

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Economic considerations color every aspect of international [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2016, 13:39
A,E straight away out.

I chose B initially which Says: (B) A nation that can set the terms of its dealings with other nations is certain
to be a world leader.

But, I found the wording of the statement is really strong.This is less like an assumption but seems more like a conclusion.

My answer:
(C) A nation that has the terms of its dealings with another action set by that
nation cannot be a world leader.

This perfectly fits as the answer and also matches the wording.
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 862
Followers: 259

Kudos [?]: 685 [1] , given: 25

Re: Economic considerations color every aspect of international [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2016, 17:40
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Actually, B and C are equally strong. B says "If X happens, then Y will certainly happen." C says "If X does NOT happen, Y will certainly NOT happen."

The easiest way to spot the difference is in looking at the end result. The argument concludes that certain countries will NOT be world leaders, so we need a choice that leads to that outcome. Knowing what will guarantee leadership does not tell us what will prevent leadership. However, we could just as well look at the first part of the conditional. We are talking about countries that CANNOT set their own terms, so the premise feeds into C, not B.

A more intuitive way to look at it is that B helps us to conclude that lending countries ARE world leaders (something the argument isn't claiming), while C addresses the actual claim made in the argument: that borrowing countries cannot be world leaders.
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Re: Economic considerations color every aspect of international   [#permalink] 30 Jul 2016, 17:40
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 Aristotle CR. Economic considerations colour every aspect of jamifahad 18 25 Jul 2011, 04:11
7 Demographers doing research for an international economics sushma0805 9 25 Aug 2010, 19:56
21 Demographers doing research for an international economics snipertrader 14 04 Aug 2009, 18:50
Demographers doing research for an international economics vscid 2 08 Dec 2007, 08:58
Demographers doing research for an international economics ayushi 8 24 Oct 2006, 17:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Economic considerations color every aspect of international

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.